Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:42:42.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiation therapists and the Internet: a perspective from Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

Madeleine Shanahan
Madeleine Shanahan*
Affiliation:
School of Medical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Australia
*
Correspondence to: Madeleine Shanahan, School of Medical Sciences, RMIT University, Plenty Road, Bundoora West Campus, Bundoora, 3083, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Internet is an important information source for health practitioners; yet little is known of how radiation therapists (RTs) are currently using this vast information resource for their professional learning. In 2007, a four-page postal survey was sent to a random sample of 1,142 Medical Radiation Science practitioners with a response rate of 32.8%, which included 76 RTs. This paper reports and analyses the questionnaire responses from RTs on the use of the Internet to update their professional knowledge and issues affecting accessibility to the Internet in the workplace. This research provides an initial data set on the professional use of Internet-based tools and resources by Australian RTs. It has been shown that the Internet is an important information source widely used by RTs as they search the Internet (89%), access specific web pages (85%), use e-mail (84%) and listservs (49%) to update their professional knowledge. Although all RTs reported Internet access within their workplace, a number of factors have been identified which at present limit accessibility of current quality health and medical information through the Internet to RTs. A large number of RTs were unaware of Internet-based resources, such as Cochrane Library (48%) and GoogleScholar (42%), which support evidence-based practice (EBP) and research. RTs in teaching environments had greater access to computers with Internet access than their colleagues in non-teaching environments (p = 0.044). More RTs in the private sector (22%) reported they had ‘no’ access to the Internet in their workplace than their public sector colleagues (4%, p = 0.037). In addition, RTs in metropolitan workplaces had greater access to protected time during work hours for professional reading or study than their non-metropolitan colleagues (p = 0.000). These issues of non-uniformity of resources across workplaces and knowledge gaps within the profession must be addressed so that all RTs can avail themselves of high quality resources available through the Internet that support them in implementing EBP and meeting the mandatory requirement of updating their professional knowledge.

Keywords

AccessInternetLifelong learningProfessional learningRadiation Therapist
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 137 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, NL, Casebeer, LL, Kristofco, RE, Strasser, SM. Physicians’ internet information-seeking behaviors. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2004; 24: 31–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casebeer, L, Bennett, N, Kristofco, R, Carillo, A, Centor, R. Physician internet medical information seeking and on-line continuing education use patterns. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2002; 22: 33–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Estabrooks, CA, O'Leary, KA, Ricker, KL, Humphrey, CK. The internet and access to evidence: how are nurses positioned? J Adv Nurs 2003; 42(1): 73–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilmore, JA, Scott, SD, Huntington, N. Nurses and Internet health information. J Adv Nurs 2008; 61: 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C, Lambros, M. Use of the internet for patient care: a nationwide survey of Australian Anaesthetists. Anaesth Intensive Care 2003; 31(3): 290–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcoux, BC, Barlage, A, Davies, R, Heller, M. Professional use of the Internet by physical therapists in Michigan. J Phys Ther Educ 2004; 18(2): 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorbeck, F, Zimmermann, C, Vorbeck-Meister, I, Kainberger, F, Imhof, H. Internet use in radiology: results of a nationwide survey. Eur J Radiol 1999; 31(2): 141–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nail-Chiwetalu, BJ, Ratner, NB. Information literacy for speech-language pathologists: a key to evidence-based practice. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2006; 37(3): 157–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veness, M, Rikard-Bell, G, Ward, J. Views of Australian and New Zealand radiation oncologists and registrars about evidence-based medicine and their access to Internet based resources. Australas Radiol 2003; 47: 409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanahan, M, Herrington, A, Herrington, J. The Internet and the medical radiation science practitioner. Radiography 2008; doi:10.1016/j.radi.2008.05.002.Google Scholar
Masters, K. For what purpose and reasons do doctors use the Internet: a systematic review. Int J Med Inf 2008; 77(1): 4–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrington, A, Herrington, J. Effective Use of the Internet: Keeping Professionals Working in Rural Australia. Barton, ACT: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, 2006.Google Scholar
Willmot, M, Sullivan, F. NHSnet in Scottish primary care: lessons for the future. Br Med J 2001; 321: 878–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P, Droogan, J, Glanville, J, Watt, I, Hardman, G. Access to the evidence base from general practice: a survey of general practice staff in Northern and Yorkshire Region. Qual Health Care 2001; 10(2): 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, KA, Wong, I. Searching for health information on the internet: a pilot evaluation of pharmacists' skills. Pharmacist 2003; 22(9): 716–719.Google Scholar
King, E. An evaluation of internet websites provided by radiotherapy departments. J Radiother Pract 2007; 6(02): 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metz, JM, Devine, P, DeNittis, A, Jones, H, Hampshire, M, Goldwein, J et al. A multi-institutional study of Internet utilization by radiation oncology patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 56(4): 1201–1205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, RP, Devine, P, Jones, H, DeNittis, A, Whittington, R, Metz, JM. Internet use by patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Urology 2003; 62(2): 273–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, M. Social surveys: design to analysis. In: May, T (ed). Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process, 2nd edn.Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997, pp. 81–108.Google Scholar
Punch, KF. Qualitative research: overview, design and grounded theory. In: Punch, KF (ed). Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage Publications, 1998, pp. 138–173.Google Scholar
Gillham, B. Case Study Research Methods. London: Continuum, 2000.Google Scholar
Mertens, DM. Research Methods in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage Publications, 1998.Google Scholar
AIHW. Health and community services labour force 2001. Canberra: (AIHW) National Health Labour Force Series no. 27, 2003.Google Scholar
NLM Fact Sheet. What's the difference between MEDLINE and PubMed? 2006 [cited 17 October 2008]; Available from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/dif_med_pub.htmlGoogle Scholar
Cochrane Library. n.d. [cited 17 October 2008]; Available from: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/mrw-home/106568753/AboutCochrane.htmlGoogle Scholar
Google. About GoogleScholar. [cited 17 October 2008]; Available from: http://scholar.google.com.au/intl/en/scholar/about.htmlGoogle Scholar
Langmack, K, Routsis, D. Towards an evidence based treatment technique in prostate radiotherapy. J Radiother Pract 2006; 2(02): 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newnham, J. Towards an evidence-based 3D conformal radiotherapy prostate protocol: what is the role of spiral CT? J Radiother Pract 2006; 1(04): 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacitti, CA. Symptomatic treatment of radiation-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer: current practice, literature review and evidence-based recommendations. J Radiother Pract 2005; 4(01): 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ACORRN. Gap analysis of role definition and training needs for therapeutic research radiographers in the UK. Br J Radiol 2007; 80(957): 693–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolderston, A, Harnett, N, Palmer, C, Wenz, J, Catton, P. The scholarly radiation therapist. Part two: developing an academic practice? the Princess Margaret Hospital experience. J Radiother Pract 2008; 7(02): 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafslund, B, Clare, J, Graverholt, B, Wammen Nortvedt, M. Evidence-based radiography. Radiography 2008; 14(4): 343–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. Evidence based medical imaging (EBMI). Radiography 2008; 14(3): 233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauber, TL, Legg, JS. Research and scholarship among R.T. educators. Radiol Technol 2003; 74(5): 376–384.Google ScholarPubMed
Fauber, TL, Legg, JS. Perceived research needs and barriers among R.T. educators. Radiol Technol 2004; 76(1): 19–30.Google ScholarPubMed
Gambling, T, Brown, P, Hogg, P. Research in our practice—a requirement not an option: discussion paper. Radiography 2003; 9: 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickersgill, R. Evidence-based practice: an introduction through skills mix. Synergy 2007; Jan: 20–25.Google Scholar
Wong, K, Veness, MJ. Internet access, awareness and utilization of web-based evidence: a survey of Australian, New Zealand and Singaporean radiation oncology registrars. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2005; 1(4): 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, J, Reis, J. Exploring computer technology usage amongst remote area nurses in Australia: a preliminary analysis. In: Wise, M, Grain, H, Chu, S (eds). Thirteenth National Health Informatics Conference, 2005; Melbourne, Australia: Health Informatics Society of Australia, 2005.Google Scholar
Salbach, NM, Jaglal, SB, Korner-Bitensky, N, Rappolt, S, Davis, D. Practitioner and Organizational Barriers to Evidence-based Practice of Physical Therapists for People With Stroke. Phys Ther 2007; 87(10): 1284–1303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheek, J, Doskatsch, I. Information literacy: a resource for nurses as lifelong learners. Nurse Educ Today 1998; 18(3): 243–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, J. Searching for evidence. CINAHLnews 2004; 23(2): 2–8.Google Scholar
Snowball, R. Finding the evidence: an information skills approach. In: Dawes, M, Davies, P, Gray, A, Mant, J, Seers, K, Snowball, R (eds). Evidence-based Practice, 2nd edn. pp. 17–49. Edinburgh: Elsevier, 2005.Google Scholar
Shanahan, MC. Information literacy skills of undergraduate medical radiation students. Radiography 2007; 13(3): 187–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanahan, MC. Transforming information search and evaluation practices of undergraduate students. Int J Med Inf 2008; 77(8): 518–526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, M, Papadopoulos, I, Sigsworth, J. Barriers to evidence-based practice. Clin Eff Nurs 1998; 2(1): 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosling, AS, Westbrook, JI. Allied health professionals’ use of online evidence: a survey of 790 staff working in the Australian public hospital system. Int J Med Inf 2004; 73(4): 391–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hommelstad, J, Ruland, CM. Norwegian nurses' perceived barriers and facilitators to research use. AORN J 2004; 79(3): 621–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veness, MJ. Evidence based medicine and radiation oncology in Australia and New Zealand in 2000: a survey of consultants and registrars [MPH Treatise]: University of Sydney, 2001.Google Scholar
MRPBV. Medical Radiation Practitioner Guidelines for Continuing Professional Development. nd [cited 17 October 2008]; Available from: http://www.mrpb.vic.gov.au/cmsfiles/pub_policy_cpd.pdfGoogle Scholar
AIR. Education Policies, January 2004. [cited 17 October 2008]; Available from: http://www.air.asn.au/html/s01_home/home.aspGoogle Scholar
MRTBNZ Continuing Professional Development. 2007 [cited 17 October 2008]; Available from: http://www.mrtboard.org.nz/pdfs/CPD%20philosophy%20%20requi-rements%20May07%20review.pdfGoogle Scholar
SOR Learning and Development Framework for Clinical Imaging and Oncology. London: The College of Radiographers, 2007.Google Scholar