Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:11:13.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Not Census but Deductio: Reconsidering the ‘Ara of Domitius Ahenobarbus’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2018

Dominik Maschek
Dominik Maschek*
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since its rediscovery in the late nineteenth century, the ‘Ara of Domitius Ahenobarbus’ has become a keystone in the history of Roman republican art. Following the seminal interpretation of Alfred von Domaszewski, the monument is usually understood as commemorating the key stages of the Roman census. This paper offers a fundamental reappraisal of the Ara's imagery, based on an iconographic analysis which takes into account all relevant signs of rank and status such as shoes, clothing and other attributes. From this it becomes clear that none of the three protagonists on the Ara can be identified as a censor. Consequently, the monument neither commemorated a census nor was it a censorial location. Instead, I suggest that the Ara actually shows another important political event, namely the deductio of a Roman colony which I tentatively identify as the colonia Neptunia founded by Gaius Gracchus in 123 b.c.

Keywords

late Roman RepublicRoman republican artRoman magistratesrepublican censusrepublican colonisationGaius Gracchus
Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 108 , November 2018 , pp. 27 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Anti, C. 1924–25: ‘Il presunto altare di Domizio Ahenobarbo’, Atti del Reale Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti 84, 2, 473–83.Google Scholar
Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S. 1998: Religions of Rome I, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bianchi Bandinelli, R. 1966: ‘Introduzione. Sculture municipali dell'area sabellica tra l'età di Cesare e quella di Nerone’, Studi Miscellanei 10, 9–20.Google Scholar
Bianchi Bandinelli, R. 1969: Rome. Le centre du pouvoir, Paris.Google Scholar
Bispham, E. 2006: ‘Coloniam deducere: how Roman was Roman colonization during the middle Republic?’, in Bradley and Wilson 2006, 73–160.Google Scholar
Bispham, E. 2009: From Asculum to Actium: The Municipalization of Italy from the Social War to Augustus, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bleicken, J. 1998: Gesammelte Schriften II, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Böhm, F. 1927: ‘Lustratio’, RE 13.2, 2029–39.Google Scholar
Boos, M. 2011: Heiligtümer römischer Bürgerkolonien. Archäologische Untersuchungen zur sakralen Ausstattung republikanischer coloniae civium Romanorum, Internationale Archäologie 119, Rahden/Westf.Google Scholar
Bradley, G. 2006: ‘Colonization and identity in republican Italy’, in Bradley and Wilson 2006, 161–87.Google Scholar
Bradley, G., and Wilson, J. P. (eds) 2006: Greek and Roman Colonization: Origins, Ideologies and Interactions, Swansea.Google Scholar
Briquel, D. 1987: ‘I riti di fondazione’, in Tarquinia, ricerche, scavi e prospettive. Atti del convegno internazionale di studi “La Lombardia per gli Etruschi”, Milano 24–25 giugno 1986, Milan, 171–90.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. 1951: The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, New York.Google Scholar
Brunn, H. 1870: Beschreibung der Glyptothek König Ludwig's I. zu München, Munich.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1962: ‘The army and the land in the Roman revolution’, Journal of Roman Studies 52, 69–86.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1971: Italian Manpower, 225 B.C.–A.D. 14, Oxford.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, F. 1945: ‘Il problema dell'Ara di Domizio Enobarbo’, Arti Figurative 1.4, 181–96.Google Scholar
Castagnoli, F. 1946: ‘Il Campo Marzio nell'antichità’, Memorie della Accademia nazionale dei Lincei. Classe di scienze morali, storiche e filologiche 8.1, 93–193.Google Scholar
Clark, A. J. 2007: Divine Qualities: Cult and Community in Republican Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1968: ‘L’ “ara di Domizio Enobarbo” e la cultura artistica in Roma nel II secolo a. C.’, Dialoghi d'Archeologia 2, 302–68.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1970–1971: ‘Classe dirigente romana e arti figurative’, Dialoghi d'Archeologia 4–5, 241–65.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1997: Il Campo Marzio. Dalle origini alla fine della repubblica, Rome.Google Scholar
Coles, A. J. 2017: ‘Founding colonies and fostering careers in the middle Republic’, Classical Journal 112, 3, 280–317.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H. 1974: Roman Republican Coinage (2 vols), Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crawford, M. H. 1996: Roman Statutes (2 vols), London.Google Scholar
Dabrowa, E. 2004: ‘Le vexillum sur les monnaies coloniales (IIe–IIIe s. après J.–C.)’, Latomus 63, 394–405.Google Scholar
de Ligt, L. 2012: Peasants, Citizens and Soldiers: Studies in the Demographic History of Roman Italy 225 BC–AD 100, Cambridge.Google Scholar
de Wahl, Th. 1896: Quomodo monstra marina artifices graeci finxerint, Bonn.Google Scholar
Dietz, K. 1999/2000: ‘Religiöse Aspekte bei Stadtgründungen’, Jahrbuch Heidenheim 8, 22–39.Google Scholar
Di Stefano Manzella, I. 1994: ‘Accensi velati consulibus apparentes ad sacra. Proposta per la soluzione di un problema dibattuto’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 101, 261–79.Google Scholar
Dubourdieu, A. 1986: ‘Cinctus Gabinus’, Latomus 45, 3–20.Google Scholar
Dubourdieu, A. 1988: ‘Deux définitions du cinctus Gabinus’, in Porte, D. and Néraudau, J.-P. (eds), Hommages à Henri Le Bonniec. Res Sacrae, Brussels, 163–70.Google Scholar
Eckstein, A. M. 1979: ‘The foundation day of Roman coloniae', California Studies in Classical Antiquity 12, 85–97.Google Scholar
Felletti-Maj, B. M. 1977: La tradizione italica nell'arte romana, Rome.Google Scholar
Fittschen, K. 2008: ‘Der Arringatore. Kein römischer Bürger?’, in La Rocca, E., León, P. and Presicce, C. Parisi (eds), Le due patrie acquisite. Studi di archeologia dedicati a Walter Trillmich, Rome, 175–83.Google Scholar
Flashar, M. 2007: ‘Formenspektrum, Themenvielfalt, Funktionszusammenhänge. Beispiele späthellenistische Skulptur’, in Bol, C. (ed.), Die Geschichte der antiken Bildhauerkunst 3: Hellenistische Plastik, Mainz, 333–72.Google Scholar
Fless, F. 1995: Opferdiener und Kultmusiker auf stadtrömischen historischen Reliefs, Mainz.Google Scholar
Fless, F. 2004: ‘Römische Prozessionen’, ThesCRA 1, 33–58.Google Scholar
Flower, H. 2006: The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Freier, H. 1963: Caput velare, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Froning, H. 1981: Marmor-Schmuckreliefs mit griechischen Mythen im 1. Jahrhundert vor Christus, Mainz.Google Scholar
Fuchs, W. 1959: Die Vorbilder der neuattischen Reliefs, Berlin.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, H. 1931: Philoxenos von Eretria, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Furtwängler, A. 1896: ‘Der Münchener Poseidonfries und der Neptuntempel des Domitius’, in Furtwängler, A., Intermezzi, Leipzig/Berlin, 33–48.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. 1976: Republican Rome, the Army, and the Allies, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. 1990: ‘Il tentativo dei Gracchi’, in Schiavone, A. (ed.), Storia di Roma 2. L'impero mediterraneo 1. La repubblica imperiale, Turin, 671–89.Google Scholar
Gabelmann, H. 1977: ‘Die ritterliche Trabea’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 92, 322–74.Google Scholar
Gargola, D. J. 1995: Lands, Laws, and Gods. Magistrates and Ceremony in the Regulation of Public Lands in Republican Rome, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Gasperini, L. 1971: ‘Il municipio tarentino: Ricerche epigrafiche’, in Terza Miscellanea Greca et Romana, Rome, 143–209.Google Scholar
Ghedini, F. 1988: ‘Il Nettuno sul carro del Museo di Aquileia. Divagazioni intorno a un motivo iconografico’, Aquileia Nostra 59, 182–219.Google Scholar
Giannelli, G. 1963: Culti e miti della Magna Grecia (2nd edn), Florence.Google Scholar
Goethert, F. W. 1931: Zur Kunst der römischen Republik, Berlin.Google Scholar
Goette, H. R. 1988: ‘Mulleus, embas, calceus. Ikonografische Studien zu römischem Schuhwerk’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 103, 401–64.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. 1992: Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Hafner, G. 1972: ‘Zwei römische Reliefwerke. Fixpunkte für die Kunstgeschichte der römischen Republik’, Aachener Kunstblätter 43, 97–124.Google Scholar
Holliday, P. J. 2002: The Origins of Roman Historical Commemoration in the Visual Arts, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 1979: ‘Beobachtungen zu römischen historischen Denkmälern’, Archäologischer Anzeiger 1979, 337–48.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 1984: Staatsdenkmal und Publikum. Vom Untergang der Republik bis zur Festigung des Kaisertums in Rom, Konstanz.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 2009: ‘Denkmäler und Konsens. Die sensible Balance von Verdienst und Macht’, in Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (ed.), Eine politische Kultur (in) der Krise? Die “letzte Generation” der römischen Republik, Munich, 161–81.Google Scholar
Huet, V., Scheid, J., Prescendi, F., Siebert, A. V., van Andriga, W., and Wyler, St. 2004: ‘Les sacrifices dans le monde romain’, ThesCRA 1, 183–235.Google Scholar
Jahn, O. 1854: ‘Über ein Marmorrelief der Glyptothek in München’, Berichte über die Verhandlungen der königlich sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-historische Classe 5, 160–94.Google Scholar
Kähler, H. 1966: Seethiasos und Census. Die Reliefs aus dem Palazzo Santa Croce in Rom, Berlin.Google Scholar
Keppie, L. 1984: The Making of the Roman Army: From Republic to Empire, London.Google Scholar
Kosmopoulos, D. 2012: ‘Il tempio presso S. Salvatore in Campo: lo stato della questione’, Bullettino della Commissione Archeologica Comunale di Roma 113, 7–41.Google Scholar
Kuttner, A. 1993: ‘Some new grounds for narrative: Marcus Antonius's base (the Ara Domitii Ahenobarbi) and republican biographies’, in Holliday, P. J. (ed.), Narrative and Event in Ancient Art, Cambridge, 198–229.Google Scholar
Latte, K. 1960: Römische Religionsgeschichte, Munich.Google Scholar
Lattimore, St. 1976: The Marine Thiasos in Greek Sculpture, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Levick, B. 1967: Roman Colonies in Southern Asia Minor, Oxford.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. 2007: Roman Questions II: Selected Papers, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. 1992: Judicial Reform and Land Reform in the Roman Republic, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. 1994: ‘Political history, 146–95 B.C.’, CAH 2 IX, Cambridge, 40–103.Google Scholar
Lippolis, E. 2004: ‘Triumphata Corintho. La preda bellica e i doni di Lucio Mummio Achaico’, Archeologia Classica 55, 25–82.Google Scholar
Lo Cascio, E. 2001: ‘Recruitment and the size of the Roman population from the third to the first century BCE’, in Scheidel, W. (ed.), Debating Roman Demography, Leiden, 111–37.Google Scholar
Lohmann, H. 2009: ‘Die sogenannte Domitius-Ara’, in Einicke, R., Lehmann, St., Löhr, H., Mehnert, G., Mehnert, A. and Slawisch, A. (eds), Zurück zum Gegenstand. Festschrift für A. E. Furtwängler, Langenweißbach, 109–22.Google Scholar
Löwy, E. 1928: Die Anfänge des Triumphbogens, Vienna.Google Scholar
Mattingly, H. B. 1922: ‘Some historical coins of the late Republic’, Journal of Roman Studies 12, 230–9.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. 1993: ‘Ein Denkmal des consensus civium’, Bullettino della Commissione Archeologica Comunale di Roma 95, 45–68.Google Scholar
Mingazzini, P. 1946: ‘Scopas Minore’, Arti Figurative 2, 3/4, 137–48.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. 1871: Römisches Staatsrecht I. Die Magistratur, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. 1874: Römisches Staatsrecht II. Die einzelnen Magistraturen, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. 1888: Römisches Staatsrecht III.2. Bürgerschaft und Senat, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1976: Le métier de citoyen dans la Rome républicaine (2nd edn), Paris.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, R. M. 1961: ‘Lustrum condere’, Journal of Roman Studies 51, 31–9.Google Scholar
Overbeck, J. 1873: Griechische Kunstmythologie II.2, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Piganiol, A. 1934: ‘Ara Martis’, Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome. Antiquité 2, 21–32.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1971: ‘The literary sources for the pre-Marian army’, Papers of the British School at Rome 39, 13–31.Google Scholar
Roselaar, S. T. 2010: Public Land in the Roman Republic: A Social and Economic History of ager publicus in Italy, 396–89 B.C., Oxford.Google Scholar
Rosenberger, V. 1998: Gezähmte Götter. Das Prodigienwesen der römischen Republik, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. S. 2004: Rome at War: Farms, Families and Death in the Middle Republic, Chapel Hill/London.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 1990: Domi militiae. Die religiöse Konstruktion des Krieges in Rom, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ryan, F. 1998: Rank and Participation in the Republican Senate, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ryan, F. 2009: ‘Die Aussage über Münzbilder des L. Cassius Caeicianus’, Schweizer Münzblätter 59, 35–42.Google Scholar
Saladino, V. 2004: ‘Purification/Purification/Reinigung/Purificazione: Mondo romano’, ThesCRA 2, 63–87.Google Scholar
Salmon, E. T. 1969: Roman Colonization under the Republic, London.Google Scholar
Santangelo, F. 2007: ‘A survey of recent scholarship on the age of the Gracchi (1985–2005)’, Topoi 15, 465–510.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Th. 1989: Imperii insignia. Sella curulis und fasces. Zur Repräsentation römischer Magistrate, Mainz.Google Scholar
Schefold, K. 1964: ‘Zur Basis des Domitius Ahenobarbus’, in Sandler, L. Freeman (ed.), Essays in Memory of K. Lehmann, New York, 279–87.Google Scholar
Schmid, St. G. 2007–2008: ‘Et in consulatu sexto censum populi conlega M. Agrippa egi. Ein neuer Vorschlag zum Kontext der Santacroce-Reliefs’, Boreas 30–31, 41–71.Google Scholar
Scholz, U. W. 1973: ‘Suovetaurilia und Solitaurilia’, Philologus 117, 3–28.Google Scholar
Scott Ryberg, I. 1955: Rites of the State Religion in Roman Art, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 22, Rome.Google Scholar
Settis, S. 2003: Misurare la terra. Centuriazione e coloni nel mondo romano, Modena.Google Scholar
Sieveking, J. 1910: ‘Der sogenannte Altar des Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus’, Jahreshefte des Österreichischen Archäologischen Instituts 13, 95–101.Google Scholar
Simon, E. 1990: Die Götter der Römer, Munich.Google Scholar
Sisani, S. 2014: ‘Qua aratrum ductum est. La colonizzazione romana come chiave interpretativa della Roma delle origini’, in Stek, T. D. and Pelgrom, J. (eds), Roman Republican Colonization. New Perspectives from Archaeology and Ancient History, Papers of the Royal Netherland Institute in Rome 62, Rome, 357–404.Google Scholar
Stark, B. 1864: ‘Zur Archäologie der Kunst II. Skopas und seine Werke’, Philologus 21, 415–53.Google Scholar
Stilp, F. 2001: Mariage et suovetaurilia. Etude sur le soi-disant “Autel de Domitius Ahenobarbus”, Rome.Google Scholar
Suolahti, J. 1963: The Roman Censors: A Study on Social Structure, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Thein, A. 2011: ‘Sulla's veteran settlement policy’, in Daubner, F. (ed.), Militärsiedlungen und Territorialherrschaft in der Antike, Berlin/New York, 79–99.Google Scholar
Torelli, M. 1982: Typology and Structure of Roman Historical Reliefs, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Tortorici, E. 1988: ‘Il tempio presso S. Salvatore in Campo. V. Vespignani ed Ermodoro di Salamina’, in Topografia Romana. Ricerche e discussioni, Florence, 59–75.Google Scholar
Tucci, P. L. 1997: ‘Dov'erano il tempio di Nettuno e la nave di Enea?’, Bullettino della Commissione Archeologica Comunale di Roma 98, 15–42.Google Scholar
Varner, E. R. 2004: Mutilation and Transformation: damnatio memoriae and Roman Imperial Portraiture, Leiden/Boston.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. 1975: ‘Sacrificium lustrale’, Mededelingen van het Nederlands Instituut te Rome 37, 97–115.Google Scholar
Vessberg, O. 1941: Studien zur Kunstgeschichte der römischen Republik, Lund and Leipzig.Google Scholar
von Domaszewski, A. 1909: ‘Die Triumphstraße auf dem Marsfelde’, Archiv für Religionswissenschaften 12, 67–82.Google Scholar
von Urlichs, L. 1863: Skopas. Leben und Werke, Greifswald.Google Scholar
Weickert, C. 1925: ‘Ein römisches Relief aus der Zeit Caesars’, in Festschrift P. Arndt, Munich, 48–61.Google Scholar
Wienholz, H. 2014: ‘Geschichte Baalbeks in römischer Zeit’, in Van Ess, M. and Rheidt, K. (eds), Baalbek – Heliopolis. 10 000 Jahre Stadtgeschichte, Darmstadt, 146–57.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1974: ‘Legendary genealogies in late-republican Rome’, Greece and Rome 21, 153–64.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1976: ‘Two questions on the Circus Flaminius’, Papers of the British School at Rome 44, 44–7.Google Scholar
Wolters, P. 1912: Illustrierter Katalog der K. Glyptothek zu München, Munich.Google Scholar
Wrede, H. 1988: ‘Zur Trabea’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 103, 381–400.Google Scholar
Wünsche, R. 1994: ‘Domizio Enobarbo’, EAA Suppl. 2, 393–5.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1987: Augustus und die Macht der Bilder, Munich.Google Scholar
Zevi, F. 1976: ‘L'identificazione del tempio di Marte “in Circo” e altre osservazioni’, in L'Italie préromaine et la Rome républicaine. Mélanges offerts à J. Heurgon 2, Rome, 1047–64.Google Scholar
Zevi, F. 1996: ‘Mars in circo’, LTUR 3, 226–9.Google Scholar