Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:33:25.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

To analyse target volume variations during SIB-IMRT of squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2020

Qurat-ul-Ain Shamsi Open the ORCID record for Qurat-ul-Ain Shamsi [Opens in a new window] ,
Khalid Iqbal ,
Shagufta Jabeen  and
Saeed Ahmad Buzdar
Qurat-ul-Ain Shamsi*
Affiliation:
Physics Department, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan
Khalid Iqbal
Affiliation:
Clinical and Radiation Oncology Department, Shaukat Khanum, Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
Shagufta Jabeen
Affiliation:
Biology Department, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan
Saeed Ahmad Buzdar
Affiliation:
Physics Department, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan
*
Author for correspondence: Qurat-ul-Ain Shamsi, Physics Department, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Punjab63100, Pakistan. Tel: +923216827959. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Purpose:

To assess volume variations in target site due to changes in bladder filling and rectal content including air bubbles during simultaneous-integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) of patients suffering from squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix.

Materials and methods:

A total of ten patients of squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix were enrolled in this analysis. All patients were planned to undergo SIB-IMRT using 10 MV beam. Planning target volume of the tumour (PTVtumour) and PTVnodal were prescribed with 5,040 and 4,500 cGy doses, respectively. During planning, PTVtumour V95%, PTVnodal V95% and organs at risk (OARs) (bladder, rectum, femoral heads and small bowel) volumes were measured from initial CT planning scans taken with full bladder. CT scans were acquired once in a week over a treatment period of 5·5 weeks. Intra-treatment scans with full bladder were then fused with the planning scans to determine variations in the target volume and the OAR volume. Changes in radiation dose to the PTVtumour and the PTVnodal were also assessed by comparing intra-treatment scans with the planning (first) scans.

Results:

All patients showed intra-treatment bladder volume larger than the planning bladder volume. Difference between planning bladder and intra-treatment bladder volumes ranged from 4·5 to 49%. Rectal volume varied from 17 to 60 cc. A wide variation between planning and intra-treatment air volumes was found in most of the patients. When comparing initial and inter-fraction air volumes, the maximum difference was 366·67%. Due to bladder and rectal volume variations, PTVtumour V95% and PTVnodal V95% doses did not remain constant throughout the treatment. The maximum discrepancy between intra-treatment PTVtumour dose and planning PTVtumour dose was 12·15%. The maximum difference between planning and inter-fraction PTV V95% was 48·28%. PTVnodal dose observed from scan taken in last week of treatment was 12·87% less than planning PTVnodal dose analysed from planning CT scan. Maximum difference in planning and inter-fraction PTVnodal V95% was 57·78%.

Conclusion:

Inconsistent bladder and rectal volumes had a significant impact on target volume and dosage during an entire course of SIB-IMRT. For radiotherapy of gynaecological malignancies, data on variations in PTV should be acquired on daily basis to target radiation dose to the tumour site with accuracy.

Keywords

air bubblesbladder filling and rectal contenttarget volume variationsuterine cervix cancervariation in target dose
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 2021 , pp. 183 - 188
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mazzola, R, Ricchetti, F, Fiorentino, A et al. Weekly cisplatin and volumetric-modulated arc therapy with simultaneous integrated boost for radical treatment of advanced cervical cancer in elderly patients: feasibility and clinical preliminary results. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2017; 16 (3): 310–315. doi: 10.1177/1533034616655055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazzola, R, Fersino, S, Fiorentino, A et al. The impact of prostate gland dimension in genitourinary toxicity after definitive prostate cancer treatment with moderate hypofractionation and volumetric modulated arc radiation therapy. Clin Transl Oncol 2016; 18 (3): 317–321.Google ScholarPubMed
Cozzi, L, Dinshaw, K A, Shrivastava, S K et al. A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2008; 89 (2): 180–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornqvist, S, Hysing, L B, Tuomikoski, L et al. Adaptive radiotherapy strategies for pelvic tumors – a systematic review of clinical implementations. Acta Oncol 2016; 55 (8): 943–958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchali, A, Koswig, S, Dinges, S et al. Impact of the filling status of the bladder and rectum on their integral dose distribution and the movement of the uterus in the treatment planning of gynaecological cancer. Radiother Oncol 1999; 52: 29–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, P, Dinniwell, R, Haider, M A et al. Inter- and intrafractional tumor and organ movement in patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy: a cinematic-MRI point-of-interest study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 70: 1507–1515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huh, S J, Park, W, Han, Y. Interfractional variation in position of the uterus during radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 2004; 71: 73–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, J E, Han, Y, Huh, S J et al. Interfractional variation of uterine position during radical RT: weekly CT evaluation. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 104: 145–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, A, Powell, M E B. An assessment of interfractional uterine and cervical motion: implications for radiotherapy target volume definition in gynaecological cancer. Radiother Oncol 2008; 88: 250–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmad, R, Hoogeman, M S, Bondar, M et al. Increasing treatment accuracy for cervical cancer patients using correlations between bladder filling change and cervix-uterus displacement: proof of principle. Radiother Oncol 2011; 98 (3): 340–346. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.11.010. Epub 2011 Feb 4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Georg, P, Georg, D, Hillbrand, M, Kirisits, C, Pötter, R. Factors influencing bowel sparing in intensity modulated whole pelvic radiotherapy for gynaecological malignancies. Radiother Oncol 2006; 80 (1): 19–26. Epub 2006 Jun 12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jhingran, A, Salehpour, M, Sam, M, Levy, L, Eifel, P J. Vaginal motion and bladder and rectal volumes during pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy after hysterectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82 (1): 256–262. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.024. Epub 2010 Nov 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S I, Atri, M. FIGO staging system for uterine cervical cancer: enter cross-sectional imaging. Radiology 2019; 292 (1): 15–24. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190088. Epub 2019 May 28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerkhof, E M, Raaymakers, B W, van der Heide, U A, van de Bunt, L, Jurgenliemk-Schulz, I M, Lagendijk, J J W. Online MRI guidance for healthy tissue sparing in patients with cervical cancer: an IMRT planning study. Radiother Oncol 2008; 88: 241–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eminowicz, G K D. Standardisation and optimisation of radical radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Doctoral thesis, University College of London, 2016.Google Scholar
Sithamparam, S, Ahmad, R, Sabarudin, A, Othman, Z, Ismail, M. Bladder filling variation during conformal radiotherapy rectal cancer. IOP Conf Series: J Phys: Conf Series 2017; 851: 012026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuyttens, J J, Robertson, J M, Yan, D, Martinez, A. The position and volume of the small bowel during adjuvant radiation therapy for rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 51: 1271–1280.Google ScholarPubMed
Yong, Y, Eduard, S, Tianfang, L, Chuang, W, Lei, X. Evaluation of on-board KV cone beam CT (CBCT)-based dose calculation. Phy Med Biol 2007; 52 (3):685–705 (621).Google Scholar
Thilmann, C, Nill, S, Tucking, T et al. Correction of patient positioning errors based on in-line cone beam CTs: clinical implementation and first experiences. Radiat Oncol 2005; 63 (6): 550551.Google Scholar
Grills, I S, Hugo, G, Kestin, L L, Chao, K K, Wloch, J, Yan, D. Image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) via online cone beam CT substantially reduces margin requirements for stereotactic lung radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol 2008; 70 (3): 1045–1056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamamoto, R, Yonesaka, A, Nishioka, S et al. High dose three-dimensional conformal boost (3DCB) using an orthogonal diagnostic X-ray set-up for patients with gynecological malignancy: a new application of real-time tumor-tracking system. Radiother Oncol 2004; 73: 219–222.Google ScholarPubMed
Chen, Z, Yang, Z, Wang, J, Hu, W. Dosimetric impact of different bladder and rectum filling during prostate cancer radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11: 103. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed