Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:53:54.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Palmyra under the Aegis of Rome*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2012

Extract

In the most southerly group of desert routes between Syria and Mesopotamia Palmyra lies at the cross-roads. The north-eastward route from Damascus to Circesium is crossed by the eastward route from Emesa, now Homs, to Babylonia. Palmyra owes this key-position first to its precious springs and secondly to the fact that here the natural traffic lines from west to east debouch from the Syrian mountains into the head of the eastwardlooking basin of the Wadi el Khorr, a winter tributary of the Euphrates. Nor were these obvious routes the sole possibility. At Circesium the Euphrates may be crossed: at its eastward turn the lower river and its valley-dwellers become dominant—here runs the modern frontier between Syria and Iraq. Avoiding this control, caravan routes, negotiable solely by those with intimate knowledge of the waste and its people, lead direct to the heart of Mesopotamia and onwards to the Persian Gulf. As between East and West, Palmyra, an island in the desert, offered both a mart for exchange and an essential staging-point for direct through traffic. Its possessors were by nature masters of the situation; and, while they might be subject to the cultural or political influences of either East or West, their geographical isolation secured for them an independence founded upon pre-eminent experience of desert ways, which constituted them the natural masters and middlemen of the caravan routes that met and branched or crossed in their oasis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © I. A. Richmond 1963. Exclusive Licence to Publish: The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper was read to the Society on 19th March, 1963, as a summary of knowledge about the site to date.

References

1 For example, Sassanian silver-plate, Erdmann, K., ‘Die sasanidischen Jagdschalen,’ Jahrbuch der preussischen Kunstsammlungen, 1936, 212 ff.Google Scholar

2 CAH X, 387–97.

3 Pliny, , NH VI, 101Google Scholar: cf. Tac., Ann. III, 53.Google Scholar

4 For example, the mosaic of the harpist from the palace of Shapur I at Bischapur, von der Osten, H. H., Die Welt der Perser (1956), pl. 96Google Scholar, upper photograph.

5 Appian, , Bell. Civ. V, 9.Google Scholar

6 For Augustus, Res Gestae 29: for Tiberius, Dio Cass. liv, 9; also Res Gestae 27.

7 Res Gestae 27.

8 Tac., Ann. II, 42–3Google Scholar; Tiberius stated ‘nec posse motum Orientem nisi Germanici sapientia conponi’: there followed ‘permissae Germanico provinciae quae mari dividuntur maiusque imperium quoquo adisset’.

9 Appian, l.c. (n. 5).

10 Seyrig, H., Syrica XIII (1932), 267Google Scholar = Cantineau, J., Inventaire des inscriptions de Palmyre IX, 2Google Scholar: ‘Druso Caesari, Ti. Caesari divi Aug. f. Augusto divi Iuli nepoti, Ge[rmanico Caesari] imperatoribus posuit [Min]ucius T.f. Hor. Rufus, legatus leg. X Fretensis’.

11 Seyrig, H., Syria XII (1931), 139.Google Scholar

12 Tac., Ann. II, 26.Google Scholar

13 o.c. ibid, and II, 59–73.

14 Temple of Bel, Wiegand, T., Palmyra (1932), pl. 68Google Scholar (plan): for reliefs see Seyrig, H., Syria XV (1934), 155–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for dedication, of 6th April, A.D. 32, Cantineau, J., Syria XIV (1933), 171Google Scholar = Inventaire IX, I.

15 see note 14.

16 CIS II, 3924, 3925.

17 For the three gods, CIG XIV, 972; cf. Seyrig, H., Syria XIII (1932), 191Google Scholar, n. 6 and also Syria XXVI (1949), 29–35: for Ishtar, Seyrig, H., Syria XXXVII (1960), 6874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 C. Hopkins, Excavations at Doura-Europos, Report V, 106: cf. Rostovtzeff, M. I., Yale Classical Studies V, 226.Google Scholar

19 H. Lammens, L'Arabie occidentale avant l'Hégire, 101 ff.

20 T. Wiegand, o.c. (n. 14), pls. 68 (general), 71 (detailed).

21 ibid., pl. 69.

22 Josephus, , BJ V, 208.Google Scholar

23 For the Palmyra merlons, see T. Wiegand, o.c. (n. 14), 141, fig. 168: cf. Babylon, R. Koldewey, Das Ischtar-Tor in Babylon, Taf. 19; and Petra, Brünnow and von Domaszewski, Die Provinz Arabia, 139, figs. 120–23.

24 T. Wiegand, o.c. (n. 14), 129.

25 cf. ibid., pl. 93.

26 For traces of Christian frescoes and for texts, see Cantineau, J., Inventaire IX, 48–9Google Scholar, nos. 37, 38; for the mosque, ibid. 54, A.D. 1132–33.

27 For ceilings, see H. Seyrig, , Syria XIV (1933), 258Google Scholar, fig. 5, from the northern niche; also T. Wiegand o.c. (n. 14), 134, fig. 165.

28 T. Wiegand, o.c. (n. 14), pl. 72.

29 Syria XV (1934), pl. XXI, 3.

31 For the rafters and their position, T. Wiegand, o.c. (n. 14), 130, fig. 161, pl. LXXVI: for detailed figures and further elucidations, see Seyrig, H., Syria XV (1934)Google Scholar, pls. XVIII, XIX, XX, XXII, XXIII and fig. 2.

32 T. Wiegand, o.c. (n. 14), pls. 62–7, and also Collart, P., Annales archéologiques de Syrie VII (1957) 6790Google Scholar: for the date, see Cantineau, J., Inventaire des inscr. de Palmyre, I, 130, p. 10Google Scholar, no. 2: also IGRR III, 1054.

33 J. Cantineau, o.c. (n. 32), I, 14–15. nos. 4 and 5.

34 Collart, P., Annales archéologiques de Syrie VII (1957), 77.Google Scholar

35 ibid., 67–90, with pl. I (plan). For earlier cemetery, said to be Augustan, ibid. 86.

36 T. Wiegand, o.c. (n. 14), pls. 55–61.

37 T. Wiegand, ibid. p. 115: not illustrated.

38 Theatre, T. Wiegand, ibid. pls. 20–4.

39 Theatre stage, T. Wiegand, ibid. pl. 23.

40 T. Wiegand, ibid. pl. II.

41 Seyrig, H., CRAI 1940, 237–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; plan, 238.

42 ibid. 240.

43 For the milestone of Jan.-July, 75, see Syria XIII, H. Seyrig, 276–77.

44 SEG VII, 135, 18.

45 F. Durrbach, Choix d'inscriptions de Délos, 138: οἱ τὴν τετράγωνον ἐργαζόμενοι.

46 For the position, see CRAI 1940, 244.

47 Berytus II, 25.

48 For the siege, see SHA Aurelianus 26, I, 28, I; Zosimus, , Hist. Nov. I, 54Google Scholar, 2. The evidence cannot be brushed aside, as by van Berchem, D., Syria XXXI (1954), 258–9.Google Scholar

49 T. Wiegand, o.c. (n. 14), Taf. 27; for example nos. 173–6.

50 For Diocletian's legionary fort, see Michalowski, K., Palmyra (1960), II ff.Google Scholar; Schlumberger, D., Berytus II (1935), 163–7Google Scholar: dedication-tablet of A.D. 293–303. CIL III, 133.

51 For Odenaethus, Cantineau, J., Inventaire des inscriptions de Palmyre III, 19Google Scholar, styled ‘King of Kings and Restorer of the Orient’ cf. Schlumberger, D., Bulletin d'Études orientales IX (1942–3), 42–3.Google Scholar

52 van Berchem, D., Syria XXXI (1954), 256Google Scholar, fig. 1.

53 Syria XXVII (1950), 240.

54 T. Wiegand, o.c. (n. 14), 14–16: the work is thought to be of the sixteenth century.

55 Sauvaget, J., Syria XII (1931), 143–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

56 Günther, A., Beiträge zur Geschichte der Kriege zwischen Römern und Parthern (1922), 113120Google Scholar: cf. Lambrechts, P. L'Antiquité classique, III (1934), 192201.Google Scholar

57 Seyrig, H., ‘Textes relatifs à la garrison romaine à Palmyra’, Syria XIV (1933), 167, pl. XX, I.Google Scholar

58 ibid. 160, no. 3, pl, XX, 2.

59 ibid. 164, no. 8.

60 ILS 8869: for its sojourn at Coptos, see J. Lesquier, L'armée romaine d'Égypte, 78.

61 H. Seyrig, o.c. (n. 57), 166, no. 10.

62 ibid. 161, nos. 4, 5 (ala Ulpia Singularium): 162, no. 6 (ala Flavia Agrippiana). For the military camels, see Berytus III (1936), 116, pl. XXIV, 1 and 2.

63 Seyrig, H., Syria XIV (1933), 154.Google Scholar

64 ILS 8869; cf. Syria XIV (1933), 159.

65 CIL III, 118 = 141563.

66 Hadrian seems undoubtedly to have created the numeri (H. T. Rowell, P-W, XVII, 1332–33). For the ala Ulpia dromedariorum Palmyrenorum see Starcky, J., Inventaire des inscriptions de Palmyre X, 128Google Scholar: cf. CIL XVI, dipl. 106.

67 De mun. castr. 29; 30.

68 Welles, C. B., Fink, R. O., Gilliam, J. F., Excavations at Dura-Europos, Final Report V, I, 251Google Scholar, fragment 66EE: for the numbering of the cohort, ibid. 27.

69 H. T. Rowell, P-W XVII, 2350.

70 ibid. 2549–52.

71 For house-plans see Gabriel, A., Syria VII (1926), 87Google Scholar, fig. 5 (House 45), and pl. XV (House 39, wrongly numbered 35).

72 For a convenient list of the known Palmyrene tribes, J. G. Février, Essai sur l'histoire politique et économique de Palmyre, 9–10.

73 GIS 3915 = Cantineau, J., Inventaire IX, 13.Google Scholar

74 Inscriptions of A.D. 179 by the Zabdibol, Beni, Cantineau, J., Inventaire V, 1Google Scholar, 2 and 4.

75 Colonnades, T. Wiegand, o.c. (n. 14), pls. 11–17.

76 Hamel, F., Lady Hester Lucy Stanhope (1913), 157Google Scholar, quoting Dr. C. L. Meryon's letter of 22nd June, 1813: ‘Each pillar of the colonnade … has got a projecting pedestal. … Upon these pedestals, … immediately before arriving at the Arch of Triumph, the most beautiful girls of the place, selected for that purpose, had been planted, with garlands in their hands, and in the most graceful postures.’

77 T. Wiegand, o.c. (n. 14), pl. II.

78 T. Wiegand, o.c. (n. 14), 24–5, Abb. 23–4.

79 T. Wiegand, o.c. (n. 14), Taf. 10.

80 Syria XII (1931), 139.

81 Syria XII (1931), 106–8, for a full text, by R. Mouterde: also SEG VII, 135. For the position of Vologesias, see Maricq, A., Syria XXXVI (1959), 264 ff.Google Scholar

82 Syria XIII (1932), 289; Starcky, J., Inventaire des inscriptions de Palmyre, X, 44.Google Scholar

83 J. Starcky, ibid. X, 38, σατράπην Θιλουανῶν Μεερεδάτου βασιλέως Σπασινοῦ Χάρακος.

84 J. Starcky, o.c., 81.

85 ibid. 96: ἔμποροι οἱ ἀναχθέντες ἀπὸ Σκυθίας ἐν πλύω Ὀναίνου Ἀδδουδάνου.

86 ibid. 29: Ἀντιοχέων βουλευτἡν, τεταρτώνην: cf. 113, of A.D. 174, where τεταρτώνης corresponds to mancipi IIII mer(caturae). For Leuke Komé, Periplus Maris Erythraei 19.

87 IGR III, 1056; Corpus inscr. Semit. II, 3913: see also Seyrig, H., Antiquités syriennes III (1946), 142 ff.Google Scholar

88 Syria XVII (1936), 246, pl. XLVI

89 Seyrig, H., ‘Armes et costumes iraniens de Palmyre,’ Syria XVIII (2937), 431Google Scholar; for a comparison with the statue from Shami see Syria XX (1939), 180, pl. XXV.

90 ibid. 9, fig. 1; 16, pl. IV; 19, fig. 10; 26, fig. 15.

91 Syria XVIII (1937), 18, pl. V.

92 Syria XVII (1936), 248, pl. XLVII 2, the lady Akhma and companion (our pl. II, I).

93 For temple-tombs, see T. Wiegand, o.c. (n. 14), pls. 36, 38–44.

94 T. Wiegand, o.c. (n. 14), pls. 29–35. For a valuable discussion of the type, see Will, E., Syria XXVI (1949), 87116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

95 Josephus, , BJ V, 162Google Scholar,

96 Dedication, Cantineau, J., Inventaire des inscriptions de Palmyre IV, 27.Google Scholar

97 Syria XVII (1936), 230, pls. XXVI, XXVII, XXXIV (section), the hypogeum of Iarhai.

98 J. Strzygowski, Orient oder Rom (1901), Taf. 1, dated to A.D. 259.

99 cf. Syria XVIII (1937), pl. IV.

100 ibid.

101 SHA, XXX tyranni, 15: for an important discussion and commentary by Seyrig, see Syria XVIII (1937), 1–4.

102 For a detailed study of the Palmyrene dynasty, see Schlumberger, D., Bulletin d'études orientales IX (19421943), 3582.Google Scholar

103 Michalowski, K., Palmyre (1960), 181.Google Scholar