Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:02:06.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Civic Culture(s): Groups, Norms, and the Health of Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2020

Jon Kingzette Open the ORCID record for Jon Kingzette [Opens in a new window]  and
Michael A. Neblo
Jon Kingzette*
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Michael A. Neblo
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Jon Kingzette, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Democratic institutions need a healthy “civic culture” to function well. Many worry that civic cultures today are decaying in the United States and other established democracies. We note two problems with these assessments. First, there are several ways to measure civic culture, but scholars typically focus only on their preferred approach. Second, most scholars assume a single civic culture, despite racial, ethnic, class, and other differences. So talk of “the” civic culture erases non-dominant groups. Without a framework to integrate different approaches and account for group variation, we cannot assess decline, nor specify for whom. And without those, we are unable to intervene to make things better. We introduce a theory of civic culture as a system of norms that integrates the main approaches to measuring civic culture and does so in a way that leads to a principled framework for understanding racial, ethnic, and other group variation within countries.

Keywords

Civic culturegroup attitudesdemocratic theorydemocratic norms
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 144 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Race, Ethnicity, and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron. 2017. “We Are the Last Defense Against Trump.” Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/01/18/we-are-the-last-defense-against-trump-institutions/.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Danielle S. 2004. Talking to Strangers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel Abraham, and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Michael, and McCarty, Nolan. 2013. “Causes and Consequences of Polarization.” In Negotiating Agreement in Politics, eds. Mansbridge, Jane and Martin, Cathie Jo. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, 19–53.Google Scholar
Barroso, Amanda, and Minkin, Rachel. 2020. “Recent Protest Attendees are More Racially and Ethnically Diverse, Younger than Americans Overall.” Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/06/24/recent-protest-attendees-are-more-racially-and-ethnically-diverse-younger-than-americans-overall/.Google Scholar
Bessette, Joseph M. 1997. The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Buyuker, Beyza. 2018. “Democracy and the ‘Other’: Out-Group Attitudes and Support for Anti-Democratic Norms.” Paper presented at the 2018 annual conference of American Political Science Association, Boston, MA (August 30–September 2, 2018).Google Scholar
Carey, John M., Helmke, Gretchen, Nyhan, Brendan, Sanders, Mitchell, and Stokes, Susan. 2019. “Searching for Bright Lines in the Trump Presidency.” Perspectives on Politics 17 (3): 699–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer Walsh, Katherine. 2004. Talking About Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
De Tocqueville, Alexis. 2006 [1835, 1840]. Democracy in America. Trans. Lawrence, George. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1975. “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science 5: 435–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliasoph, Nina. 1998. Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esterling, K.M., Neblo, M.A., and Lazer, D.M. 2011. “Means, Motive, and Opportunity in Becoming Informed about Politics: A Deliberative Field Experiment with Members of Congress and their Constituents.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (3): 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, James S. 2018. Democracy When the People are Thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, Joseph, and Pozen, David E.. 2018. “Asymmetric Constitutional Hardball.” Columbia Law Review 118 (3): 915–82.Google Scholar
Goold, S.D., Neblo, M.A., Kim, S.Y., Vries, R.D., Rowe, G., and Muhlberger, P.. 2012. “What is Good Public Deliberation?” Hastings Center Report 42 (2): 24–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, Matthew H., and Svolik, Milan W.. 2020. “Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States.” American Political Science Review 114 (2): 392–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannah-Jones, Nikole. 2019. “Our Democracy's Founding Ideals were False When They were Written. Black Americans Have Fought to Make Them True.” New York Times Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/14/magazine/black-history-american-democracy.html.Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, Robert, Johnson, Paul E., and Sprague, John. 2004. Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 2003. “How Solid is Mass Support for Democracy: And How Do We Measure It?” PS: Political Science and Politics 36 (1): 51–57.Google Scholar
Kingzette, Jon. 2020. “Civic Culture as a System of Democratic Norms: A Framework for Theoretical and Empirical Research.” Paper presented at the Ohio State Political Theory Workshop.Google Scholar
Kingzette, Jon, Druckman, James, Klar, Samara, Krupnikov, Yanna, Levendusky, Matthew, and Ryan, John Barry. 2020. “How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms.” Working paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 1997. “Voting Correctly.” American Political Science Review 91 (3): 585–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Robert, et al. 2019. “The Trump Presidency and American Democracy: A Historical and Comparative Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 17 (2): 470–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2012. It's Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided With the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Every day Talk in the Deliberative System.” In Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, ed. Macedo, Stephen. New York: Oxford University Press, 211–40.Google Scholar
McClosky, Herbert. 1964. “Consensus and Ideology in American Politics.” American Political Science Review 58 (2): 361–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57: 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 2006 [1859]. On Liberty. ed. Ryan, Alan. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Minozzi, William, et al. 2020. “The Incidental Punditt: Who Talks Politics with Whom, and Why?” American Journal of Political Science 64 (1): 135–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MIT Election, Data, and Science Lab. 2020. https://electionlab.mit.edu/research/voter-turnout.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neblo, M.A. 2009. “Meaning and Measurement: Reorienting the Race Politics Debate.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (3): 474–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neblo, Michael A. 2015. Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neblo, Michael A., Esterling, Kevin M., and Lazer, David MJ. 2018. Politics with the People: Building a Directly Representative Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1989. “The Civic Culture: A Philosophic Critique.” In Civic Culture Revisited, eds. Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 57–102.Google Scholar
Pérez, Efrén O. forthcoming in 2021. “(Mis)Calculations, Psychological Mechanisms, and the Future Politics of People of Color.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2020.37.Google Scholar
Price, Vincent, Cappella, Joseph N., and Nir, Lilach. 2002. “Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion?” Political Communication 19 (1): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1999. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense.” In Democracy's Value, eds. Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordón, Casiano. New York: Cambridge University Press, 23–55.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Quarcoo, Ashley. 2020. “Global Democracy Supporters Must Confront Systemic Racism.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/07/15/global-democracy-supporters-must-confront-systemic-racism-pub-82298.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Stephen J., and Mark Hansen, John. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schram, Sanford F., and Fording, Richard C.. forthcoming in 2021. “Racial Liberalism Resurgent: Connecting Multi-Racial Protests and Electoral Politics Today.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2020.40.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. 1942. Socialism, Capitalism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 2013. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Eighth ed. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco R., Bächtiger, André, Spörndli, Markus, and Steiner, Jürg. 2003. “Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index.” Comparative European Politics 1 (1): 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stouffer, Samuel Andrew. 1955. Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties: A Cross-Section of the Nation Speaks Its Mind. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar