Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:29:26.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A qualitative analysis of radiation therapy students’ professional placement journals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2013

Naomi Findlay ,
Shane E. Dempsey  and
Helen M. Warren-Forward
Naomi Findlay
Affiliation:
Medical Radiation Science, Hunter Building University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
Shane E. Dempsey*
Affiliation:
Medical Radiation Science, Hunter Building University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
Helen M. Warren-Forward
Affiliation:
Medical Radiation Science, Hunter Building University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
*
Correspondence to: Shane E. Dempsey, Medical Radiation Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia. Tel: +61 (0) 2 49216667. Fax: +61 (0) 2 49217053. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Purpose

Student experience on clinical placement is not well captured with traditional program evaluation tools. This study aims to complete a qualitative analysis of the reflective clinical journals completed during professional placement by radiation therapy (RT) students in order to uncover the issues that affect students on placement and how these change as the student's progress through the program.

Materials and methods

A qualitative descriptive analysis (QDA) was undertaken on the descriptive content of student journals completed by 97 students over 3 consecutive years while undertaking professional placement in Radiation Oncology Treatment Centres within Australia. Two coders used a QDA sourcebook specifically designed for the research to independently analyse the descriptive content of the reflective journals for four main categories and 18 subcategories.

Results

The result revealed a statistically significant increased tendency to discuss clinical environment and a decreased tendency to discuss the patient, 92·9–12·5% (coder 1) and 85·7–18·8% (coder 2), as they progressed through the program.

Conclusions

The results of this study showed some similarities with studies completed in other health professions; however, the breadth of issues explored within the content of these RT student journals demonstrates the true diversity of the RT student experience on professional placement.

Keywords

qualitative analysisradiation therapystudent journals
Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 131 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Patton, J, Woods, SJ, Agarenzo, T, Brubaker, C, Metcalf, T, Sherrer, L. Enhancing the clinical practicum experience through journal writing. J Nurs Educ 1997; 36 (5): 238–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Boyd, L. Reflections on clinical practice by first-year dental students: a qualitative study. J Dent Educ 2002; 66 (6): 710–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Williams, R, Wilkins, S. The use of reflective summary as a method of obtaining student feedback about entering physical therapy practice. J Phys Ther Educ 1999; 13 (1): 28–33.Google Scholar
4.Williams, R, Wessel, J. Reflective journal writing to obtain student feedback about their learning during the study of chronic musculoskeletal conditions. J Allied Health 2004; 33 (1): 17–23.Google Scholar
5.Landeen, J, Byrne, C, Brown, B. Exploring the lived experiences of psychiatric nursing students through self-reflective journals. J Adv Nurs 1995; 21 (5): 878–885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Pitkala, K, Mantyranta, T. Feelings related to first patient experience in medical school: a qualitative study on students’ personal portfolios. Patient Educ Couns 2004; 54: 171–177.Google Scholar
7.Williams, RE, Wessel, J, Gemus, M, Foster-Seargeant, E. Journal writing to promote reflection by physical therapy students during clinical placements. Physiother Theory Pract 2002; 18: 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. University of Newcastle MRS RT, Clinical Education Workbook. 2004, Newcastle: University of Newcastle.Google Scholar
9.Findlay, N, Dempsey, S, Warren-Forward, H. Development of a framework for Qualitative Analysis of Reflective Journals. The Radiographer 2010; 57 (2): 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Thomsen, N, Olsen, L, Nielsen, S. Kappa statistics in the assessment of observer variation: the significance of multiple observers classifying ankle fracturea. J Orthop Sci 2002; 7: 163–166.Google Scholar
11.Feinstein, A, Cicchetti, D. High agreement but low kappa: the problem of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol 1990; 43 (6): 543–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Thompson, W, Walter, S. Kappa and the concept of independent errors. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41 (10): 969–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed