Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:10:00.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Romance of the Novel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2012

E. L. Bowie  and
S. J. Harrison
E. L. Bowie
Affiliation:
Corpus Christi College, Oxford
S. J. Harrison
Affiliation:
Corpus Christi College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Students of the ancient world are falling for the ancient Greek and Latin novels in increasing numbers, a state of affairs of which there were few intimations a generation ago. To be sure, the Satyrica of Petronius and the Metamorphoses of Apuleius were given standing-room on the edge of the classical canon, though few scholars and fewer students made the acquaintance of the complete texts. Encounters were usually restricted to the Cena Trimalchionis and Cupid and Psyche, and linguistic oddities were the chief topics of polite conversation (nothing evil in this, so long as other topics are not barred). There were of course exceptions, like Eduard Fraenkel's Oxford seminar on Petronius in 1958/9, where study of language was but one of many techniques harnessed to the establishment and interpretation of the whole text. The Greek novels were still wallflowers: partly, no doubt, because they constituted only a small portion of a vast Greek prose literature written in a period generally judged decadent, whereas the Latin novels were welcome and substantial contributors to the comparatively exiguous remains of Latin prose written by Romans at their imperial acme. No explosion of interest had followed Rohde's Der griechische Roman und seine Vorläufer of 1876, and although some important work was done on establishment and interpretation of texts and on the development of the genre, scholars active in this field were isolated from each other and their results made little impact on their colleagues. Furthermore much of that work was focused, like Rohde's, on trying to elucidate the genre's origins.

Type
Survey Articles
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 83 , November 1993 , pp. 159 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © E. L. Bowie and S. J. Harrison 1993. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adamiewitz, J. (1987), ‘Zum literanschen Charakter von Petrons Satyrica’, RhM 130, 329–46.Google Scholar
Alpers, K. (1990), ’Innere Beziehungen und Kontraste als “hermeneutische Zeichen” in den Metamorphosen des Apuleius von Madauros’, WJA 6, 197–207.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. (1976), Studies in Lucian's Comic Fiction. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, G. (1982), Eros Sophistes: Ancient Novelists at Play (American Classical Studies IX). Chico, Ca.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. (1984), Ancient Fiction: the Novel in the Graeco-Roman World. London and Totowa, NJ.Google Scholar
Aragosti, A., Cosci, P. and Cotrozzi, A. (1988), Petronio: l'episodio di Quartilla. Bologna.Google Scholar
Arrowsmith, W. (1966), ‘Luxury and death in the Satyricon’, Arion 5, 304–31.Google Scholar
Astbury, R. (1977), ‘Petronius, P.Oxy. 3010, and Menippean satire’, CPh 72, 23–31.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1981), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (trans. Emerson, C. and Holquist, M.). Austin.Google Scholar
Barber, G. (1989), Daphnis and Chloe. The Markets and Metamorphoses of an Unknown Bestseller. The Panizzi Lectures 1988. London.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1986), ‘Tracce di narrativa greca e romanzo latino: una rassegna’, in Semiotica della novella latina, 219–36.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1991), ‘Il romanzo’, in Montanari, F. (ed.), La Prosa Latina, 229–48. Rome.Google Scholar
Barns, J. W. B. (1956), ‘Egypt and the Greek romance’, Akten des viii Kongress für Papyrologie, 20–36. Vienna.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (1989), Decoding the Ancient Novel. The Reader and the Role of Description in Heliodorus and Achilles Tatius. Princeton.Google Scholar
Baslez, M.-F. and Trédé, M. (1992), Le monde du roman grec. Études de littérature ancienne (Papers of a colloqium held in Paris in 1987). Paris.Google Scholar
Beaton, R. (ed.) (1988), The Greek Novel A.D. 1–1985. London and Sydney.Google Scholar
Beaton, R. (1989), The Medieval Greek Romance. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Beck, R. (1973), ‘Some observations on the narrative technique of Petronius’, Phoenix 27, 42–61.Google Scholar
Beck, R. (1975), ‘Encolpius at the Cena’, Phoenix 29, 271–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, R. (1979), ‘Eumolpus poeta, Eumolpus fabulator’, Phoenix 33, 239–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernardo, A. and Levin, S. (eds) (1990), The Classics in the Middle Ages. Binghamton.Google Scholar
Bernhard, M. (1927), Der Stil des Apuleius von Madaura. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Berti, M. (1967), ‘Sulla interpretazione mistica del romanzo di Longo’, SCO 16, 343–58.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (1982), ‘A proposito dei versi sotadei greci e latini’, MD 9, 59–105, esp. 90–2.Google Scholar
Billault, A. (1989), ‘De l'histoire au roman: Hermocrate de Syracuse’, REG 102, 540–8.Google Scholar
Billault, A. (1991), La création romanesque dans la littérature grecque à l'époque imperiale. Paris.Google Scholar
Binder, G. and Merkelbach, R. (eds) (1968), Amor und Psyche (Wege der Forschung CXXVI). Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Boldrini, S. (1989), ‘Il pasto della vedova: cibo, vino, sesso, da Petronio a J. Amado’, in Hofmann (1989), 121–32.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (1977), ‘The novels and the real world’, in Reardon (1977), 91–6.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (1985), ‘The Greek novel’, in The Cambridge History of Classical Literature 1, 683–99 and 877–86 (= paperback vol. 1.4 (1989). 123–39 and 243–52). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (1990), ‘Who read the ancient Greek novels?’ in Tatumand Vernazza (1990), 150–1.Google Scholar
Boyce, B. C. (1991), The Language of the Freedmen in Petronius’ Cena Trimalchionis (Mnemosyne suppl. CXVII). Leiden.Google Scholar
Callebat, L. (1968), Sermo Cotidianus dans les Métamorphoses d'Apulée. Caen.Google Scholar
Callebat, L. (1978), ‘La prose des Metamorphoses : génèse et spécificité’, in Hijmans and van der Paardt (1978), 167–87.Google Scholar
Callebat, L. (1992), Le Satyricon de Pétrone et L'Âne d'Or d'Apulée sont-ils des romans?', Euphrosyne 20, 149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, , Averil, (1969), ‘Petronius and Plato’, CQ n.s. 19, 367–70.Google Scholar
Carney, T. F. (1961), Achilles Tatius Book 3. A Commentary. Salisbury [Harare].Google Scholar
Chalk, H. H. O. (1960), ‘Eros and the Lesbian pastorals of Longus’, JHS 80, 32–51.Google Scholar
Ciaffi, V. (1963), Fulgenzio e Petronio. Turin.Google Scholar
Colonna, A. (1950), ‘L'assedio di Nisibis del 350 d.C. e la cronologia di Eliodoro Emiseno’, Athenaeum 28, 79–87.Google Scholar
Conca, F., De Carli, E. and Zanetto, G. (1983), Lessico dei romanzieri greci I (A–Γ). Milan.Google Scholar
Conca, F., De Carli, E. and Zanetto, G. (1989), Lessico dei romanzieri greci II (Δ–I). Hildesheim-Zurich-N.Y.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1991), The Poems of Petronius (American classical studies XXV). Atlanta.Google Scholar
D'Arms, J. H. (1981), Commerce and Social Standing in Ancient Rome. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Filippo, J. G. (1990), ‘Curiositas and the Platonism of Apuleius’ Golden Ass’, AJP III, 471–92.Google Scholar
de Jong, J. L. (1989), ‘Renaissance representations of Cupid and Psyche: Apuleius versus Fulgentius’, in Hofmann (1989), 75–86.Google Scholar
Dihle, A. (1978), ‘Zur Datierung des Metiochos-Romans’, Würzb.Jahrb. f. die Altertumsw. NF 4. 47–55.Google Scholar
Dihle, A. (1989), Die griechische und lateinische Literatur derKaiserzeit. Munich.Google Scholar
Donini, P. (1979), ‘Apuleioeil platonismo medio’, in Pennacini et al. (1979), 103–12.Google Scholar
Dowden, K. (1982), ‘Apuleius and the art of narration’, CQ n.s. 32, 419–35.Google Scholar
Effe, B. (1976), ‘Der misglückte Selbstmord des Aristomenes (Apuleius Met. 1.14–17): Zur Romanparodie im griechischen Eselsroman’, Hermes 104, 362–75.Google Scholar
Egger, B. (1988), ‘Zu den Frauenrollen im griechischen Roman: die Frau als Heldin und Leserin’, in Hofmann (1988), 33–66.Google Scholar
Egger, B. (1990), Women in the Greek Novel: Constructing the Feminine (Ph.D. Diss. UC Irvine). Irvine.Google Scholar
Elsom, H. (1989), ‘Apuleius and the movies’, in Hofmann (1989), 141–50.Google Scholar
Elsom, H. (1992), ‘Callirhoe: displaying in the phallic woman’, in Richlin (1992), 212–30.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. and Dimundo, R. (1988), I racconti del ‘Satyricon’. Rome.Google Scholar
Fehling, D. (1977), Amor und Psyche; Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Feuillâtre, E. (1966), Etudes sur les Ethiopiques d'Héliodore. Poitiers.Google Scholar
Fick, N. (1985), ‘La magie dans les Métamorphoses d'Apulée’, REL 63, 132–47.Google Scholar
Fick, N. (1987), ‘L'Isis des Métamorphoses d'Apulee’, RBPh 65, 31–51.Google Scholar
Fick, N. (1992), ‘La métamorphose initiatique’, in Moreau (1992), 1.271–92.Google Scholar
Fick-Michel, N. (1991), Art et mystique dans les Métamorphoses d'Apulée. Paris.Google Scholar
Finkelpearl, E. (1990), ‘Psyche, Aeneas and an Ass: Apuleius Met. 6.10–6.21’, TAPA 120, 333–48.Google Scholar
Forbes, C. A. (1943/1934), ‘Charite and Dido’, CJ 37, 39–40.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1985), The History of Sexuality. II. The Use of Pleasure. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1986), The History of Sexuality. III. The Care of the Self. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S. A. (1991a), ‘Charite dulcissima : A note on the nameless Charite at Ap.Met. 7.12’, Mnem. 44, 387–94.Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S. A. (1991b), ‘Vergil's tale of the Trojan Horse in Apuleius’ robber-tale of Thrasyleon’, PP 46, 95–111.Google Scholar
Frangoulidis, S. A. (1992), ‘Epic inversion in Apuleius' tale of Tlepolemus/Haemus’, Mnemosyne 45, 60–74.Google Scholar
Fusillo, M. (1988), ‘Textual patterns and narrative situations in the Greek novel’, in Hofmann (1988), 17–32.Google Scholar
Fusillo, M. (1989), Il romanzogreco: Polifonia ed Eros. Marsilio editori, Venice (translated as Lenaissancedu roman grec. Paris (1991)).Google Scholar
Fusillo, M. (1990) (ed.), Antonio Diogene. Le incredibih avventure al di là diTule. Palermo.Google Scholar
Galand, P. (1989), ‘Le conte de la Matrone d'Ephèse: Rhétorique de ‘guidage’ et reception. Pétrone lu par La Fontaine et Saint-Evremond’, in Hofmann (1989), 109–20.Google Scholar
Garnaud, J.-P. (1991) (ed.), Achilles Tatius d'Alexandrie. Le roman de Leucippé et Clitophon. Paris.Google Scholar
Gärtner, H. (1967), ‘Xenophon von Ephesos’, RE IXA.2, 2055–89.Google Scholar
Gärtner, H. (1980), ‘Der antike Roman. Bestand und Möglichkeiten’, in Neukam, P. (ed.), Vorschläge und Anregungen, 24–56. Munich.Google Scholar
Gärtner, H. (1984) (ed.), Beiträge zum griechischen Liebesroman. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
George, P. A. (1979), Review of Petersmann, CR n.s. 29, 233–4.Google Scholar
Geyer, A. (1977), ‘Roman und Mysterienritual’, WJA 3, 179–96.Google Scholar
Gianotti, G. F. (1986), ‘Romanzo’ e ideologia: studi sulle Metamorfosi di Apuleio. Naples.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1973), ‘The sexual episodes in the Satyricon’, CPh 68, 172–85.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1980), ‘Erotic narrative: virginity and going the whole hog’, in Tatum and Vernazza (1993), 114.Google Scholar
Graves, R. (1990), Apuleius: The Golden Ass (translated by Robert Graves, translation revised with new introduction by Michael Grant). Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1977), La Guerre Civile de Pétrone. Paris.Google Scholar
Grondona, M. (1980), La religionee la superstizione nella Cena Trimalchionis. Brussels.Google Scholar
Gual, C. (1988), Les origines de la novela (2nd edn). Madrid.Google Scholar
Guido, G. (1975), Petmnio: Bellum Civile. Florence.Google Scholar
Gwyn Griffiths, J. (1975), Apuleius Metamorphoses XI. Leiden.Google Scholar
Gwyn Griffiths, J. (1978), ‘Isis in the Metamorphoses of Apuleius’, in Hijmans and van der Paardt (1978), 141–66.Google Scholar
Habrich, E. (1960) (ed.), Iamblichi Babyloniacorum reliquiae. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. (1971), Narrative Technique in Ancient Greek Romances: Studies of Chariton, Xenophon Ephesius and Achilles Tatius. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. (1980), Den antiken Romanen. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. (1983), The Novel in Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. (1984), ‘The Parthenope romance decapitated?’, Symb.Osl. 59, 61–92.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. (1985), ‘Metiochus at Polycrates' court’, Eranos 83, 92–102.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. (1987), ‘Callirhoe and Parthenope: the beginnings of the historical novel’, Class Ant. 6, 184–204.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. (1989), ‘Hermes and the invention of the lyre: an unorthodox version’, Symb.Osl. 64, 1–55.Google Scholar
Haight, E. H. (1927), Apuleius and his Influence. New York.Google Scholar
Hanson, J. A. (1989) (ed.), Apuleius: Metamorphoses (2 vols). Cambridge, Ma.Google Scholar
Harrauer, C. and Römer, F. (1985), ‘Beobachtungen zum Metamorphosenprolog des Apuleius’, Mnem. 37, 353–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (1988), ‘Three notes on Apuleius’, CQ n.s. 38, 265–7.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (1990a), ‘The speaking book: The Prologue to Apuleius' Metamorphoses’, CQ n.s. 40, 507–13.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (1990b), ‘Some Odyssean scenes in Apuleius' Metamorphoses’, MD 25, 193–201.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (1991), Review of Hanson (1989), CR n.s. 41, 83–4.Google Scholar
Haslam, M. W. (1981), ‘Narrative about Tinouphis in prosimetrum’, P. Turner no. 8, 35–45. London.Google Scholar
Hefti, V. (1950), Zur Erzählungstechnik in Heliodors Aethiopika. Wien.Google Scholar
Heiserman, A. (1977), The Novel Before the Novel. Chicago.Google Scholar
Heller, S. (1983), ‘Apuleius, Platonic dualism, and eleven’, AJP 104, 321–39.Google Scholar
Henrichs, A. (1972) (ed.), Lollianus Phoenicica. Bonn.Google Scholar
Hernandez Lara, C. (1990), ‘Rhetorical aspects of Chariton of Aphrodisias’, in Tatum and Vernazza (1990), 135–6.Google Scholar
Hernandez Lara, C. (1991), ‘Style and literary context in Chariton of Aphrodisias’, paper read to 11th Groningen Colloquium.Google Scholar
Hijmans, B. L. Jr. (1987), ‘Apuleius Philosophus Platonicus’, ANRW 11.36.1, 395–475.Google Scholar
Hijmans, B. L. Jr. and van der Paardt, R. T. (1978), Aspects of Apuleius' Golden Ass. Groningen.Google Scholar
Hijmans, B. L. Jr., van der Paardt, R. T., Smits, E. R., Westendorp Boerma, R. E. H., and Westerbrink, A. G. (1977), Apuleius Madaurensis Metamorphoses Books IV 1–27. Groningen.Google Scholar
Hijmans, B. L. Jr., van der Paardt, R. T., Smits, E. R., Westendorp Boerma, R. E. H., and Westerbrink, A. G. (1981), Apuleius Madaurensis Metamorphoses Books VI 25–32 and VII. Groningen.Google Scholar
Hijmans, B. L. jr., van der Paardt, R. T., Smits, E. R., Westendorp Boerma, R. E. H., and Westerbrink, A. G. (1985), Apuleius Madaurensis Metamorphoses Book VIII 1–27. Groningen.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H. (1988) (ed.), Groningen Colloquia on the Novel: Volume I. Groningen.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H. (1989) (ed.), Groningen Colloquia on the Novel: Volume II. Groningen.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H. (1990) (ed.), Groningen Colloquia on the Novel: Volume III. Groningen.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H. (1991) (ed.), Groningen Colloquia on the Novel: Volume IV. Groningen.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (1984), ‘Apuleius und der Verfasser des griechischen Eselromans’, WJA 10, 161–78.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (1986), Der antike Roman. Munich and Zurich.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1989), ‘Petronius' Cena and the uses of literacy’, G&R 36, 74–89 and 194–209.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (1986), ‘The narrative architecture of Petronius' Satyricon’, AC 55, 190–212.Google Scholar
Huber, G. (1990a), Das Motiv der ‘Witwe von Ephesus’ in lateinischen Texten der Antike und des Mittelalters. Mannheim.Google Scholar
Huber, G. (1990b), ‘Walter Charleton's ‘Ephesian Matron’: Ein Zeugnis der Petron-Rezeption im England der Restauration’, in Hofmann (1990), 139–57.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (1983), A Study of Daphnis and Chloe. Cambridge.Google Scholar
James, P. (1987), Unity in Diversity: A Study of Apuleius' Metamorphoses. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Jones, C. P. (1980), ‘Apuleius' Metamorphoses and Lollianus' Phoenikik’, Phoenix 34, 243–54.Google Scholar
Jones, F. (1987), ‘The narrator and the narrative of the Satyricon’, Latomus 46, 810–19.Google Scholar
Katz, P. B. (1976), ‘The myth of Psyche: a definition of the nature of the feminine’, Arethusa 9, 111–18.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1978), ‘Encolpius and Agamemnon in Petronius’, AJP 99, 171–8.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1990a), Apuleius: Cupid and Psyche. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1990b), ‘Psyche and her mysterious husband’, in Russell (1990), 175–98.Google Scholar
Kerényi, K. (1927), Die griechisch-orientalische Romanliteratur in religionsgeschichtlicher Beleuchtung. Tübingen (repr. Darmstadt 1962).Google Scholar
Koziol, (1872), Der Stil des Apuleius. Vienna.Google Scholar
Krabbe, J. K. (1989), The Metamorphoses of Apuleius. New York etc.Google Scholar
Kuch, H.et al. (1989), Der antike Roman. Untersuchungen zur literarischen Kommunikation und Gattungsgeschichte. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kudlien, F. (1989), ‘Kindesaussetzung im antiken Roman: ein Thema zwischen Fiktionalität und Lebenswirklichkeit’, in Hofmann (1989), 25–44.Google Scholar
Kussl, R. (1990), ‘Die Metamorphosen des “Lucius von Patrai”: Untersuchungen zu Photius Bibl. 129’, RhM 133, 379–88.Google Scholar
Kussl, R. (1991), Papyrusfragmente der griechischen Romane. Ausgewählte Untersuchungen (Classica Monacensia II). Tübingen.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (1990), ‘Person, persona and representation in Apuleius' Metamorphoses’, MD 25, 129–64.Google Scholar
Lancel, S. (1987), ‘Y-a-t'il une Africitas?’, REL 62, 161–82.Google Scholar
La Penna, A. (1985), ‘Una novella di Apuleio e l'lliupersis virgiliana’, Maia 37, 145–60.Google Scholar
Lazzarini, C. (1985), ‘Il modello virgiliano nel lessico delle Metamorfosi di Apuleio’, SCO 35, 131–60.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, C. S. (1988), ‘Fact and fiction — the third siege of Nisibis (A.D. 350)’, Historia 38, 107–25.Google Scholar
Liviabella Furiani, P. and Scarcella, A. M. (1989) (eds), Piccolo mondo antico: le donne, gli amori, i costumi, il mondo reale nel romanzo greco antico. Perugia.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, M. (1992), ‘Eroi screditati dal testo: strutture della parodia nelle storie di briganti in Apuleio Met. IV.9–21’, Maia 44, 65–78.Google Scholar
Lucke, C. M. and Schäfer, K.-H. (1985), Chariton: Kallirhoe (German trans.). Leipzig.Google Scholar
MacQueen, B. D. (1990), Myth, Rhetoric and Fiction: a Reading of Longus's Daphnis and Chloe. Lincoln, Neb. & London.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (1976), ‘Der Metiochus-Parthenope-Roman’, ZPE 23, 1–20.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (1981), ‘Lucius the donkey and Roman law’, M.Phil.Lond. 4, 161–77.Google Scholar
Maróth, M. (1979), ‘Le siège de Nisibe en 350 ap. J.-C. d'après des sources syriennes’, Act.Ant.Hung. 17, 239–43.Google Scholar
Marshall, P. K. (1983), ‘Apuleius’, in Reynolds (1983), 15–16.Google Scholar
Mason, H. J. (1978), ‘Fabula Graecanica: Apuleius and his Greek sources’, in Hijmansand Van der Paardt (1978), 1–15.Google Scholar
Mason, H. J. (1983), ‘The distinction of Lucius in Apuleius' Metamorphoses’, Phoenix 37, 135–43.Google Scholar
Mass, E. (1989), ‘Tradition und Innovation im Romanschaffen Boccaccios’, in Hofmann (1989), 87–108.Google Scholar
Mazal, O. (1962–1963), ‘Der griechische und byzantinische Roman in der Forschung von 1945 bis 1960’, Jahrb. d. Öst. Byz. Gesell. 11–12, 7–55.Google Scholar
Mazal, O. (1964), ‘Der griechische und byzantinische Roman in der Forschung von 1945 bis 1960’, Jahrb. d. Öst. Byz. Gesell. 13, 29–86, and 14, 83–124.Google Scholar
Médan, P. (1926), La latinité d'Apulée dans les Métamorphoses. Paris.Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. (1959), ‘Daphnis and Chloe. Roman und Mysterium’, Antaios 1, 47–60.Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. (1962), Roman und Mysterium in der Antike. Munich and Berlin.Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. (1988), Die Hirten des Dionysos. Mysterien der römischen Kaiserzeit. Munich and Berlin.Google Scholar
Millar, F. G. B. (1981), ‘The world of the Golden Ass’, JRS 71, 63–75.Google Scholar
Miralles, C. (1967) (ed.), Xenophon. Barcelona.Google Scholar
Miralles, C. (1968), La novela en la antiguedad clásica. Barcelona.Google Scholar
Molinié, G. (1979) (ed.), Chariton (Budé, revised by A. Billault 1990). Paris.Google Scholar
Montague, H. (1992), ‘Sweet and pleasant passion: Female and male fantasy in ancient romance novels’, in Richlin (1992), 231–49.Google Scholar
Moreau, A. (1992) (ed.), L'initiation: les rites d'adolescence et les mysterès (2 vols). Montpellier.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. (1978), Apuleio e il Platonismo. Florence.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. (1990), ‘Le Metamorfosi di Apuleio, la fabula milesia e il romanzo’, MD 25, 115–28.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. (1982), ‘History, romance and realism in Heliodorus’, Class. Ant. 1, 221–65.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. (1989a), ‘The story of Knemon in Heliodorus' Aithiopika’, JHS 109, 99–113.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. (1989b), ‘A sense of the ending: the conclusion of Heliodorus' ΑΙΘΙΟΠΙΚΑ’, TAPhA 119, 299–320.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (1989), ‘The stranger's stratagem: self-disclosure and self-sufficiency in Greek culture’, JHS 109, 114–33.Google Scholar
Müller, C. W. (1980), ‘Die Witwe von Ephesus’, A&A 26, 103–21.Google Scholar
Müller, C. W. (1981), ‘Der griechische Roman’, in See von, K. (ed.), Neues Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft, 377–412. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Müller, K. (1978), Petron: Satyrica. Munich.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. (1962), review of first edn of Müller K. (1978), JRS 52, 227–32.Google Scholar
Oldfather, W. A., Canter, H. V. and Perry, B. E. (1934), Index Apuleianus. Middletown, Ct.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, J. N. (1980), A Lexicon to Achilles Tatius. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Pacchieni, M. (1978), La novella milesia in Petronio. Lecce.Google Scholar
Papanikolaou, A. D. (1973a) (ed.), Xenophon Ephesius. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Papanikolaou, A. D. (1973b), Chariton-Studien. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. (1971), ‘A Greek Satyricon?’, BICS 8, 53–68.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. (1974), ‘Narrative about Iolaus’, P. Oxy. 42 no. 3010, 34–41.Google Scholar
Pecere, O. (1975), Petronio: la novella della matrona di Efeso. Padua.Google Scholar
Pennacini, A. (1979), ‘Tecniche del racconto nelle Metamorphosi. Analisi del libri 1, 2, 3’, in Pennacini et al. (1979), 21–102.Google Scholar
Pennacini, A., Donini, P. L., Alimenti, T. and Monteduro Roccavini, A. (1979), Apuleio letterato,filosofo, mago. Rome.Google Scholar
Penwill, J. L. (1990), ‘Ambages Reciprocae: Reviewing Apuleius' Metamorphoses’, in Boyle, A. J., The Imperial Muse, II: Flavian Epicists to Claudian, 211–35. Berwick, Vic.Google Scholar
Perry, B. E. (1930), ‘Chariton and his romance from a literary-historical point of view’, AJP 51, 93–134.Google Scholar
Perry, B. E. (1967), The Ancient Romances. A Literary-historical Account of Their Origins. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Perutelli, A. (1985), ‘Le chiacchiere dei liberti: dialogo e commedia in Petronio 41–46’, Maia 37, 103–19.Google Scholar
Perutelli, A. (1990), ‘Il narratore nel Satyricon’, MD 25, 9–26.Google Scholar
Petersmann, H. (1977), Petrous Urbane Prosa. Vienna.Google Scholar
Petersmann, H. (1985), ‘Umwelt, Sprachsituation und Stilschichten in Petrons Satyrica’, ANRW 11.32.3, 1687–1705.Google Scholar
Philonenko, M. (1968) (ed.), Joseph and Asenath. Leiden.Google Scholar
Plepelits, K. (1976), Chariton von Aphrodisias: Kallirhoe (German trans.). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Plepelits, K. (1980), Achilleus Tatios: Leukippe und Kleitophon (German trans.). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Prete, S. (1988), ‘La questione delta lingua latina nel Quattrocento e l'importanza dell' opera di Apuleio’, in Hofmann (1988), 123–40.Google Scholar
Pulquério Futre Pinheiro, M. (1987), Estruturas técnico-narrativas nas Etiópicas de Heliodoro. Lisbon.Google Scholar
Rankin, H. D. (1971), Petronius the Artist. The Hague.Google Scholar
Rattenbury, R. M., Lumb, T. W. and Maillon, J. (1935–1943, 2nd edn 1960) (eds), Héliodore. Les Éthiopiques. Budé.Google Scholar
Rea, J. (1967), ‘History (?)’, P.Oxy. 27 no. 2466, 134–6.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. (1969), ‘The Greek novel’, Phoenix 23, 55–73.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. (1971), Courants littéraires grecs des IIe et IIIe siècles après J.-C., 309–403. Paris.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. (1977) (ed.), Erotica antiqua. Acta of the International Conference on the Ancient Novel. Bangor.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. (1982a), ‘Theme, structure and narrative in Chariton’, YCS 27, 1–27.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. (1982b), reviews Molinié (1979) in REG, 157–73.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. (1989) (ed.), Collected Ancient Greek Novels. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. (1990a), reviews Merkelbach (1988) in CR 40, 81–2.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. (1990b), ‘Mythos ou logos: Longus' Lesbian pastorals’, in Tatum and Vernazza (1990), 21.Google Scholar
Reardon, B. P. (1991), The Form of Greek Romance. Princeton.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. D. (1969), ‘Author variants in Longus?’, PCPhS N.S. 15, 75–85.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. D. (1971), ‘Hiatus in the Greek novelists’, CQ N.S. 21, 514–39.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. D. (1979), ‘Fulvio Orsini and Longus’, JHS 99, 165–7.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. D. (1982, 2nd edn 1985) (ed.), Longus. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Reeve, M. D. (1983), ‘Petronius’, in Reynolds (1983), 295–300.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. (1983) (ed.), Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1992) (ed.), Pornography and Representation in Greece and Rome. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. R. and Valette, P. (1940–1945), Apulée: Les Métamorphoses, 3 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Rohde, E. (1876, 3rd edn 1913, repr. 1960), Der griechische Roman und seine Vorläufer. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. (1983), ‘Trimalchione in scena’, Maia 35, 213–27.Google Scholar
Rose, K. F. C. (1971), The Date and Author of the Satyricon (Mnemosyne suppl. XVI). Leiden.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Montero, C. (1980), ‘Una observación para la cronologia di Caritón de Afrodisias’, Estudios clásicos 24, 63–9.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Montero, C. (1989a), ‘P.Oxy. 2466: the Sesonchosis Romance’, ZPE 79, 51–7.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Montero, C. (1989b), ‘Caritón de Afrodisias y el mundo real’, in Liviabella Furiani and Scarcella (1989), 107–49.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Montero, C. (1991), ‘Aspects of the vocabulary of Chariton of Aphrodisias’, CQ 41, 484–9.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1990) (ed.), Antonine Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Saïd, S. (1987), ‘La société dans le roman grec ou la campagne vue de la ville’, in Frézouls, E. (ed.), Sociétés urbaines, sociétés rurales dans l'Asie Mineure et la Syrie hellénistiques et romaines, Actes du colloque organisé a Strasbourg 1985, 149–71. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Sandy, G. N. (1974a), ‘Recent scholarship on the prose fiction of classical Antiquity’, Classical World 67, 321–59 (reprinted in The Classical World Bibliography of Roman Drama and Poetry and Ancient Fiction. N.Y. and London (1978)).Google Scholar
Sandy, G. N. (1974b), ‘Scaenica Petroniana’, TAPA 104, 329–46.Google Scholar
Sandy, G. N. (1978), ‘Book XI: Ballast or Anchor?’, in Hijmans and van der Paardt, 123–40.Google Scholar
Sandy, G. N. (1979), ‘Notes on Lollianus' Phoinicica’, AJP 100, 367–76.Google Scholar
Sandy, G. N. (1982a), Heliodorus. Boston.Google Scholar
Sandy, G. N. (1982b), ‘Characterisation and philosophical decor in Heliodorus' Aethiopica’, TAPA 112, 141–67.Google Scholar
Scarcella, A. M. (1968a), Struttura e tecnica narrativa in Longo sofista. Palermo.Google Scholar
Scarcella, A. M. (1968b), La Lesbo di Longo sofista. Rome.Google Scholar
Scarcella, A. M. (1970), ‘Realtà e letteratura nel paesaggio sociale ed economico del romanzo di Longo sofista’, Maia 22, 103–31.Google Scholar
Scarcella, A. M. (1972), ‘Testimonianze della crisi di un' età nel romanzo di Eliodoro’, Maia 24, 8–41.Google Scholar
Scarcella, A. M. (1977), ‘Les structures socio-économiques du roman de Xénophon d'Éphèse’, REG 90, 249–62.Google Scholar
Scarcella, A. M. (1981), ‘Metastasi narratologica del dato storico nel romanzo greco’, in Atti del convegno internazionale ‘Letteratura classica e narratologia’. Perugia.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (1988), ‘La tragedia di Psiche: Note ad Apuleio Met. 4.28–35’, Maia 40, 141–50.Google Scholar
Schlam, C. C. (1970), ‘Platonicain the Metamorphoses of Apuleius’, TAPA 101, 477–87.Google Scholar
Schlam, C. C. (1971), ‘The scholarship on Apuleius since 1938’, CW 64, 285–309.Google Scholar
Schlam, C. C. (1976), Apuleius and the Monuments. University Park, Pa.Google Scholar
Schlam, C. C. (1990), ‘Apuleius and the Middle Ages’, in Bernardo and Levin (1990), 363–9.Google Scholar
Schlam, C. C. (1992), The Metamorphoses of Apuleius: On Making An Ass of Oneself. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Schmeling, G. L. (1974), Chariton. New York.Google Scholar
Schmeling, G. L. (1976) (ed.), The Petronian Society Newsletter. Gainesville.Google Scholar
Schmeling, G. L. (1980), Xenophon of Ephesus. Boston.Google Scholar
Schmeling, G. L. (1992), ‘The Satyricon: the sense of an ending’, RhM 134, 352–77.Google Scholar
Schmeling, G. and Stuckey, J. (1977), A Bibliography of Petronius (Mnemosyne suppl. XXXIX). Leiden.Google Scholar
Schönberger, O. (1960, 4th edn 1989) (ed.), Longos. Hirtengeschichten von Daphnis und Chloe. Berlin.Google Scholar
Scobie, A. (1975), Apuleius Metamorphoses 1. Meisenheim.Google Scholar
Scobie, A. (1978a), ‘The influence of Apuleius' Metamorphoses in Renaissance Italy and Spain’, in Hijmans and van der Paardt (1978), 211–30.Google Scholar
Scobie, A. (1978b), ‘The structure of Apuleius' Metamorphoses’, in Hijmans and van der Paardt (1978), 43–61.Google Scholar
Scobie, A. (1983), Apuleius and Folklore. London.Google Scholar
Scotti, M. T. (1982), ‘Il proemio delle Metamorfosi tra Ovidio ed Apuleio’, GIF 34, 43–65.Google Scholar
Semiotica della novella latina (1986) [Materiali e contributi per la storia della narrativa greco-latina IV]. Rome.Google Scholar
Slater, N. W. (1989), Reading Petronius. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Smith, M. S. (1975), Petronius: Cena Trimalchionis. Oxford.Google Scholar
Smith, M. S. (1985), ‘Petronius: a bibliography 1945–82’, ANRW 11.32.3, 1628–65.Google Scholar
Smith, W. S. (1972), ‘The narrative voice in Apuleius' Metamorphoses’, TAPA 103, 513–34.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. (1990), ‘“Popularity” of the ancient novel’, in Tatum and Vernazza (1990), 148–9.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. A. and Winkler, J. J. (1993), Ancient Greek Novels: The Fragments. Princeton.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P. (1965), Petronius: The Satyricon and the Fragments. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P. (1968), The Satyricon of Petronius. London.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P. (1976), ‘Interpolations in Petronius’, PCPS n.s. 22, 90–122.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P. (1985), Literature and Politics in the Age of Nero. Ithaca N.Y.Google Scholar
Summers, R. G. (1970), ‘Roman justice and Apuleius' Metamorphoses’, TAPA 101, 511–31.Google Scholar
Summers, R. G. (1972), ‘Apuleius' Juridicus’, Historia 21, 120–6.Google Scholar
Summers, R. G. (1973), ‘A note on the date of the Golden Ass’, AJP 94, 375–83.Google Scholar
Szepessy, T. (1976), ‘Le siège de Nisibe et la chronologie d' Héliodore’, Act.Ant.Hung. 24, 247–76.Google Scholar
Tatum, J. (1969), ‘The tales of Apuleius' Golden Ass’, TAPA 100, 487–527.Google Scholar
Tatum, J. (1979), Apuleius and the Golden Ass. Ithaca N.Y.Google Scholar
Tatum, J. and Vernazza, G. (1990) (eds), The Ancient Novel. Classical Perspectives and Modern Paradigms. Proceedings of the (1989) International Conference on the Ancient Novel, Dartmouth, NH. Hanover N.H.Google Scholar
Tatum, J. and Vernazza, G. (1993) (eds), The Search for the Ancient Novel. (A selection of papers from the 1989 conference). Baltimore.Google Scholar
Teske, D. (1991), Der Roman des Longus als Werk der Kunst. Münster.Google Scholar
Thibau, R. (1965), ‘Les Métamorphoses d'Apulée et la théorie platonicienne de l'Eros’, Studia Philosophica Gandensia 3, 89–144.Google Scholar
Turasiewicz, R. (1990), ‘The problem of the style of Xenophon of Ephesus’, in Tatum and Vernazza (1990), 135–6.Google Scholar
Turcan, R. (1963), ‘Le roman initiatique’, RHR, 149–99.Google Scholar
van der Paardt, R. Th. (1971), Apuleius: Metamorphoses Book III. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
van der Paardt, R. Th. (1978), ‘Various aspects of narrative technique in Apuleius' Metamorphoses’, in Hijmans and van der PaardtGoogle Scholar
van der Paardt, R. Th. (1978). 75–94.Google Scholar
van der Paardt, R. Th. (1981), ‘The unmasked‘I’: Apuleius Met. XI.27’, Mnem. 34, 96–106.Google Scholar
van der Paardt, R. Th. (1989), ‘Three Dutch Asses’, in Hofmann (1989), 133–44.Google Scholar
van der Valk, M. (1941), ‘Remarques sur la date des Ethiopiques d'Héliodore’, Mnem. 9, 97–100.Google Scholar
van Thiel, H. (1961), ‘Uber die Textüberlieferung des Longus’, RhM 104, 356–62.Google Scholar
van Thiel, H. (1962), Das Eselsroman (2 vols). Munich.Google Scholar
Vieillefond, J.-R. (1987) (ed.), Longus. Paris.Google Scholar
Vilborg, E. (1955) (ed.), Achilles Tatius. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Vilborg, E. (1962), Achilles Tatius. A Commentary. Stockholm.Google Scholar
von Korn, M. and Reitzer, S. (1986), Concordantia Petroniana. Berlin.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G. (1970), The Roman Novel. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G. (1974), reviews van Thiel (1971), in CR n.s. 24, 215–18.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G. (1978), ‘Petronius and Apuleius’, in Hijmans and van der Paardt (1978), 17–24.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. G. (1981), ‘Apuleius and Plutarch’, in Blumenthal, H. J. and Markus, R. A. (eds), Neoplatonism and Early Christian Thought, 20–32. London.Google Scholar
Weinreich, O. (1962), Der griechische Liebesroman. Zurich.Google Scholar
Wesseling, B. (1988), ‘The audience of the ancient novel’, in Hofmann (1988), 67–80.Google Scholar
West, S. (1969), ‘The Greek version of the legend of Tefnut’, JEA 55, 161–83.Google Scholar
West, S. (1971), ‘Notes on some romance papyri’, ZPE 7, 95.Google Scholar
West, S. (1974), ‘Joseph and Asenath’, CQ N.S. 24, 70–81.Google Scholar
West, S. (1980), ‘Addendum to P. Oxy. 2466: “Sesonchosis romance”’, P. Oxy. 47, no. 3319, 11–19.Google Scholar
Wiersma, S. (1990), ‘The ancient Greek novel and its heroines: a female paradox’, Mnemosyne 43, 110–23.Google Scholar
Willis, W. H. (1990), ‘The Robinson-Cologne papyrus of Achilles Tatius’, GRBS 31, 73–102.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. (1980), ‘Lollianus and the desperadoes’, JHS 100, 155–81.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. (1982), ‘The mendacity of Kalasiris and the narrative strategy of Heliodoros' Aithiopika’, YCS 27, 93–158.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. (1984), Auctor & Actor: A Narratological Reading of Apuleius's The Golden Ass. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. J. (1990), ‘The education of Chloe: hidden injuries of sex’, in The Constraints of Desire. N.Y. and London.Google Scholar
Wlosok, A. (1969), ‘Zur Einheit der Metamorphosen des Apuleius’, Philologus 113, 68–84.Google Scholar
Wright, J. R. G. (1971), ‘Folk-tale and literary technique in Cupid and Psyche’, CQ n.s. 21, 273–84.Google Scholar
Yatromanolakis, Y. (1990) (ed.), ΆϰιλλέωςΆλεξανδϱέως Τατίου Λευϰίππη ϰαὶ Κλειτοϕών. Athens.Google Scholar
Young, D. (1968), ‘Author variants in Longus’, PCPhS n.s. 14, 65–74.Google Scholar
Young, D. (1971), ‘Second thoughts on Longus' second thoughts’, PCPhS n.s. 17, 99–107.Google Scholar
Zanetto, G. (1990), ‘Il romanzo greco: lingua e pubblico’, in Tatum and Vernazza (1990), 147–8.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (1971), ‘Petronius as paradox: anarchy and artistic integrity’, TAPA 102, 631–84.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (1990), ‘The poetics of eros: nature, art and imitation in Longus' Daphnis and Chloe’, in Halperin, D. M., Winkler, J. J. and Zeitlin, F. (eds), Before Sexuality, 417–64. Princeton.Google Scholar