Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T20:13:48.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Virtual simulation and treatment verification–merits and demerits: experience at Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation (SIUT), Pakistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

Mutahir Tunio ,
Mansoor Rafi ,
Aamir Maqbool  and
Asdarul Haque
Mutahir Tunio
Affiliation:
Sind Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
Mansoor Rafi
Affiliation:
Sind Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
Aamir Maqbool
Affiliation:
Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, Pakistan
Asdarul Haque
Affiliation:
Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission, Pakistan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: The rapid changes in practice of radiotherapy have taken place over the past 5 years in Pakistan. With advent of computed tomography simulator, and multileaf collimators–assisted linear accelerators and electronic portal imaging system, few centres in Pakistan have switched from conventional radiotherapy to modern computer-based technology. Our hospital is first centre in Pakistan which is using virtual simulation since March 2006. We present our experience with list of merits and demerits.

Design: Retrospective study.

Patient collection: Medical records of all patients who received radiotherapy in our centre were reviewed. Parameters included were type of malignancy, type radiotherapy (curative/palliative), simulation and planning process time and the displacement of the beam-axis from the planning isocentre in clinical situations during three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging device (EPID). Data were collected on written proforma. Percentages, frequencies, measures of central tendency and dispersion were calculated using SPSS version 17.0.

Results: A total of 289 patients were treated from March 2006 to November 2008. Transitional cell carcinoma of urinary bladder was most common malignancy seen (42.4%) followed by prostate (28.62%) and renal cell carcinoma (14.14%). Of these 34.26% patients were treated on curative basis. The virtual simulation process could be completed in an average time of 5 min (SD 3.5). Under many cases, the treatment portals could be designed and the patient marked in one session. The displacements were recorded for 43 portals for early prostate cancer using an EPID system. The mean displacement was found 2.44 ± 0.8 mm in x (transverse), y (craniocaudal), and z (anteroposterior) directions during treatment. Standard deviation (SD) was 0.87 (90% CI 2.21–2.66). Average number of portals taken was 10 (6–27) per treatment session.

Conclusion: Computer-based simulation and treatment over conventional methods is appropriate for curative patients, achieving more accurate tumour localisation, sparing normal organs at risk, reduced field sizes and a film free environment; however efforts are required to achieve maximum immobilisation during treatment.

Keywords

Radiotherapy in Pakistanvirtual simulationmultileaf collimator linear acceleratorselectronic portal imaging devicesdigitally reconstructed radiographs
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 131 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sherouse, GW, Mosher, CE, Novins, KL, Rosenmann, JG, Chaney, EL. Virtual simulation: concept and implementation. In: Bruinvis, IAD, van der Giessen, PH, van Kleffens, HJ, Wittkamper, FW (eds). Ninth International Conference on the Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North Holland Publishing, 1987, pp. 433–436.Google Scholar
Javed, AA. Progress of oncology in Pakistan. IJMPO 2006; 27:54–59.Google Scholar
Rafique, M, Javed, AA. Clinico-pathological features of bladder carcinoma in women in Pakistan and smokeless tobacco as a possible risk factor. World J Surg Oncol 2005; 3: 53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurkmans, CW, Remiejer, P, Lebeque, JV, Mijnhier, BJ. Setup verification using portal imaging; review of current clinical practice. Radiother Oncol 2001; 58: 105–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senan, S, van Sornsen de Kose, J, de Boer, J et al. The use of CT simulation in digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) in set-up verification allows for smaller planning target volumes in lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2000; 20 (Suppl 1): 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchali, A, Geismar, D, Hinkelbein, M, Schlenger, L, Zinner, K, Budach, V. Virtual simulation in patients with breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2001; 59: 267–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raga, DP, Forman, JD, He, T, Mesina, CF. Clinical results of computerized tomography-based simulation with laser patient marking. Int J Rad Oncol Bio Phys 1996; 34: 691–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, KM. The use of spiral CT to access internal-motion target volume margins for thoracic and abdominal tumor. Seventh Annual Oncology Symposium, Boston, 2000.Google Scholar
Baker, GR. Localization: conventional and CT simulation. Br J Radiol 2006; 79 (Spec No 1): S36–S49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinkawa, M, Pursch-Lee, M, Asadpour, B, Gagel, B, Piroth, MD, Klotz, J et al. Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Implementation of ultrasound-based prostate localization for the analysis of inter- and intrafraction organ motion. Strahlenther Onkol 2008; 184 (12): 679–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spoerk, J, Bergmann, H, Wanschitz, F, Dong, S, Birkfellner, W. Fast DRR splat rendering using common consumer graphics hardware. Med Phys 2007;34 (11): 4302–4308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conway, J, Robinson, MH. CT virtual simulation. Br J Radiol 1997; 70 (Suppl): S106–S118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cho, P, Seo, B, Choi, T, Kim, J, Kim, Y, Choi, J et al. The development of a diagnostic reference level on patient dose for CT examination in Korea. Radiat Prot Dosim 2008; 129 (4): 463–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed