No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Beyond social and functional interpretations of wall paintings: mythological imagery in the tablinum at Pompeii and Herculaneum
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 January 2022
Abstract
This paper investigates the mythological wall paintings decorating the room known as the tablinum in atrium houses at Pompeii and Herculaneum. Scholars have considered the tablinum part of the “public” section of the house and have linked this room to the formal morning greeting, or salutatio, despite the fact that no ancient literary source mentions the tablinum in connection with this daily ritual. These assumptions have conditioned the way in which scholars have interpreted the decoration, which is analyzed in relation to the social activities supposedly associated with this type of room or discussed in terms of moral ideals and social values. This study demonstrates that the figurative imagery within the tablinum does not necessarily relate to social practices in that space but instead informs us about a common visual vocabulary shared by different strata of society.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Allison, P. M. 1992. “The relationship between wall-decoration and room-type in Pompeian houses: A case study of the Casa della Caccia Antica.” JRA 5: 235–49.Google Scholar
Allison, P. M. 1993. “How do we identify the use of space in Roman housing?” In Functional and Spatial Analysis of Wall Painting: Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Wall Painting, ed. Moormann, E. M., 1–8. Leiden: BABESCH.Google Scholar
Allison, P. M. 2001. “Using the material and written sources: Turn of the millennium approaches to Roman domestic space.” AJA 105, no. 2: 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, P. M. 2004. Pompeian Households: An Analysis of the Material Culture. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, UCLA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anguissola, A. 2010. Intimità a Pompei. Riservatezza, condivisione e prestigio negli ambienti ad alcova di Pompei. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. 1994. “The Roman house as memory theater: The House of the Tragic Poet in Pompeii.” ArtB 76, no. 2: 225–56.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. 1995. “Greek masterpieces and Roman recreative fictions.” HSCP 97: 79–120.Google Scholar
Beyen, H. G. 1938–60. Die Pompejanische Wanddekoration. Vom zweiten bis zum vierten Stil. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, P. 2013. Cities of Vesuvius: Pompeii and Herculaneum. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brilliant, R. 1984. Visual Narratives: Storytelling in Etruscan and Roman Art. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. R. 1991. The Houses of Roman Italy 100 B.C.–A.D. 250: Ritual, Space, and Decoration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. R. 2003. Art in the Lives of Ordinary Romans. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. R. 2014. “Domus/single family house.” In A Companion to Roman Architecture, ed. Ulrich, R. B. and Quenemoen, C. K., 324–62. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. 1990. “Fatal charades: Roman executions staged as mythological enactments.” JRA 80: 44–73.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. F. 2007. “Closely watched households: Visibility, exposure and private power in the Roman domus.” PastPres 197: 3–33.Google Scholar
Cova, E. 2015. “Stasis and change in Roman domestic space: The alae of Pompeii's Regio VI.” AJA 119, no. 1: 69–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Caro, S. 2015. “Excavation and conservation at Pompeii: A conflicted history.” Fasti Online Documents and Research: Archaeological Conservation Series 3. International Center for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property. http://www.fastionline.org/docs/FOLDER-con-2015-3.pdf.Google Scholar
Dickmann, J.-A. 1999. Domus frequentata. Anspruchsvolles Wohnen in pompejanischen Stadthaus. Munich: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.Google Scholar
Dickmann, J.-A. 2011. “Space and social relations in the Roman West.” In A Companion to Families in the Greek and Roman Worlds, ed. Rawson, B., 52–72. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. E. 1952. The Nature of Roman Comedy: A Study in Popular Entertainment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dunbabin, K. M. D. 2016. Theater and Spectacle in the Art of the Roman Empire. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dwyer, E. 1991. “The Pompeian atrium house in theory and practice.” In Roman Art in the Private Sphere, ed. Gazda, E., 25–48. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, S. J. R. 2018. The Roman Retail Revolution: The Socio-Economic World of the Taberna. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1995. Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Esposito, D. 2014. La pittura di Ercolano. Studi SAP 33. Rome: L'Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Franchi dall'Orto, L., ed. 1993. Ercolano 1738–1988. 250 anni di ricerca archeologica. Atti del Convegno Internazionale Ravello–Ercolano–Napoli–Pompei, 30 Ottobre–5 Novembre 1988. Rome: L'Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. L. 1987. “Pantomimists at Pompeii: Actius Anicetus and his troupe.” AJP 108, no. 1: 95–107.Google Scholar
Garelli, M.-H. 2007. Danser le mythe. La pantomime et sa réception dans la culture antique. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Goldbeck, F. 2010. Salutationes. Die Morgenbegrüssungen in Rom in der Republik und der frühen Kaiserzeit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Hall, E., and Wyles, R., eds. 2008. New Directions in Ancient Pantomime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallett, C. H. 2005. “Emulation versus replication: Redefining Roman copying.” JRA 18: 419–35.Google Scholar
Heslin, P. J. 2002. The Transvestite Achilles: Gender and Genre in Statius’ “Achilleid.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heslin, P. J. 2015. The Museum of Augustus: The Temple of Apollo in Pompeii, the Portico of Philippus in Rome, and Latin Poetry. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum.Google Scholar
Hodske, J. 2007. Mythologische Bildthemen in den Häusern Pompejis. Die Bedeutung der zentralen Mythenbilder für die Bewohner Pompejis. Ruhpolding: Franz Philipp Rutzen.Google Scholar
Jolivet, V. 2011. Tristes portiques. Sur le plan canonique de la maison étrusque et romaine des origines au principat d'Auguste. Rome: École française de Rome.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. 2014. “Ovidian myth on Pompeian walls.” In The Handbook of the Reception of Ovid, ed. Miller, J. F. and Newlands, C. E., 36–54. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kousser, R. 2007. “Mythological group portraits in Antonine Rome: The performance of myth.” AJA 111, no. 4: 673–91.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, A. 1985, The First Style in Pompeii: Painting and Architecture. Rome: L'Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1997. “Oecus on Ibycus: Investigating the vocabulary of the Roman house.” In Sequence and Space in Pompeii, ed. Bon, S. E. and Rick, J., 50–72. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 2004. The Social Life of Painting in Ancient Rome and on the Bay of Naples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ling, R. 1995. “The decoration of Roman triclinia.” In In Vino Veritas, ed. Murray, O. and Tecusan, M., 239–51. London: British School at Rome.Google Scholar
Longfellow, B., and Perry, E., eds. 2018. Roman Artists, Patrons, and Public Consumption. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. 2008. Bilder machen Räume. Mythenbilder in pompeianischen Häusern. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maiuri, A. 1958. Ercolano. I nuovi scavi 1927–1958. Rome: Istituto Poligrafico dello Stato.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. 2011. Roman Republican Theatre: A History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mau, A. 1882. Geschichte der dekorativen Wandmalerei in Pompeji. Berlin: Reimer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mau, A. 1899. Pompeii: Its Life and Art. Trans. Kelsey, F. W.. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Moormann, E. M., ed. 1993. Functional and Spatial Analysis of Wall Painting: Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Ancient Wall Painting. Leiden: BABESCH.Google Scholar
Moormann, E. M. 2011. Divine Interiors: Mural Paintings in Greek and Roman Sanctuaries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Moormann, E. M. 2015. Pompeii's Ashes: The Reception of the Cities Buried by Vesuvius in Literature, Music, Drama. Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moormann, E. M. 2018. “Beyond the Four Styles: Reflections on periodizations and other matters in Roman wall painting.” In Pictores per provincias II. Status quaestionis. Actes du 13e Colloque de l'Association Internationale pour la Peinture Murale Antique (AIPMA) Université de Lausanne, 12–16 septembre 2016, ed. Dubois, Y. and Niffeler, U., 389–404. Basel: Archéologie Suisse.Google Scholar
Nevett, L. 1997. “Perceptions of domestic space in Roman Italy.” In The Roman Family in Italy: Status, Sentiment, Space, ed. Rawson, B. and Weaver, P., 281–98. Oxford: Parkin.Google Scholar
Newby, Z. 2016. Greek Myths in Roman Art and Culture: Imagery, Values and Identity in Italy, 50 BC–AD 250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gli ornati delle pareti ed i pavimenti delle stanze dell'antica Pompei incisi in rame. 1838. Naples: Stamperia Reale.Google Scholar
Overbeck, J. 1856. Pompeji in seinen Gebäuden, Alterthümern und Kunstwerken für Kunst- und Alterthumsfreunde. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
Overbeck, J., and Mau, A.. 1884. Pompeji in seinen Gebäuden, Alterthümern und Kunstwerken. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
Pesando, F. 1997. Domus. Edilizia privata e società Pompeiana fra III e I secolo a.C. Rome: L'Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Pirson, F. 2007. “Shops and industries.” In The World of Pompeii, ed. Dobbins, J. J. and Foss, P. F., 457–73. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pugliese Carratelli, G., and Baldassare, I., eds. 1990–2003. Pompei. Pitture e mosaici. Rome: Istituto della enciclopedia italiana.Google Scholar
Romizzi, L. 2006a. “La Casa dei Dioscuri di Pompei (VI.9.6-7): Una nuova lettura.” In Contributi di Archeologia Vesuviana II, ed. Marcattili, F. and Romizzi, L., 77–160. Rome: L'Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Romizzi, L. 2006b. Programmi decorativi di III e IV stile a Pompei. Un'analisi sociologica ed iconologica. Naples: Loffredo.Google Scholar
Scagliarini, D. C. 1974–76. “Spazio e decorazione nella pittura pompeiana.” Palladio 23–25: 3–44.Google Scholar
Sewell, J. 2010. The Formation of Roman Urbanism, 338–200 B.C.: Between Contemporary Foreign Influence and Roman Tradition. JRA Suppl. 79. Portsmouth, RI: JRA.Google Scholar
Spinelli, A. 2019. “The tablinum: a space and stage for ‘private’ and ‘public’ rituals in the houses of Pompeii and Herculaneum.” PhD diss., Univ. of Southern California.Google Scholar
Squire, M. 2016. “Ignotum per ignotius? Pompeii, Vergil, and the ‘Museum of Augustus.’” JRA 29: 598–606.Google Scholar
Starks, J. H. 2008. “Pantomime actresses in Latin inscriptions.” In New Directions in Ancient Pantomime, ed. Hall, E. and Wyles, R., 110–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strocka, V. M. 1997. “Mars and Venus in Bildprogrammen pompejanisher Häuser.” In I temi figurativi nella pittura parietale antica (IV sec. a.C–IV sec. d.C.). Atti del VI Convegno internazionale sulla pittura parietale antica. Bologna, 10–23 settembre 1995, ed. Scagliarini, D., 129–34. Imola: University Press Bologna.Google Scholar
Strocka, V. M. 2007. “Domestic decoration: Painting and the ‘Four Styles.’” In The World of Pompeii, ed. Dobbins, J. J. and Foss, P. F., 302–22. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Swetnam-Burland, M. 2018. “Marriage divine? Narratives of the courtship of Mars and Venus in Roman painting and poetry.” In Roman Artists, Patrons, and Public Consumption: Familiar Works Reconsidered, ed. Longfellow, B. and Perry, E., 166–90. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Thébert, Y. 1993. “Private and public spaces: The components of the domus.” In Roman Art in Context: An Anthology, ed. D'Ambra, E., 213–37. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Thiermann, E. 2005. “Ethnic identity in archaic Pompeii.” In SOMA 2003: Symposium on Mediterranean Archaeology. Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of Postgraduate Researchers at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 21st–23rd February 2003, ed. Briault, C., Green, J., Kaldelis, A., and Stellatou, A., 157–60. Oxford: BAR International Series.Google Scholar
Toepfer, K. 2019. Pantomime: The History and Metamorphosis of a Theatrical Ideology. San Francisco: Vosuri Media.Google Scholar
Trimble, J. 2002. “Greek myth, gender, and social structure in a Roman house: Two paintings of Achilles at Pompeii.” In The Ancient Art of Emulation: Studies in Artistic Originality and Tradition from the Present to Classical Antiquity, ed. Gazda, E. K., 225–48. MAAR Suppl. 1. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Tuori, K., and Nissin, L., eds. 2015. Public and Private in the Roman House and Society. JRA Suppl. 102. Portsmouth, RI: JRA.Google Scholar
Valladares, H. 2012. “Elegy, art and the viewer.” In A Companion to Roman Love Elegy, ed. Gold, B. K., 318–38. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1994. Houses and Society in Pompeii and Herculaneum. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1996. “Engendering the Roman house.” In I, Claudia: Women in Ancient Rome, ed. Kleiner, D. E. E. and Matheson, S. B., 104–15. New Haven: Yale University Art Gallery.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2007. “The development of the Campanian house.” In The World of Pompeii, ed. Dobbins, J. J. and Foss, P. F., 279–91. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2008. Rome's Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2011. “Pompeian identities: Between Oscan, Samnite, Greek, Roman, and Punic.” In Cultural Identity in the Ancient Mediterranean, ed. Gruen, E. S., 415–27. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2015. “What makes a Roman house a ‘Roman house’?” In Public and Private in the Roman House and Society, ed. Tuori, K. and Nissin, L., 177–86. JRA Suppl. 102. Portsmouth, RI: JRA.Google Scholar
Zaccaria Ruggiu, A. 1995. Spazio pubblico e spazio privato nella città romana. Rome: École française de Rome.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1979. “Die Villa als Vorbild des späten pompejanischen Wohngeschmacks.” In JdI 94: 460–523.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar