Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T11:23:52.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Egyptian Art (as Greek Art) as Roman Art: historiographies and potential futures - S. K. Pearson 2021. The Triumph and Trade of Egyptian Objects in Rome: Collecting Art in the Ancient Mediterranean. Berlin: De Gruyter. Viii + 264 pp. ISBN 978-3-11-070040-4.

Review products

S. K. Pearson 2021. The Triumph and Trade of Egyptian Objects in Rome: Collecting Art in the Ancient Mediterranean. Berlin: De Gruyter. Viii + 264 pp. ISBN 978-3-11-070040-4.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2024

Erin A. Peters Open the ORCID record for Erin A. Peters [Opens in a new window]
Erin A. Peters*
Affiliation:
Appalachian State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Journal of Roman Archaeology , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , June 2024 , pp. 356 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bahrani, Z. 2001. Women of Babylon: Gender and Representation in Mesopotamia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barrett, C. E. 2009. “Diversity within Domestic Cult: A Contextualizing Analysis of Egyptianizing Terracotta Figurines from Delos.” PhD diss., Yale Univ.Google Scholar
Barrett, C. E. 2017. “Recontextualizing Nilotic scenes: Interactive landscapes in the garden of the Casa dell'Efebo, Pompeii.” AJA 121: 293–332.10.3764/aja.121.2.0293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, C. E. 2019. Domesticating Empire: Egyptian Landscapes in Pompeian Gardens. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190641351.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beinlich, H. 2008. Handbuch der Szenentitel in den Tempeln der griechisch-römischen Zeit Ägyptens, 2 vols. Dettelbach: Röll.Google Scholar
Betts, E., ed. 2017. Senses of the Empire: Multisensory Approaches to Roman Culture. Milton Park: Routledge.10.4324/9781315608358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budin, S. L., and Turfa, J. M., eds. 2016. Women in Antiquity: Real Women across the Ancient World. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315621425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassibry, K. 2021. Destinations in Mind: Portraying Places on the Roman Empire's Souvenirs. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190921897.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J. R. 2007. “Three uses of the pygmy and the Aethiops at Pompeii: Decorating, ‘othering,’ and warding off demons.” In Nile into Tiber: Egypt in the Roman World: Proceedings of the Third International Conference of Isis Studies, Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, May 11-14, 2005, ed. Bricault, L., Versluys, M. J., and Meyboom, P. G. P., 155–69. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Connelly, J. B. 2007. Portrait of a Priestess: Women and Ritual in Ancient Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400832699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, W. 2017. Visuality and Virtuality: Images and Pictures from Prehistory to Perspective. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Eccleston, S.-M., and Peralta, D. Padilla. 2022. “Racing the classics: Ethos and praxis.” AJP 143, no. 2: 199–218.10.1353/ajp.2022.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E., Foley, H. P., Kampen, N., Pomeroy, S. B., and Shapiro, H. A.. 1994. Women in the Classical World: Image and Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedland, E. A. 2020. “‘Classical’ versus ‘ancient’ in the Near Eastern canon: The position of Graeco-Roman art from the Levant, c. 330 BCE–636 CE.” In Testing the Canon of Ancient Near Eastern Art and Archaeology, ed. Gansell, A. R. and Shafer, A., 131–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190673161.003.0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates-Foster, J. 2016. “Objective alterity: Import consumption in the ports of Roman Egypt.” In Beyond Boundaries: Connecting Visual Cultures in the Provinces of Ancient Rome, ed. Alcock, S. E., Egri, M., and Frakes, J., 222–31. Los Angeles: Getty Publications.Google Scholar
Goebs, K. 2008. Crowns in Egyptian Funerary Literature. Oxford: Griffith Institute.Google Scholar
Graham, E.-J. 2018. “‘There buds the laurel’: Nature, temporality, and the making of place in the cemeteries of Roman Italy.” TRAJ 1: art. 3, 1–16.Google Scholar
Hallett, C. 2015. “Defining Roman art.” In A Companion to Roman Art, ed. Borg, B. E., 11–33. Hoboken: Wiley/Blackwell.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, J. 1997. Piscinae: Artificial Fishponds in Roman Italy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hingley, R. 2005. Globalizing Roman Culture: Unity, Diversity, and Empire. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203023341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampen, N. 2015. “Roman art and gender studies.” In A Companion to Roman Art, ed. Borg, B. E., 71–91. Hoboken: Wiley/Blackwell.10.1002/9781118886205.ch4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaper, O. E. 2023. “The Bark Stand of Isis, Berenike.” Paper presented at the XIIIth International Congress of Egyptologists: The Future of Ancient Egypt. Leiden, the Netherlands, 11 August 2023.Google Scholar
Langer, C., and Matić, U.. 2023. “Postcolonial theory in Egyptology: Key concepts and agendas.” Archaeologies 19: 1–27.10.1007/s11759-023-09470-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlowe, E. 2013. Shaky Ground: Context, Connoisseurship and the History of Roman Art. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Matić, U. 2016. “Gender in ancient Egypt: Norms, ambiguities, and sensualities.” NEA 79: 174–83.Google Scholar
Mazurek, L. A. 2021. “Gender and alterity in provincial portraiture: Reconsidering the Isiac grave reliefs of Roman Athens.” Hesperia 90, no. 3: 605–40.10.2972/hesperia.90.3.0605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyboom, P. G. P., and Versluys, M. J.. 2007. “The meaning of dwarfs in Nilotic scenes.” In Nile into Tiber: Egypt in the Roman World: Proceedings of the Third International Conference of Isis Studies, Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, May 11-14, 2005, ed. Bricault, L., Versluys, M. J., and Meyboom, P. G. P., 170–208. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Onstine, S. 2010. “Gender and the religion of ancient Egypt.” Religion Compass 4: 1–11.10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00178.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E. A. 2019. “Octavian transformed as pharaoh and as emperor Augustus.” In The Ancient Art of Transformation: Case Studies from Mediterranean Contexts, ed. Gondek, R. and Sulosky Weaver, C., 107–34. Oxford: Oxbow Books.10.2307/j.ctv13nb7mr.12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, I. 2017. “Pilgrimage and communication.” In Mercury's Wings: Exploring Modes of Communication in the Ancient World, ed. Naiden, F. S. and Talbert, R. J. A., 195–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swetnam-Burland, M. 2002. “Egypt in the Roman Imagination: A Study of Aegyptiaca from Pompeii.” PhD diss., Univ. of Michigan.Google Scholar
Swetnam-Burland, M. 2007. “Egyptian objects, Roman contexts: A taste for aegyptiaca in Italy.” In Nile into Tiber: Egypt in the Roman World: Proceedings of the Third International Conference of Isis Studies, Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, May 11-14, 2005, ed. Bricault, L., Versluys, M. J., and Meyboom, P. G. P., 113–36. Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Swetnam-Burland, M. 2020. “Aegyptiaca Romana: The ‘Black Room’ from the Villa of Boscotrecase and the aesthetics of empire.” In Beyond Egyptomania: Objects, Style and Agency, ed. Versluys, M. J., 97–113. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110565843-009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trentin, S. 2019. “Reality, artifice, and changing landscapes in the House of Marcus Lucretius in Pompeii.” GaR 66, no. 1: 71–92.10.1017/S0017383518000323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trimble, J. 2017. “Communicating with images in the Roman Empire.” In Mercury's Wings: Exploring Modes of Communication in the Ancient World, ed. Naiden, F. S. and Talbert, R. J. A., 106–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tybout, R. 2003. “Dwarfs in discourse: The functions of Nilotic scenes and other Roman aegyptiaca,” review of Aegyptiaca Romana, by M. J. Versluys. JRA 16: 505–15.Google Scholar
Van Oyen, A., and Pitts, M.. 2017. “What did objects do in the Roman world? Beyond representation.” In Materialising Roman Histories, ed. Van Oyen, A. and Pitts, M., 3–19. Oxford: Oxbow.10.2307/j.ctt1v2xtgh.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassilika, E. 1989. Ptolemaic Philae. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Versluys, M. J. 2002. Aegyptiaca Romana: Nilotic Scenes and the Roman Views of Egypt. Religions in the Graeco-Roman World 144. Leiden and Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004295957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versluys, M. J. 2015. “Roman visual material culture as globalising koine.” In Globalisation and the Roman World: World History, Connectivity and Material Culture, ed. Pitts, M. and Versluys, M. J., 141–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar