Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T02:04:52.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring attitudes and opinions of radiation therapists in British Columbia towards advanced practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2013

Cher Kinamore
Cher Kinamore*
Affiliation:
British Columbia Cancer Agency, Fraser Valley Centre, Surrey, BC, Canada
*
Correspondence to: Cher Kinamore, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Fraser Valley Cancer Centre, 13750 96th Avenue, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada V3V 1Z2. Tel: 011 1 604 930 4055. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Although the notion of advanced practice (AP) has been widely accepted and implemented in some countries, for example, the United Kingdom, in Canada it is has yet to be widely tested as a model of working. Currently it has been implemented and evaluated in Ontario, but this approach is not widespread across the country. To date in British Columbia (BC), there are no advanced practitioners and no research has been conducted regarding the opinions and attitudes of radiation therapists (RTs) in BC towards the implementation of AP. Understanding RTs attitudes and perceptions towards AP may be important when considering the acceptance and implementation of new roles. The research objectives were to explore the attitudes and opinions of RTs and establish what the term AP means to BC RTs, and also to discover what they consider to be benefits, and barriers to implementing AP.

Materials and methods

A quantitative approach was utilised and an on-line questionnaire was sent to 266 RTs that currently practice in BC. Likert and demographic questions were used to explore the definition of AP and ascertain opinions about the barriers and benefits of implementing AP in BC.

Results

A total of 183 questionnaires were completed for a response rate of 69%. The majority of respondents agreed with the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologies (CAMRT) and the literature's definition of AP. Cost, time, lack of support and training and issues of medical dominance were cited as barriers. Job satisfaction, autonomy, and increased recruitment and retention of staff were considered benefits.

Conclusions

Although RTs believe there are obstacles to be overcome regarding the adoption and implementation of AP, these are outweighed by the potential benefits such as enhanced patient care due to increased levels of professional knowledge and development that can lead to increased levels of job satisfaction. These are seen as important drivers for creating the AP role in BC.

Keywords

advanced practiceradiation therapy
Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 264 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Hameric, A, Spyros, J, Hanson, C. Advanced Practice Nursing – An Integrative Approach, 3rd edition. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Ltd., 2005.Google Scholar
2.Eddy, A. Supporting advanced practice for therapy radiographers through work-based learning. Synergy 2005; Nov: 13–17.Google Scholar
3.Harnett, N. Developing advanced practice: face the issues, find the solutions. Can J Med Radiat Technol 2007; 38: 56–60.Google Scholar
4.Department of Health. Radiography Skills Mix – A report on the 4 tier delivery service model 2003. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4007123. Accessed on 18th January 2009.Google Scholar
5. Radiation Therapy Advanced Practice in Ontario 2007. http://www.ontarioradiationtherapy.ca. Accessed on 18th January 2009.Google Scholar
6.Eddy, A. Exploring advanced practice in Australia and Canada. Synergy 2006; Aug: 28–31.Google Scholar
7.Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. About the profession. Advanced Practice. http://www.camrt.ca/english/profession/advanced_practice.asp#rtherapist. Accessed on 15th February 2009.Google Scholar
8.Probst, H, Griffiths, S. Retaining therapy radiographers: what's so special about us? J Radiother Pract 2007; 6: 21–32.Google Scholar
9.Cozby, P. Methods in Behavioural Research. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Higher Education, 2001: 92–135.Google Scholar
10.Bond, T, Fox, C. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, 2nd edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007: 101.Google Scholar
11.Bolderston, A, Smoke, M, Harnett, N, Lewis, D, Wenz, J. Canadian managers’ perspectives on advanced practice. Radiat Ther 2005; 14: 156–162.Google Scholar
12.Griffin, M, Melby, V. Developing an advanced nurse practitioner service in emergency care: attitudes of nurses and doctors. J Adv Nurs 2006; 56: 292–301.Google Scholar
13.Carper, E, Haas, M. Advanced practice nursing in radiation oncology. Semin Oncol Nurs 2006; 22: 203–211.Google Scholar
14.Lynch, M, Cope, D, Murphy-Ende, K. Advanced practice issues: results of the ONS advanced practice nursing survey. Oncol Nurs Forum 2001; 28: 1521–1530.Google Scholar
15.Eddy, A. Advanced practice for therapy radiographers – a discussion paper. Radiography 2006; 14: 24–31.Google Scholar
16.White, P, Lee, S, Wong, C, Lee, A, Cheung, D. Role development for therapeutic radiographers in the public hospitals in Hong Kong. J Radiother Pract 2004; 4: 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Snaith, B, Hardy, M. How to achieve advanced practitioner status: a discussion paper. Radiography 2007; 13: 142–146.Google Scholar
18.Martino, S, Odle, T. Advanced practice in radiation therapy. Radiat Ther 2007; 16: 155–161.Google Scholar
19.Hardy, M, Snaith, B. Role extension and role advancement – is there a difference? A discussion paper. Radiography 2006; 12: 327–331.Google Scholar
20.Hogg, P. Advanced clinical practice for radiographers in Great Britain: professional roles, accountability and the educational provision. Can J Med Radiat Technol 2004; 35: 6–12.Google Scholar
21.Bolderston, A. Advanced practice issues for radiation therapists in the province of Ontario: a case study. Can J Med Radiat Technol 2005; 36: 5–14.Google Scholar
22.Palarm, T, Jones, K, Gilchrist, M. Personal and professional development: a survey of radiographers employed in the South West Region. Radiography 2001; 7: 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Henwood, M, Huggett, S. Radiographic CPD requirements-a regional study. Radiography 1999; 5: 3–10.Google Scholar
24.Pickett, M, Waterstram-Rich, K, Turner, L. The future of nuclear medicine technology: are we ready for Advanced Practice. J Nucl Med Technol 2000; 28: 280–286.Google Scholar
25.Collins, K, Jones, M, McDonnell, A, Read, S, Jones, R, Cameron, A. Do new roles contribute to job satisfaction and retention of staff in nursing and professions allied to medicine? J Nurs Manag 2000; 8: 3–12.Google Scholar
26.Willson, S. Advanced skill mix in the breast care centre. Clinician Manag 2006; 14: 27–31.Google Scholar
27.Hertzburg, F, Mausner, B, Synderman, B. The motivation of work. In: Gibson J L, Ivancevich J M, Donnelly J H (eds). Organizations: Behaviour Structure and Processes, 5th edition. New York, NY: Business Publications, 1959: 114–115.Google Scholar
28.Curran, C. Shed that cocoon and fly. Nurs Econ (Editorial) 1994; 12: 4.Google Scholar
29.Carnwell, R, Daly, W. Advanced nursing practitioners in primary care settings: an exploration of the developing roles. J Clin Nurs 2003; 12: 630–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Sim, J, Zadnik, M, Radloff, A. University and workplace cultures: their impact on the development of lifelong learners. Radiography 2003; 9: 99–107.Google Scholar
31.Bolderston, A. Advanced practice perspectives in radiation therapy. J Radiother Pract 2004; 4: 57–65.Google Scholar
32.Eddy, A. Work-based learning and role extension: a match made in heaven? Radiography 2010; 16: 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Maluso-Bolton, T. Advanced practice clinicians, integrating advanced practice clinicians into your oncology practice. J Oncol Pract 2006; 2: 289–293.Google Scholar
34.Tye, C, Ross, F. Blurring boundaries: professional perspectives of the emergency nurse practitioner role in a major accident and emergency department. J Adv Nurs 2000; 31: 1089–1096.Google Scholar