Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:57:22.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fingerprint recognition to assist daily identification of radiotherapy patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

J.-E. Palmgren  and
T. Lahtinen
J.-E. Palmgren*
Affiliation:
Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
T. Lahtinen
Affiliation:
Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
*
Correspondence to: J.-E. Palmgren, Department of Oncology, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 1777, FIN-70211, Kuopio, Finland. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A system to assist daily identification of radiotherapy patients and to prevent accidental exposures to mis-indentified patients was developed. The fingerprint-based biometric system was chosen because of its high sensitivity in identification and suitability for hospital use. In a 6-month survey, 85.7% of the daily treatment fractions were identified successfully; 5.5% of the unsuccessful identifications were overridden by the staff and the remaining 8.8% were due to poor-quality fingerprints. No false identifications occurred so that patient was identified as a different person. During the past 2.5 years and 47,000 treatment fractions, the system has been well accepted by the patients and radiation technologists and misidentified patients have not been treated since the installation.

Keywords

Fingerprint recognitionradiotherapypatient verificationmistreatmentbiometric identification
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 17 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ortiz, P, Andreo, P, Cosset, J-M, Dutreix, A, Landberg, T, Pinillos, LV, Yin, W, Biggs, PJ. Prevention of accidental exposures to patients undergoing radiation therapy. ICRP publication 86, Annals of the ICRP Vol. 30/3:2001.Google Scholar
Lahtinen, T, Palmgren, J-E.Prevention of exposures to wrong patients by biometric recognition of patient fingerprints. Radiother Oncol 2004; 73: S493.Google Scholar
Hakimzadaa, AF, Greenb, RA, Sayanb, OR, Zhangc, J, Patel, VL.The nature and occurrence of registration errors in the emergency department. Int J Med Inform 2008; 77: 169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdley, WS.Personal digital assistants, wireless computing, smart cards, and biometrics: a hardware update for clinical practice. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2006; 35: 157–163.Google Scholar
Moser, L.Positive identification. Fingerprint images identify patients under any circumstances. Health Manag Technol 2000; 21: 22.Google Scholar
Corby, PM, Schleyer, T, Spallek, H, Hart, TC, Weyant, RJ, Corby, AL, Bretz, AB.Using biometrics for participant identification in a research study: a case report. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13: 233–235.Google Scholar
Arranz-Marquez, E, Teus, MA, Saornil, MA, Mendez, MC, Gil, R.Analysis of irises with a latanoprost-induced change in iris color. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 138: 625–630.Google Scholar
Appleby, C.Patient registration. No one leaves home without it. Hosp Health Netw 1997; 71(3): 72–73.Google Scholar
Marietta, GA.Patient fingerprinting speeds up registrations, cuts medical records backlog, mistakes. Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep 1997; 2(9): 133–135.Google Scholar
Burdine, CI.Thumbs up for positive patient identification. NAHAM Manage J 1997; 23(4): 3, 10.Google Scholar
Poels, K, Hanbeukers, B, Offerman-Wulms, C, Mond van de, M, Velders, M, Visser, P, Backes, H, Lambin, P.Fingerprint: let your fingers do the talking. Radiother Oncol 2006; 81: S163.Google Scholar