Hostname: page-component-669899f699-g7b4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T00:59:35.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Dyadic Perspective on Sexual Subjectivity and Romantic Relationship Functioning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2019

Brittany Kohlberger ,
Valerie A. Simon Open the ORCID record for Valerie A. Simon [Opens in a new window]  and
Zenaida Rivera
Brittany Kohlberger
Affiliation:
Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
Valerie A. Simon*
Affiliation:
Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
Zenaida Rivera
Affiliation:
Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Valerie Simon, Wayne State University, 71 East Ferry St., Detroit, MI 48202, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Sexual subjectivity is a central feature of healthy sexuality that is believed to shape and be shaped by relationship experiences. However, no studies have examined sexual subjectivity within a dyadic context. The current study examined partner similarity in sexual subjectivity within 75 heterosexual couples and associations with sexual relationship functioning using actor-partner interdependence models. Within couples, partners’ scores were significantly correlated on three of five elements of sexual subjectivity and showed similar mean levels on four of the five elements. Men's and women's sexual self-efficacy were positively associated with their own sexual communication. Other associations varied by gender. Men's sexual body esteem and entitlement to self-pleasure predicted their reports of sexual relationship functioning, and women's entitlement to pleasure from partners and sexual reflection predicted their reports of relationship functioning. Few partner effects were observed. Findings suggest that partners’ sexual subjectivity is relevant for dyadic functioning in emerging adulthood. Longitudinal research is needed to examine how experiences within and across relationships contribute to the development of sexual self-concepts and sexual functioning.

Keywords

sexual subjectivityromantic relationshipssexual communicationsexual satisfactionemerging adulthood
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Relationships Research , Volume 10 , 2019 , e22
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Antičević, V., Jokić, B.N., & Britvić, D. (2017). Sexual self-concept, sexual satisfaction, and attachment among single and coupled individuals. Personal Relationships, 24, 858–868.Google Scholar
Arnett, J.J. (2006). Emerging adulthood: Understanding the new way of coming of age. In Arnett, J. & Tanner, J.L. (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (p. 3). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Aron, A. (2003). Self and close relationships. In Leary, M.R. & Tangney, J.P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 442–461). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Berg, R.C., Munthe-Kaas, H.M., & Ross, M.W. (2016). Internalized homonegativity: A msystematic mapping review of empirical research. Journal of Homosexuality, 63, 541–558.Google Scholar
Bleske-Rechek, A., Remiker, M.W., & Baker, J.P. (2009). Similar from the start: Assortment in young adult dating couples and its link to relationship stability over time. Individual Differences Research, 7, 142–158.Google Scholar
Buzwell, S. & Rosenthal, D. (1996). Constructing a sexual self: Adolescents’ sexual self-perceptions and sexual risk-taking. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 489–513.Google Scholar
Collibee, C., & Furman, W. (2015). Quality counts: Developmental shifts in associations between romantic relationship qualities and psychosocial adjustment. Child Development, 86, 1639–1652.Google Scholar
Collins, W.A., Welsh, D.P., & Furman, W. (2009). Adolescent romantic relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 631–652.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. & Goldberg, A. (1999). Romantic relationships in adolescence: The role of friends and peers in their emergence and development. In Furman, W., Brown, B.B., & Feiring, C. (Eds.), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 266–290). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research, The Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26.Google Scholar
Cyranowski, J.M., & Andersen, B.L. (1998). Schemas, sexuality, and romantic attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1364–1379.Google Scholar
DeLamater, J. (1987). Gender differences in sexual scenarios. In Kelley, K. (Ed.), Females, males, and sexuality: Theories and research. (pp. 127–139). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Feiring, C., Markus, J., & Simon, V.A. (2018). Romantic conflict narratives in emerging adult couples: Viewpoint and gender matter. Family Process. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/famp.12418.Google Scholar
Furman, W.F., & Simon, V.A. (2008). Homophily in adolescent romantic relationships. In Prinstein, M.J. & Dodge, K. (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 203–224). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Furman, W., Wehner, E.A., & Shaffer, L. (2005). Sexual attitudes and behavior survey-revised (Unpublished measure). University of Denver, CO.Google Scholar
Furman, W., & Winkles, J.K. (2011). Transformations in Heterosexual Romantic Relationships Across the Transition into Adulthood: “Meet Me at the Bleachers... I mean the Bar”. In Laursen, B. & Collins, W.A. (Eds.), Relationship pathways: From Adolescence to Young Adulthood (pp. 209–213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gerressu, M., Mercer, C.H., Graham, C.A., Wellings, K., & Johnson, A.M. (2008). Prevalence of masturbation and associated factors in a British national probability survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 266–278.Google Scholar
Grello, C.M. & Harper, M.S. (2001). Couples’ Communication Scale (Unpublished questionnaire). University of Tennessee, TN.Google Scholar
Grello, C., Welsh, D., & Harper, M. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267.Google Scholar
Harden, K.P. (2014). A sex-positive framework for research on adolescent sexuality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 455–469.Google Scholar
Harter, S. (2012). The construction of the self: Developmental and sociocultural foundations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hewitt-Stubbs, G., Zimmer-Gembeck, M., Mastro, S., & Boislard, M. (2016). A longitudinal study of sexual entitlement and self-efficacy among young women and men: Gender differences and associations with age and sexual experience. Behavioral Sciences, 6, 4–18.Google Scholar
Horne, S., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J. (2005). Female sexual subjectivity and well-being: Comparing late adolescents with different sexual experiences. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 2, 25–40.Google Scholar
Horne, S., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J. (2006). The female sexual subjectivity inventory: Development and validation of a multidimensional inventory for late adolescent and emerging adults. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 125–138.Google Scholar
Hudson, W.W., Harrison, D.F., & Crosscup, P.C. (1981). A short-form scale to measure sexualdiscord in dyadic relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 17, 157–174.Google Scholar
Impett, E.A., & Peplau, L.A. (2003). Sexual compliance: Gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 87–100.Google Scholar
Impett, E.A., & Tolman, D.L. (2006). Late adolescent girls’ sexual experiences and sexual satisfaction. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 628–646.Google Scholar
Kaestle, C.E., & Halpern, C.T. (2007). What's love got to do with it? Sexual behaviors of opposite-sex couples through emerging adulthood. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39, 134–140.Google Scholar
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, E., & Gillen, M. (2006). ‘Sex is just a normal part of life’: Sexuality in emerging adulthood. In Arnett, J. & Tanner, J.L. (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 235–256). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Leveque, H.R., & Pedersen, C.L. (2012). Emerging adulthood: An age of sexual experimentation or sexual self-focus? Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 21, 147–159.Google Scholar
Lindberg, L.D., Jones, R., & Santelli, J.S. (2008). Noncoital sexual activities among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43, 231–238.Google Scholar
Martin, K.A. (1996). Puberty, sexuality, and the self: Girls and boys at adolescence. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mastro, S., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J. (2015). Let's talk openly about sex: Sexual communication, self-esteem and efficacy as correlates of sexual well-being. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 579–598.Google Scholar
Ménard, A.D., & Offman, A. (2009). The interrelationships between sexual self-esteem, sexual assertiveness and sexual satisfaction. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 18, 35–45.Google Scholar
Meston, C.M. & Buss, D.M. (2007). Why humans have sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 477–507.Google Scholar
Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998–2011). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
Oattes, M.K., & Offman, A. (2007). Global self-esteem and sexual self-esteem as predictors of sexual communication in intimate relationships. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 16, 89–100.Google Scholar
Orth, U., Erol, R.Y., Ledermann, T., & Grob, A. (2018). Co-development of well-being and self-esteem in romantic partners: Disentangling the effects of mutual influence and shared environment. Developmental Psychology, 54, 151–166.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, L.F., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2005). The timing of changes in girls’ sexual cognitions and behaviors in early adolescence: A prospective, cohort study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37, 211–219.Google Scholar
Pasupathi, M., Mansour, E., & Brubaker, J.R. (2007). Developing a life story: Constructing relations between self and experience in autobiographical narratives. Human Development, 50, 85–110.Google Scholar
Petersen, J.L., & Hyde, J.S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38.Google Scholar
Richters, J., Grulich, A.E., de Visser, R.O., Smith, A.M., & Rissel, C.E. (2003) Sex in Australia: Contraceptive practices among a representative sample of women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 27, 210–216.Google Scholar
Rivera, Z., Simon, V.A., Partridge, R. & Smith, E. (2019). Sexual subjectivity among gay, lesbian, and bisexual emerging adults. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Schick, V.R., Calabrese, S.K., Rima, B.N., & Zucker, A.N. (2010). Genital appearance dissatisfaction: Implications for women's genital image self-consciousness, sexual esteem, sexual satisfaction, and sexual risk. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 394–404.Google Scholar
Schroder, K.E.E., Carey, M.P., & Vanable, P.A. (2003). Methodological challenges in research on sexual risk behavior: II Accuracy of self-reports. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 26, 104–123.Google Scholar
Seiffge-Krenke, I. (2003). Testing theories of romantic development from adolescence to young adulthood: Evidence of a developmental sequence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 519–531.Google Scholar
Simon, V.A., Aikins, J.W., & Prinstein, M.J. (2008). Romantic partner selection and socialization during early adolescence. Child Development, 79, 1676–1692.Google Scholar
Slotter, E.B., & Gardner, W.L. (2009). Where do ‘you’ end and ‘I’ begin? Pre-emptive self–other inclusion as a motivated process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1137–1151.Google Scholar
Tice, D.M., & Wallace, H.M. (2003). The reflected self: Creating yourself as (you think) others see you. In Leary, M. & Tangney, J.P. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 91–105). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Tolman, D.L. (1994). Doing desire: Adolescent girls’ struggles for/with sexuality. Gender & Society, 8, 324–342.Google Scholar
Tolman, D.L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tolman, D.L. (2012). Female adolescents, sexual empowerment and desire: A missing discourse of gender inequity. Sex Roles, 66, 746–757.Google Scholar
Tolman, D.L., & McClelland, D.I. (2011). Normative sexuality development in adolescence: A decade in review, 2000–2009. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 242–255.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019). College enrollment and work activity of recent high school and college graduates. Retrieved April 25, 2019, from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/hsgec.pdfGoogle Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. (2018). Living with an unmarried partner now common for young adults. Retrieved November 15, 2018, from https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2018/11/cohabitaiton-is-up-marriage-is-down-for-young-adults.htmlGoogle Scholar
Vickberg, S.M.J., & Deaux, K. (2005). Measuring the dimensions of women's sexuality: The Women's Sexual Self-Concept Scale. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 53, 361–369.Google Scholar
Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J. (2013). Young female's sexual-efficacy: Associations with personal autonomy and the couple relationship. Sexual Health, 10, 204–210.Google Scholar
Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J., Ducat, W.H., & Boislard-Pepin, M.A. (2011). A prospective study of young females’ sexual subjectivity: Associations with age, sexual behavior, and dating. Archives of Sex Behavior, 40, 927–938.Google Scholar
Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J., & French, J. (2016). Associations of sexual subjectivity with global and sexual well-being: A new measure for young males and comparison to females. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 315–27.Google Scholar
Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J., & Helfand, M. (2008). Ten years of longitudinal research on U.S. adolescent sexual behavior: Developmental correlates of sexual intercourse, and the importance of age, gender and ethnic background. Developmental Review, 28, 153–224.Google Scholar
Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J., & Skinner, E.A. (2011). Review: The development of coping across childhood and adolescence: An integrative review and critique of research. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 1–17.Google Scholar