Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:36:40.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dose verification of volumetric-modulated arc therapy using one-dimensional and two-dimensional dosimeters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2018

Jalil ur Rehman ,
Zahra Syed ,
Ghulam Hussain Open the ORCID record for Ghulam Hussain [Opens in a new window] ,
Nisar Ahmad ,
H M Noor ul Huda Khan Asghar ,
Zaheer Abbas Gilani ,
Gulfam Nasar ,
Malik M Akhter ,
Muhammad Isa  and
Tahir Iqbal
Jalil ur Rehman*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering & Management Sciences (BUITEMS), Quetta, Pakistan The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Zahra Syed
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering & Management Sciences (BUITEMS), Quetta, Pakistan
Ghulam Hussain*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering & Management Sciences (BUITEMS), Quetta, Pakistan
Nisar Ahmad
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering & Management Sciences (BUITEMS), Quetta, Pakistan
H M Noor ul Huda Khan Asghar
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering & Management Sciences (BUITEMS), Quetta, Pakistan
Zaheer Abbas Gilani
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering & Management Sciences (BUITEMS), Quetta, Pakistan
Gulfam Nasar
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, BUITEMS, Quetta, Pakistan
Malik M Akhter
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Science, BUITEMS, Quetta, Pakistan
Muhammad Isa
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Hafiz Hayat Campus University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan
Tahir Iqbal
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Hafiz Hayat Campus University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan
*
Author for correspondence: Jalil ur Rehman, Iqbal Hall, Department of Physics, FABS, BUITEMS, Quetta, Pakistan. Tel: +92-81-111-717-111 (EXT-641). E-mail: [email protected]; or Ghulam Hussain, [email protected]
Author for correspondence: Jalil ur Rehman, Iqbal Hall, Department of Physics, FABS, BUITEMS, Quetta, Pakistan. Tel: +92-81-111-717-111 (EXT-641). E-mail: [email protected]; or Ghulam Hussain, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Purpose

To verify dose delivery and quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for head and neck (H&N) cancer.

Method

The Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core Houston (IROC-H) H&N phantom with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and films, were imaged with computed tomography scan and the reconstructed image was transferred to pinnacle treatment planning system (TPS). On TPS, the planning target volume (PTV), secondary target volume (STV) and organ at risk (OAR) were delineated manually and a treatment plan was made. The dose constraints were determined for the concerned organs according to IROC-H prescription. The treatment plan was optimised using adoptive convolution algorithm to improve dose homogeneity and conformity. The dose calculation was performed using C.C Convolution algorithm and a Varian True Beam linear accelerator was used to deliver the treatment plan to the H&N phantom. The delivered radiation dose to the phantom was measured through TLDs and GafChromic external beam radiotherapy 2 (EBT2) films. The dosimetric performance of the VMAT delivery was studied by analysing percent dose difference, isodose line profile and gamma analysis of the TPS-computed dose and linac-delivered doses.

Result

The percent dose difference of 3.8% was observed between the planned and measured doses of TLDs and a 1.5-mm distance to agreement (DTA) was observed by comparing isodose line profiles. Passed the gamma criteria of 3%/3 mm was with good percentages.

Conclusion

The dosimetric performance of VMAT delivery for a challenging H&N radiotherapy can be verified using TLDs and films embedded in an anthropomorphic H&N phantom.

Keywords

head and neck cancerquality assurancethermoluminescent dosimetersVMAT
Type
Technical Note
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 304 - 308
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Cite this article: Rehman Ju, Syed Z, Hussain G, Ahmad N, Asghar HMNuHK, Gilani ZA, Nasar G, Akhter MM, Isa M, Iqbal T. (2019) Dose verification of volumetric-modulated arc therapy using one-dimensional and two-dimensional dosimeters. Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice18: 304–308. doi: 10.1017/S1460396918000559

References

1. Jemal, A, Siegel, R, Xu, J et al. Cancer statistics, 2010. Canc J Clin 2010; 60(5): 277–300.10.3322/caac.20073Google Scholar
2. Nutting, C M, James, P M, Kevin, J H et al. Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2011; 12(2): 127–136.10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70290-4Google Scholar
3. Purdy, J A. Dose to normal tissues outside the radiation therapy patient’s treated volume: a review of different radiation therapy techniques. Health Phys 2008; 95(5): 666–676.10.1097/01.HP.0000326342.47348.06Google Scholar
4. Hall, E J. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, protons, and the risk of second cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 65(1): 1–7.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.027Google Scholar
5. Zhang, P, Happersett, L, Hunt, M et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: planning and evaluation for prostate cancer cases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 76(5): 1456–1462.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.033Google Scholar
6. Johnston, M, Clifford, S, Bromley, R et al. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck radiotherapy: a planning comparison using simultaneous integrated boost for nasopharynx and oropharynx carcinoma. Clin Oncol 2011; 23(8): 503–511.10.1016/j.clon.2011.02.002Google Scholar
7. Ong, C L, Verbakel, W F, Cuijpers, J P et al. Stereotactic radiotherapy for peripheral lung tumors: a comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with 3 other delivery techniques. Radiother Oncol 2010; 97(3): 437–442.10.1016/j.radonc.2010.09.027Google Scholar
8. Lutjeboer, S, Rook, J W A, Stiekema, G et al. PV-0456: Volumetric modulated arc therapy for patients with bilateral breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2017; 123: S242–S243.10.1016/S0167-8140(17)30897-6Google Scholar
9. Studenski, M T, Bar-Ad, V, Siglin, J et al. Clinical experience transitioning from IMRT to VMAT for head and neck cancer. Med Dosimet 2013; 38(2): 171–175.10.1016/j.meddos.2012.10.009Google Scholar
10. Zulkafal, H M, Khan, M A, Ahmad, M W et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment planning assessment for low-risk prostate cancer in radiotherapy. Clin Canc Investigat J 2017; 6(4): 179.Google Scholar
11. Otto, K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys 2008; 35(1): 310–317.10.1118/1.2818738Google Scholar
12. Ling, C C, Zhang, P, Archambault, Y et al. Commissioning and quality assurance of RapidArc radiotherapy delivery system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 72(2): 575–581.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.060Google Scholar
13. Verbakel, W F, Cuijpers, J P, Hoffmans, D et al. Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 74(1): 252–259.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.033Google Scholar
14. Ruben, J D, Davis, S, Evans, C et al. The effect of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on radiation-induced second malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 70(5): 1530–1536.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.046Google Scholar
15. Ezzell, G A, Galvin, J M, Low, D et al. Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. Med Phys 2003; 30(8): 2089–2115.10.1118/1.1591194Google Scholar
16. Hartford, A C, Seung, S K, Larson, D A et al. American College of Radiology (ACR) and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) practice guideline for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Am J Clin Oncol 2012; 35(6): 612–617.10.1097/COC.0b013e31826e0515Google Scholar
17. Rehman, Ju, Iqbal, T, Tailor, R et al. Dosimetric comparison among different head and neck radiotherapy techniques using PRESAGE dosimeter. Int J Canc Ther Oncol 2015; [S.l.], v. 3, n. 4.10.14319/ijcto.34.9Google Scholar
18. Ur Rehman, J, Isa, M, Ahmad, N et al. Quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy head and neck cancer treatment using PRESAGE dosimeter. J Radiother Pract 2018; 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S146039691800016XGoogle Scholar
19. LoSasso, T, Chui, C S, Ling, C C. Comprehensive quality assurance for the delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy with a multileaf collimator used in the dynamic mode. Med Phys 2001; 28(11): 2209–2219.10.1118/1.1410123Google Scholar
20. Song, Y, Zhang, Q, Burman, C et al. Investigation of the compounding effect of MLC positioning uncertainty and gantry angular acceleration in VMAT delivery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81(2): S892.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.1598Google Scholar
21. Park, J, Wu, H G, Kim, J H et al. The effect of MLC speed and acceleration on the plan delivery accuracy of VMAT. Br J Radiol 2015; 88(1049): 20140698.10.1259/bjr.20140698Google Scholar
22. Lynch, B D, Kozelka, J, Ranade, M K et al. Important considerations for radiochromic film dosimetry with flatbed CCD scanners and EBT GAFCHROMIC film. Med Phys 2006; 33(12): 4551–4556.10.1118/1.2370505Google Scholar
23. Hasabelrasoul, H A. Estimation of uncertainty in TLD calibration. M.Sc. Thesis. Sudan: Sudan Academy of Science, 2013.Google Scholar