No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Immigration, Policy Exclusion, and State-Level Inequality in TANF Usage
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 June 2022
Abstract
The relationship between immigration and welfare provision is at the heart of welfare politics research. While prior studies have examined how immigration affects welfare generosity, less is known about the consequences of exclusive welfare policies and immigration on social inequality. In this paper, by using TANF as the policy context, we offer a systematic examination of how immigration combined with state immigrant welfare policies affect inequality in welfare usage between citizens and immigrants. Using data across the fifty American states from 2001 to 2016, we find evidence that exclusive state immigrant TANF policies are a key source of decreased immigrant TANF caseload rate and enlarged citizen-immigrant TANF caseload gap. Moreover, states’ immigrant population density moderates the effect of state immigrant welfare eligibility policies on immigrant TANF caseload rate and citizen-immigrant TANF caseload gap. Our robustness checks by using alternative measures of the dependent variable and key independent variable verify these findings.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Race, Ethnicity, and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association
References
Almeida, J, Biello, KB, Pedraza, F, Wintner, S and Viruell-Fuentes, E. (2016) The association between anti-immigrant policies and perceived discrimination among latinos in the US: a multilevel analysis. SSM - Population Health 21 , 897–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, L. (2008) Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, N. (2001) Time-series-cross-section-data: what have we learned in the past few years? Annual Review of Political Science 4, 271–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, N and Katz, JN. (1996) Nuisance vs. substance: specifying and estimating time-series-cross-section models. Political Analysis 6, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, SH. (2001) Why are Welfare Caseloads Falling?. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Berry, WD, Fording, RC, Ringquist, EJ, Hanson, RL and Klarner, C. (2013) A new measure of state government ideology, and evidence that both the new measure and an old measure are valid. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 13(2), pp.164–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, WD, Ringquist, EJ, Fording, RC and Hanson, RL. (1998) Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960–93. American Journal of Political Science 42 (1), 327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, M, Luttmer, EFP and Mullainathan, S. (2000) Network effects and welfare cultures. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 1019–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitler, M, Gelbach, J and Hoynes, H. (2005) Welfare reform and health. The Journal of Human Resources 40 (2), 309–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bitler, MP and Hoynes, HW. (2013) Immigrants, welfare reform, and the U.S. saftey net. In Card, D and Raphael, S (eds), Immigration, Poverty, and Socioeconomic Inequality. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 315–380.Google Scholar
Blau, PM. (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Borjas, GJ. (2001) Welfare reform and immigration. In Rebecca, MB, Haskins, R (eds), The New World of Welfare. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 369–385.Google Scholar
Bradley, D, Huber, E, Moller, S, Nielsen, F and Stephens, JD. (2003) Distribution and redistribution in postindustrial democracies. World Politics 55, 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colbern, A and Ramakrishnan, SK. (2021) Citizenship Reimagined: A New Framework for State Rights in the United States. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Commins, MM. (2021) Citizenship reimagined: a new framework for state rights in the United States, by Allan Colbern and S. Karthick Ramakrishnan. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 51 (3), e20–e22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condon, M, Filindra, A and Wichowsky, A. (2016) Immigrant inclusion in the safety net: a framework for analysis and effects on educational attainment. Policy Studies Journal 44 (4), 424–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boef, S and Keele, L. (2008) Taking time seriously. American Journal of Political Science 52 (1), 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLeire, T, Levine, JA and Levy, H. (2006) Is welfare reform responsible for low-skilled women’s declining health insurance coverage in the 1990s? The Journal of Human Resources 41 (3), 495–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellwood, DT. (2000) Winners and losers in America: taking the measure of the new economic realities. In A Working Nation, eds. Lynn-Dyson, Karen, Niskanen, William A, Kruse, Douglas, Blasi, Joseph, Blank, Rebecca M. and Ellwood, David T.. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 1–41.Google Scholar
Erikson, RS, Wright, GC and McIver, JP. (1993) Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ernst, R, Nguyen, L and Taylor, KC. (2013) Citizen control: race at the welfare office. Social Science Quarterly 94 (5), 1283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esses, VM, Dovidio, JF, Jackson, LM and Armstrong, TL. (2001) The immigration dilemma: the role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues 57 (3), 389–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filindra, A, Blanding, D and Coll, CG. (2011) The power of context: state-level policies and politics and the educational performance of the children of immigrants in the United States. Harvard Educational Review 81 (3), 163–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filindra, A and Manatschal, A. (2020) Coping with a changing integration policy context: American state policies and their effects on immigrant political engagement. Regional Studies 54 (11), 1546–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filindra, Alexandra and Goodman, Sara W.. (2019) Studying public policy through immigration policy: advances in theory and measurement. Policy Studies Journal 47 (3), 498–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fix, ME and Passel, J. (2002) The Scope and Impact of Welfare Reform’s Immigrant Provisions. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Fix, ME and Passel, JS. (1999) Trends in Noncitizens’ and Citizens’ use of Public Benefits Following Welfare Reform: 1994-97. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Fox, C. (2012) Three Worlds of Relief: Race, Immigration, and the American Welfare State from the Progressive Era to the New Deal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda. (1994) Pitied but Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gulasekaram, P and Ramakrishnan, SK. (2015) The New Immigration Federalism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagan, J, Rodriguez, N, Capps, R and Kabiri, N. (2003) The effects of recent welfare and immigration reforms on immigrants’ access to health care. International Migration Review 37 (2), 444–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, SJ, Schoeni, RF, Bao, Y and Danielson, C. (2004) Immigrants, welfare reform, and the economy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23 (4), 745–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hero, RE. (1998) Faces of Inequality: Social Diversity in American Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hero, RE and Preuhs, RR. (2007) Immigration and the evolving American welfare state: examining policies in the U.S. states. American Journal of Political Science 51 (3), 498–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbs, DA. Jr (1977) Political parties and macroeconomic policy. The American Political Science Review 71 (4), 1467–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, HO. (2013) Minority policies and political participation among latinos: exploring latinos’ response to substantive representation. Social Science Quarterly 94, 1245–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandula, NR, Grogan, CM, Rathouz, PJ and Lauderdale, DS. (2004) The unintended impact of welfare reform on the medicaid enrollment of eligible immigrants. Health Services Research 39 (5), 1509–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaushal, N and Kaestner, R. (2005) Welfare reform and health insurance of immigrants. Health Services Research 40 (3), 697–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keiser, LR., Mueser, PR and Choi, S-W. (2004) Race, bureaucratic discretion, and the implementation of welfare reform. American Journal of Political Science 48 (2), 314–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, VO. Jr (1949) Southern Politics in State and Nation. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Ku, L. (2009) Changes in immigrants’ use of medicaid and food stamps: the role of eligibility and other factors. In Immigrants and Welfare: The Impact of Welfare Reform on America’s Newcomers, ed. Michael, E. Fix. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 153–92.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, MS and Rice, TW. (1985) Government growth in the United States. The Journal of Politics 47 (1), 2–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Robert. (1998) Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lofstrom, M and Bean, FD. (2002) Assessing immigrant policy options: labor market conditions and postreform declines in immigrants’ receipt of welfare. Demography 39 (4), 617–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lowery, D and Berry, WD. (1983) The growth of government in the united states: an empirical assessment of competing explanations. American Journal of Political Science 27 (4), 665–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, BD and Mittag, N. (2019) Using linked survey and administrative data to better measure income: implications for poverty, program effectiveness and holes in the safety net. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 11 (2), 176–204.Google Scholar
Meyer, BD, Mittag, N and George, RM. (2018) Errors in survey reporting and imputation and their effects on estimates of food stamp program participation. National Bureau of Economic Research: Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, BD, Mok, WKC and Sullivan, JX. (2015) Household surveys in crisis. Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (4), 199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michener, J. (2018) Fragmented democracy: Medicaid, federalism, and unequal politics. New York, United States: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molina, N. (2014) How Race is made in America: Immigration, Citizenship, and the Historical Power of Racial Scripts. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ngai, MM. (2004) Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, VC, LeBrón, AMW and Pedraza, FI. (2018) Spillover effects: immigrant policing and government skepticism in matters of health for latinos. Public Administration Review 78 (3), 432–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedraza, FI, Nichols, WC and LeBrón, AMW. (2017) Cautious citizenship: the deterring effect of immigration issue salience on health care use and bureaucratic interactions among latino US citizens. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 42 (5), 925–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perreira, KM and Pedroza, JM. (2019) Policies of exclusion: implications for the health of immigrants and their children. Annual Review Public Health 40, 147–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preuhs, RR. (2007) Descriptive representation as a mechanism to mitigate policy backlash: latino incorporation and welfare policy in the American states. Political Research Quarterly 60 (2), 277–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocco, P., (2018) Fragmented democracy: medicaid, federalism, and unequal politics. Perspectives on Politics 16 (4), 1166–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reese, Ellen. (2005) Backlash against Single Mothers with Children: Past and Present. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha, RR, Hawes, DP, Fryar, AH and Wrinkle, RD. (2014) Policy climates, enforcement rates, and migrant behavior: is self-deportation a viable immigration policy. Policy Studies Journal 42 (1), 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha, RR, Knoll, BR and Wrinkle, RD. (2015) Immigration enforcement and the redistribution of political trust. The Journal of Politics 77 (4), 901–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury, D. (2012) Welfare States and Immigrant Rights: The Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sainsbury, D. (2016) Gender, migration and social policy. In Gary Freeman and Nikola Mirilovic (eds), Handbook on migration and social policy. Northampton, Massachusetts, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Schneider, A and Ingram, H. (1993) Social construction of target populations: implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review 87 (2), 334–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shear, MD and Sullivan, E. (2019) Trump Policy Favors Wealthier Immigrants for Green Cards. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/12/us/politics/trump-immigration-policy.html?campaign_id=60&instance_id=0&segment_id=16081&user_id=ded2ef8e35f77f2f6b009de8a3d51980®i_id=57589238ing-news.Google Scholar
Smith, RM. (2021) Legal Civic Orders and Equitable Lived Citizenships.” American Political Science Review First View:1–15.Google Scholar
Soss, J., Fording, R.C. and Schram, S.F., (2008) The color of devolution: race, federalism, and the politics of social control. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), pp.536–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soss, J, Schram, SF, Vartanian, TP and O’brien, E (2001) Setting the terms of relief: explaining state policy choices in the devolution revolution. American Journal of Political Science 45 (2), 378–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuber, J and Kronebusch, K. (2004) Stigma and other determinants of participation in TANF and medicaid. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23 (3), 509–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tolbert, CJ and Hero, RE. (2001) Dealing with diversity: racial/ethnic context and social policy change. Political Research Quarterly 54 (3), 571–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, M, Wittenberg, J and King, G. (2003) Clarify: software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Journal of Statistical Software 8 (1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, ER. (1980) Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tumlin, KC, Zimmermann, W and Ost, J. (1999) State Snapshots of Public Benefits for Immigrants: A Supplemental Report to Patchwork Policies. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. (1999) Historical Census Statistics on the Foreign Born Population: 1850-1990. https://www.census.gov/library/working-papers/1999/demo/POP-twps0029.html.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. (2007) American Community Survey: Place of Birth by Year of Entry by Citizenship Status for the Foreign-Born Population. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2007/demo/foreign-born/cps-2007.html.Google Scholar
Van Hook, J. (2003) Welfare reform’s chilling effects on non-citizens: changes in non-citizen welfare recipiency or shifts in citizenship status? Social Science Quarterly 84 (3), 613–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Oorschot, W J H. (1991) Non-take-up of social security benefits in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 1 (1), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, J, Dawsey, J and Sonmez, F. (2018) Trump vows executive order to end birthright citizenship, a move most legal experts say would run afoul of the Constitution. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-eyeing-executive-order-to-end-citizenship-for-children-of-noncitizens-born-on-us-soil/2018/10/30/66892050-dc29-11e8-b3f0-62607289efee_story.html?noredirect=on.Google Scholar
Watson, T. (2014) Inside the refrigerator: immigration enforcement and chilling effects in medicaid participation. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6 (3), 313–38.Google Scholar
Yoo, G J. (2008) Immigrants and welfare: policy constructions of deservingness. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 6 (4), 490–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, W and Fix, ME. (1998) Declining Immigrant Applications for Medi-Cal and Welfare Benefits in Los Angeles County. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Xu and Zhu supplementary material
Xu and Zhu supplementary material
File
205.1 KB