Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T17:10:52.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiotherapy couches: is kevlar an obstacle? Attenuation study of three different tabletops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2016

Célia Silva ,
Dalila Mateus ,
Sandra Vieira ,
Milton Rodrigues ,
Margarida Eiras  and
Carlo Greco
Célia Silva*
Affiliation:
Centro Clínico Fundação Champalimaud, Lisbon, Portugal Escola Superior de Tecnologias da Saúde de Lisboa, Portugal
Dalila Mateus
Affiliation:
Centro Clínico Fundação Champalimaud, Lisbon, Portugal
Sandra Vieira
Affiliation:
Centro Clínico Fundação Champalimaud, Lisbon, Portugal
Milton Rodrigues
Affiliation:
Centro Clínico Fundação Champalimaud, Lisbon, Portugal
Margarida Eiras
Affiliation:
Escola Superior de Tecnologias da Saúde de Lisboa, Portugal
Carlo Greco
Affiliation:
Centro Clínico Fundação Champalimaud, Lisbon, Portugal
*
Correspondence to: Celia Silva, Outeiro Cacho, 8 Loureira, 2495-161 Santa Catarina da Serra, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction

Treatment tabletops are usually made of carbon fibre due to its high mechanical strength and rigidity, low specific density, extremely light and regularly considered radiotranslucent. Our clinic acquired a Calypso 4D Localization System where electromagnetic (EM) frequencies to detect implanted transponders in the patient are used. Carbon fibre is an electrical conductive material which interferes with EM frequencies. Therefore, in order to be able to use the Calypso System the carbon fibre tabletop in the treatment room must be replaced. It is our goal to determine the attenuation of the new, non-carbon fibre, tabletop in treatment delivery.

Materials and Methods

Measurements were performed using an ionisation chamber inserted in a slab phantom positioned at the isocenter for 6, 10 MV, 6 and 10flattening filter free (FFF) MV photon beams. These measurements were performed with and without tabletop for 0°, 30° and 60° beam angle for a True Beam STx linac, for 5×5 cm2 and 10×10 cm2 field size beams. The attenuation was calculated for each measurement for each tabletop.

Results

At 0° incidence on the Exact IGRT Couch, the measured attenuation for 10×10 cm2 was 2·8 and 2·1% for 6 and 10 MV beams, respectively. For the same field size was measured 3·3 and 2·6% attenuation for 6 and 10 FFF MV beams, respectively. At the same incidence and regarding the other tabletops, the calculated attenuation is lower. For 10×10 cm2 field, there is 2·0, 1·4, 2·1 and 2·6% attenuation for 6, 10 MV, 6 and 10 FFF MV energy beams on the kVueTM Universal Couch. For the KvueTM Calypso® Couch 10×10 cm2 irradiation field, the measurements were 1·6, 1·3, 1·9 and 1·5%, respectively. This tendency is observed for all gantry angles.

Discussion

The attenuation outputs were definitely higher for the Varian Exact IGRT Couch when compared with the kVue tabletops. The attenuation measurements for the kVue tabletops were closer to each other. Nevertheless kVueTM Calypso® Varian tabletop showed smaller mean attenuation of the beams than kVueTM Universal Tip Insert for all measurements.

Conclusions

There was no loss in treatment quality administration due to beam attenuation in the tabletop when tabletops were exchanged because of Calypso system integration. There is no need to change between kVue tabletops whenever there is a regular treatment or a Calypso System guided treatment.

Keywords

Calypsotabletopattenuationcarbon fiberkevlar
Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 346 - 353
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kitamura, K, Shirato, H, Shimizu, S et al. Registration accuracy and possible migration of internal fiducial gold marker implanted in prostate and liver treated with real-time tumor tracking radiation therapy (RTRT). Radiother Oncol 2002; 62: 275–281.Google Scholar
2. Kitamura, K, Shirato, H, Seppenwoolde, Y et al. Three-dimensional intrafractional movement of prostate measured during real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy in supine and prone treatment positions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 53: 1117–1123.Google Scholar
3. Shirato, H, Harada, T, Harabayashi, T et al. Feasibility of insertion/implantation of 2·0-mm-diameter gold internal fiducial markers for precise setup and real-time tumor tracking in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 56: 240–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Dawson, LA, Brock, KK, Kazanjian, S et al. The reproducibility of organ position using active breathing control (ABC) during liver radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 51: 1410–1421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Balter, JM, Lam, KL, Sandler, HM et al. Automated localization of the prostate at the time of treatment using implanted radiopaque markers: technical feasibility. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 33: 1281–1286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Meydanci, TP, Kemikler, G. Effect of a carbon fiber tabletop on the surface dose and attenuation for high-energy photon beams. Radiat Med 2008; 26: 539–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Wen, J. Electromagnetic tracking for medical imaging. Master Thesis. Saint Louis, MO: Washington University, 2010.Google Scholar
8. de Mooy, LG. The use of carbon fibers in radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 1991; 22 (2): 140–142.Google Scholar
9. Bratengeier, K, Baur, W, Baier, K et al. A table top suited for CT and radiotherapy. Med Phys 2004; 14: 118–122.Google Scholar
10. Gillis, S, Bral, S, De Wagter, C et al. Evaluation of the Sinmed Mastercouch as replacement for a standard couch. Radiother Oncol 2005; 75: 227–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Hufton, AP, Russell, JG. The use of carbon fibre material in table tops, cassette fonds and grid covers: magnitude of possible dose reduction. Br J Radiol 1986; 59: 157–163.Google Scholar
12. Rau, AW. Real-time tumor localization with electromagnetic transponders for image-guided radiotherapy applications. PhD Thesis. Heidelberg, Germany: Ruperto-Carola University, 2009.Google Scholar
13. Seppälä, JKH, Kulmala, JAJ. Increased beam attenuation and surface dose by different couch inserts of treatment tables used in megavoltage radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2011; 12 (4): 15–23.Google Scholar
14. Meara, SJ, Langmack, KA. An investigation into the use of carbon fibre for megavoltage radiotherapy applications. Phys Med Biol 1998; 43 (5): 1359–1366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Spezi, E, Ferri, A. Dosimetric characteristics of the Siemens IGRT carbon fiber tabletop. Med Dosim 2007; 32 (4): 295–298.Google Scholar
16. McCormack, S, Diffey, J, Morgan, A. The effect of gantry angle on megavoltage photon beam attenuation by a carbon fiber couch insert. Med Phys 2005; 32 (2): 483–487.Google Scholar
17. Quigley, MM, Mate, TP, Sylvester, JE. Prostate tumor alignment and continuous, real-time adaptive radiation therapy using electromagnetic fiducials: clinical and cost-utility analyses. Urol Oncol 2009; 27: 473–482.Google Scholar
18. Kwolek, S. Wholly aromatic carbocyclic polycarbonate fiber having orientation angle of less than about 45 degrees. US3819587 (Patent). 1974.Google Scholar
19. Li, H, Lee, AK, Johnson, JL, Zhu, RX, Kudchadker, RJ. Characterization of dose impact on IMRT and VMAT from couch attenuation for two Varian couches. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2011; 12 (3): 23–31.Google Scholar
20. Myint, WK, Niedbala, M, Wilkins, D, Gerig, LH. Investigating treatment dose error due to beam attenuation by a carbon fiber tabletop. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2006; 7 (3): 21–27.Google Scholar
21. Njeh, CF, Raines, TW, Saunders, MW. Determination of the photon beam attenuation by the BrainLAB imaging couch: angular and field size dependence. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2009; 10 (3): 16–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Vanetti, E, Nicolini, G, Clivio, A, Fogliata, A, Cozzi, L. The impact of treatment couch modelling on RapidArc. Phys Med Biol 2009; 54 (9): N157–N166.Google Scholar
23. Vieira, SC, Kaatee, RS, Dirkx, ML, Heijmen, BJ. Two-dimensional measurement of photon beam attenuation by the treatment couch and immobilization devices using an electronic portal imaging device. Med Phys 2003; 30 (11): 2981–2987.Google Scholar