Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:57:07.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Clinical oral examinations: assessment of competence in radiation therapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

Michelle Leech*
Affiliation:
Division of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
A. Craig
Affiliation:
Division of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
C. Poole
Affiliation:
Division of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
M. Broderick
Affiliation:
Division of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
S. Ni Chuinneagain
Affiliation:
Division of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
M. Coffey
Affiliation:
Division of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
J. Byrne
Affiliation:
Division of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
*
Correspondence to: Michelle Leech, Division of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James’s Hospital Campus, Dublin 8, Ireland. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Matching assessment strategies to learning outcomes in radiation therapy education is of the utmost importance. Assessing clinical competence requires that ‘competence’ be clearly defined prior to the start of any clinical programme. In this article, we report on our experience in using clinical oral examinations in assessing competence in second year undergraduate radiation therapy students. The shortcomings of clinical oral examinations such as ‘leaking’ of the agenda are addressed and more positive attributes, such as increased collaboration between academic and clinical radiation therapists are discussed.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Zhang, Z, Luk, W, Arthur, D, Wong, T. Nursing competencies: personal characteristics contributing to effective nursing performance. 3J Adv Nurs 2001; 33:467474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Race, P. The Lecturer’s Toolkit: A practical guide to learning, teaching and assessment. London: Kogan Page, 2001.Google Scholar
Freeman, R, Lewis, R. Planning and Implementing Assessment. London: Routledge Falmer, 2002.Google Scholar
Wakeford, R, Southgate, L, Wass, V. Improving oral examinations: selecting, training and monitoring examiners for the MRCGP. Royal College of General practitioners. 3Br Med J 1995; 311:931935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambers, MA. Some issues in the assessment of clinical practice: a review of the literature. 3J Clin Nurs 1998; 7:201208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradshaw, A. Defining ‘competency’ in nursing (Part II): an analytical review. 3J Clin Nurs 1998; 7:103111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bearn, DR, Chadwick, SM, Jack, AC, Sackville, A. Orthodontic undergraduate education: assessment in a modern curriculum. 3Eur J Dental Educ 2002; 6:162168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar