Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:43:46.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incorporation is Not Enough: The Agenda Influence of Black Lawmakers in Congressional Committees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2020

Periloux C. Peay Open the ORCID record for Periloux C. Peay [Opens in a new window]
Periloux C. Peay*
Affiliation:
Georgia State University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Periloux C. Peay, Department of Political Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Traditionally, scholars argue that the committee structure is central to the policymaking process in congress, and that those that wield the gavel in committees enjoy a great deal of influence over the legislative agenda. The most recent iterations of Congress are more diverse than ever before. With 55 members—of whom, five chair full committees and 28 sit atop subcommittees—the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) is in a place to wield a significant leverage over the legislative agenda in the 116th Congress. However, noticeable proportional gains in minority membership in Congress have yet to produce sizable policy gains for the communities they represent. An examination of bill sponsorship from the 103rd–112th congresses reveals underlying institutional forces—i.e., marginalization and negative agenda setting—leave Black lawmakers at a distinct disadvantage compared to their non-black counterparts. Bills in policy areas targeted by the CBC are subject to disproportionate winnowing in congressional committees. Unfortunately, a number of institutional resources often found to increase a bill's prospects—including placements and leadership on committees with jurisdiction over policy areas of interest—are relatively ineffective for CBC members looking to forward those key issues onto the legislative agenda.

Keywords

Congressional Black CaucusRepresentationAgenda SettingBlack Politics
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , July 2021 , pp. 402 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © The Race, Ethnicity, and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, E. Scott, and Wilkerson, John D.. 2018. “Congressional Bills Project.” http://congressionalbills.org/index.html.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties?: The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 2005. “Congressional Committees in a Partisan era.” In Congress Reconsidered. 8:249–70. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, Edith J. 1995. “The Policy Priorities of African American Women in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (2): 223–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 2002. Policy Dynamics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Jones, Bryan D., and MacLeod, Michael C.. 2000. “The Evolution of Legislative Jurisdictions.” The Journal of Politics 62 (2): 321–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., et al. et al. . 2009. “Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (3): 603–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A. 2006. “The Behavior and Success of Latino Legislators: Evidence from the States.” Social Science Quarterly 87 (5): 1136–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Haynie, Kerry L.. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” The Journal of Politics 61 (3): 658–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broockman, David E. 2013. “Black Politicians Are More Intrinsically Motivated to Advance Blacks’ Interests: A Field Experiment Manipulating Political Incentives.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (3): 521–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Rufus P., Marshall, Dale Rogers, and Tabb, David H.. 1986. “Protest Is Not Enough: A Theory of Political Incorporation.” PS 19 (3): 576–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, Charles S. 1973. “Committee Transfers in the United States House of Representatives.” The Journal of Politics 35 (1): 85–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Charles, Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1996. “Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?” The American Political Science Review 90 (4): 794–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, David T. 1995. “Redistricting and the Congressional Black Caucus.” American Politics Quarterly 23 (2): 159–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, David T. 1999. Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, Jamie L., Finocchiaro, Charles J., and Rohde, David W.. 2010. “Consensus, Conflict, and Partisanship in House Decision Making: A Bill-Level Examination of Committee and Floor Behavior.” Congress & the Presidency 37 (3): 231–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, Shirley. 1970. Unbought and Unbossed. Boston: Take Root Media.Google Scholar
Choirat, Christine, Honaker, James, Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Lau, Olivia. 2018. Zelig: Everyone's Statistical Software. http://zeligproject.org/.Google Scholar
Cobb, Roger W., and Ross, Marc Howard. 1997. Cultural Strategies of Agenda Denial: Avoidance, Attack, and Redefinition. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Congressional Black Caucus. 2018. “Statement from CBC Chairman on the Appointment of Booker, Harris to Senate Judiciary Committee.” Congressional Black Caucus. https://cbc.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=827.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2007. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Michael C, and Cohen, Cathy. 2002. “Problems in the Study of the Politics of Race.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, 488–510. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Deering, Christopher J., and Smith, Steven S.. 1997. Committees in Congress. Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Ellis, William Curtis, and Wilson, Walter Clark. 2013. “Minority Chairs and Congressional Attention to Minority Issues: The Effect of Descriptive Representation in Positions of Institutional Power.” Social Science Quarterly 94 (5): 1207–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Addison Wesley School.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Friedman, Sally. 1996. “House Committee Assignments of Women and Minority Newcomers, 1965–1994.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 21 (1): 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, Scott A., and Kelly, Sean Q.. 2004. “Self-Selection Reconsidered: House Committee Assignment Requests and Constituency Characteristics.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (2): 325–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, Scott A., and Kelly, Sean Q.. 2006. Committee Assignment Politics in the U.S. House of Representatives. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Frymer, Paul. 2010. Uneasy Alliances: Race and Party Competition in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gamble, Katrina L. 2007. “Black Political Representation: An Examination of Legislative Activity within U. S. House Committees.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (3): 421–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, Katrina L. 2011. “Invisible Black Politics: An Analysis of Black Congressional Leadership from the Inside.” PS: Political Science and Politics 44 (2): 463–67.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Andra. 2010. Whose Black Politics?: Cases in Post-Racial Black Leadership. Abigndon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmer, Justin, and Powell, Eleanor Neff. 2013. “Congressmen in Exile: The Politics and Consequences of Involuntary Committee Removal.” The Journal of Politics 75 (4): 907–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, John D., and Keane, Michael. 2011. “Are African Americans Effectively Represented in Congress?” Political Research Quarterly 64 (1): 145–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinier, Lani. 1991. “The Triumph of Tokenism: The Voting Rights Act and the Theory of Black Electoral Success.” Michigan Law Review 89 (5): 1077–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard L., and Lawrence Evans, C.. 1990. “The Power of Subcommittees.” The Journal of Politics 52 (2): 335–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions.” The American Political Science Review 97 (4): 529–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Thomas C. 2009. The Problem of Race in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. 1994. Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, Desmond S., and Smith, Rogers M.. 2005. “Racial Orders in American Political Development.” The American Political Science Review 99 (1): 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 2011. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Koger, Gregory. 2003. “Position Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28 (2): 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1995. “Cosponsors and Wafflers From A to Z.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 906–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krutz, Glen S. 2005. “Issues and Institutions: “Winnowing” in the U.S. Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 313–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, Wayne A., and Lopez, Edward J.. 2002. “Committee Assignments and the Cost of Party Loyalty.” Political Research Quarterly 55 (1): 59–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. “American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory.” Ed. by Bauer, Raymond A., Dexter, Lewis A., and de Sola Pool, Ithiel. World Politics 16 (4): 677–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lublin, David. 1999. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes”.” The Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, Nicholas A. 1961. “Committee Assignments in the House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 55 (2): 345–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Donald R. 1960. United States Senators and Their World. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Cheryl M. 1989. “Agenda-Setting by State Legislative Black Caucuses: Policy Priorities and Factors of Success.” Review of Policy Research 9(2): 339–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minta, Michael D. 2011. Oversight: Representing the Interests of Blacks and Latinos in Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Minta, Michael D., and Sinclair-Chapman, Valeria. 2013. “Diversity in Political Institutions and Congressional Responsiveness to Minority Interests.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (1): 127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mixon, Franklin G., and Pagels, Amanda C.. 2007. “Are Congressional Black Caucus Members More Reliable? Loyalty Screening and Committee Assignments of Newly Elected Legislators.” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 66 (2): 413–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mixon, Franklin G., and Ressler, Rand W.. 2001. “Loyal Political Cartels and Committee Assignments in Congress: Evidence from the Congressional Black Caucus.” Public Choice 108 (3): 313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Paul E. 2012. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1968. “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives.” The American Political Science Review 62 (1): 144–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2000. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rocca, Michael S., Sanchez, Gabriel R., and Morin, Jason L.. 2011. “The Institutional Mobility of Minority Members of Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 64(4): 897–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer. 1975. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Schiller, Wendy J. 1995. “Senators as Political Entrepreneurs: Using Bill Sponsorship to Shape Legislative Agendas.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 186–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Judy. 2013. “House Committee Reports: Required Contents”: 3.Google Scholar
Scoble, Harry. 1971. “A Process model to Model to Study Political Repression.” Department of Political Science, UCLA.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1949. TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. Vol. 3. Univ of California Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1978. The Giant Jigsaw Puzzle: Democratic Committee Assignments in the Modern House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” The American Political Science Review 81 (1): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1985. “Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science.” American Political Science Review 79(2): 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1986. “The Role of Committees in Agenda Setting in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 11 (1): 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Robert S. 1998. The Congressional Black Caucus: Racial Politics in the United States Congress. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert C. 1996. We Have No Leaders: African Americans in the Post-Civil Rights Era. SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Swain, Carol M. 1993. Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress. Enlarged ed. Lanham, Md: UPA.Google Scholar
Tate, Katherine. 2001. “The Political Representation of Blacks in Congress: Does Race Matter?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (4): 623–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, Katherine. 2003. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and Their Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, Katherine. 2014. Concordance: Black Lawmaking in the U.S. Congress from Carter to Obama. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyson, Vanessa. 2016. Twists of Fate: Multiracial Coalitions and Minority Representation in the US House of Representatives. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig, and Wiseman, Alan E.. 2014. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress: The Lawmakers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitby, Kenny J. 2000. The Color of Representation: Congressional Behavior and Black Interests. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Walter Clark. 2010. “Descriptive Representation and Latino Interest Bill Sponsorship in Congress.” Social Science Quarterly 91(4): 1043–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Workman, Samuel, Jones, Bryan, and Jochim, Ashley. 2009. “Information Processing and Policy Dynamics.” Policy Studies Journal 37(1): 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Workman, Samuel, Shafran, JoBeth, and Bark, Tracey. 2017. “Problem Definition and Information Provision by Federal Bureaucrats.” Cognitive Systems Research 43(Supplement C): 140–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Peay Supplementary Materials

Peay Supplementary Materials

Download Peay Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 1.2 MB