Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:52:33.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Social Status and Self-Esteem on Imitation and Choice of a Popular Peer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2015

Tessa A.M. Lansu ,
Antonius H.N. Cillessen  and
Johan C. Karremans
Tessa A.M. Lansu*
Affiliation:
Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Antonius H.N. Cillessen
Affiliation:
Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Johan C. Karremans
Affiliation:
Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
*
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Tessa A.M. Lansu, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This study addressed the role of influencer and influencee peer status in social influence of status-unrelated behaviours among emerging adults, while disentangling two forms of peer status, being liked (preference) and being powerful (popularity). Peer influence was examined in 67 women (M age = 20.5 years, SD = 2.1 years) using an experimental design. Popularity of the influencers and influencees (participants), as well as influencees’ preference and self-esteem were considered. Peer influence was measured through imitation of status-unrelated behaviours and task partner choice. In both tasks, influencees moved away from, rather than towards, a popular peer. Popular young women with low self-esteem were most likely to imitate a popular peer. Unpreferred young women with high self-esteem were least likely to imitate a popular peer. The findings demonstrate that the role of peer status in social influence processes is not limited to adolescence, and that the peer status of influencers and the influencees continues to affect social influence on status-unrelated behaviour in emerging adulthood.

Keywords

popularitypeer influenceimitationself-esteemsocial status
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Relationships Research , Volume 6 , 2015 , e14
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, P.A., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. Brunswick. NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Anderson, C., Keltner, D., & John, O.P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1054–1068. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1054 Google Scholar
Asendorpf, J.B., Banse, R., & Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380–393. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.380 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand Mc-Nally.Google Scholar
Bellmore, A. (2011). Peer rejection and unpopularity: Associations with GPAs across the transition to middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 282–295. doi:10.1037/a0023312 Google Scholar
Bot, S.M., Engels, R.C.M.E., Knibbe, R.A., & Meeus, W.H.J. (2005). Friend's drinking behaviour and adolescent alcohol consumption: The moderating role of friendship characteristics. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 929–947. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.09.012 Google Scholar
Chartrand, T.L., & Bargh, J.A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 Google Scholar
Cheng, C.M., & Chartrand, T.L. (2003). Self-monitoring without awareness: Using mimicry as a nonconscious affiliation strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1170–1179. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1170 Google Scholar
Choukas-Bradley, S., Giletta, M., Widman, L., Cohen, G.L., & Prinstein, M.J. (2014). Experimentally measured susceptibility to peer influence and adolescent sexual behavior trajectories: A preliminary study. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2221–2227. doi:10.1037/a0037300 Google Scholar
Cialdini, R.B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R.B., & Trost, M.R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In Gilbert, D.T., Fiske, S.T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., vol. 2, pp. 151–192). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Cillessen, A.H.N., & Borch, C. (2006). Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: A growth curve modelling analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 935–959. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.05.005 Google Scholar
Cillessen, A.H.N., & Marks, P.E.L. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring popularity. In Cillessen, A.H.N., Schwartz, D., & Mayeux, L. (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 25–56). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cillessen, A.H.N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x Google Scholar
Cillessen, A.H.N., & Rose, A.J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102–105. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x Google Scholar
Cohen, G.L., & Prinstein, M.J. (2006). Peer contagion of aggression and health risk behavior among adolescent males: An experimental investigation of effects on public conduct and private attitudes. Child Development, 77, 967–983. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00913.x Google Scholar
de Bruyn, E.H., Cillessen, A.H.N., & Wissink, I.B. (2010). Associations of peer acceptance and perceived popularity with bullying and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 543–566. doi:10.1177/0272431609340517 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dovidio, J.F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S.L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62–68. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.62 Google Scholar
Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F.X., Reis-Bergan, M., Trudeau, L., Vande Lune, L.S., & Buunk, B. (2002). Inhibitory effects of drinker and nondrinker prototypes on adolescent alcohol consumption. Health Psychology, 21, 601–609. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.21.6.601 Google Scholar
Gibbons, F.X., & Gerrard, M. (1997). Predicting young adolescents’ health risk behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 505–517. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.505 Google Scholar
Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartup, W.W. (2005). Peer interaction: What causes what? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 387–394. doi:10.1007/s10802-005-3578-0 Google Scholar
LaFontana, K.M., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (1998). The nature of children's stereotypes of popularity. Social Development, 7, 301–320. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00069 Google Scholar
LaFontana, K.M., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19, 130–147. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00522.x Google Scholar
Lakin, J.L., & Chartrand, T.L. (2005). Exclusion and nonconscious behavioral mimicry. In Williams, K.D., Forgas, J.P., & von Hippel, W. (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 279–296). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Lakin, J.L., Chartrand, T.L., & Arkin, R.M. (2008). I am too just like you: Nonconscious mimicry as an automatic behavioral response to social exclusion. Psychological Science, 19, 816–822. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02162.x Google Scholar
Lansu, T.A.M., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2012). Peer status in emerging adulthood: Associations of popularity and preference with social roles and behavior. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27, 132–150. doi:10.1177/0743558411402341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lease, A.M., Kennedy, C.A., & Axelrod, J.L. (2002). Children's social constructions of popularity. Social Development, 11, 87–109. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00188 Google Scholar
Lease, A.M., Musgrove, K.T., & Axelrod, J.L. (2002). Dimensions of social status in preadolescent peer groups: Likeability, popularity and social dominance. Social Development, 11, 508–533. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00213 Google Scholar
Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M.J., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18, 49–74. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2008.00550.x Google Scholar
McAdams, D.P. (1985). Power and intimacy. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
McClelland, D.C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40, 812–825. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.40.7.812 Google Scholar
Merten, D.E. (1997). The meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition, and conflict among junior high school girls. Sociology of Education, 70, 175–191. doi:10.2307/2673207 Google Scholar
Parkhurst, J.T., & Hopmeyer, A.G. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125–144. doi:10.1177/0272431698018002001 Google Scholar
Prinstein, M.J. (2007). Moderators of peer contagion: A longitudinal examination of depression socialization between adolescents and their best friend. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 159–170. doi:10.1080/15374410701274934 Google Scholar
Prinstein, M.J., Boergers, J., & Spirito, A. (2001). Adolescents’ and their friends’ health-risk behavior: Factors that alter or add to peer influence. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 26, 287–298. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/26.5.287 Google Scholar
Prinstein, M.J., Meade, C.S., & Cohen, G.L. (2003). Adolescent oral sex, peer popularity, and perceptions of best friends’ sexual behavior. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 28, 243–249. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsg012 Google Scholar
Rancourt, D., Choukas-Bradley, S., Cohen, G.L., & Prinstein, M.J. (2014). An experimental examination of peers’ influence on adolescent girls’ intent to engage in maladaptive weight-related behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 47, 437–447. doi:10.1002/eat.22258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinck, M., & Becker, E.S. (2007). Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38, 105–120. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.001 Google Scholar
Rose, A.J., Swenson, L.P., & Waller, E.M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40, 378–387. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.3.378 Google Scholar
Sandstrom, M.J. (2011). The power of popularity: Influence processes in childhood and adolescence. In Cillessen, A.H.N., Schwartz, D., & Mayeux, L. (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 219–244). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W.G. & Worchel, S. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp: 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole Google Scholar
Terry, R. (2000). Recent advances in measurement theory and the use of sociometric techniques. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 88, 27–53. doi:10.1002/cd.23220008805 Google Scholar
Teunissen, H.A., Spijkerman, R., Prinstein, M.J., Cohen, G.L., Engels, R.C., & Scholte, R.H. (2012). Adolescents’ conformity to their peers’ pro-alcohol and anti-alcohol norms: The power of popularity. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36, 1257–1267. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01728.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed