Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:34:29.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When the workplace is the home: labour inspectors’ discretionary power in the field of domestic work – an institutional analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2019

Rebecca Paraciani  and
Roberto Rizza Open the ORCID record for Roberto Rizza [Opens in a new window]
Rebecca Paraciani
Affiliation:
University of Bologna, Italy
Roberto Rizza*
Affiliation:
University of Bologna, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article builds on previous studies concerning the question of street-level bureaucracy, an expression coined by Lipsky (1980) – Street-Level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (New York: Russel Sage Foundation) – to highlight the importance of the discretionary power that professionals in public agencies exercise during the implementation of laws, standards and guidelines. Discretion may depend on the need to compromise between the limited resources available and the claims of citizens, or between administrative policy directives and assessments, on the one hand, and their interpretation by “street-level” bureaucrats, on the other. This article focuses on the dilemmas that labour inspectors face when dealing with employment irregularities involving domestic workers. Based on nine months of observations in a local office of the Italian Labour Inspectorate, it aims to understand how labour inspectors make use of their discretionary power when the workplace is the home. This article connects studies of street-level bureaucracy with the new institutional organisational analysis, focusing on the isomorphic pressures from the institutional field in which the labour inspectors operate, together with the manner in which such pressures shape labour inspectors’ discretion. Through this connection, the article aims to extend the scope of both theories.

Keywords

domestic workersethnographyinstitutional fieldisomorphismlabour inspectorsstreet-level bureaucracy
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 1 - 16
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambrosini, M (2005) Sociologia delle migrazioni. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Andall, J (2000) Gender, Migration and Domestic Service. The Politics of Black Women in Italy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, B (2007) A Very Private Business. Exploring the Demand for Migrant Domestic Workers. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 14(3): 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, P (1978) The Study of Macro and Micro Implementation of Social Policy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Bettio, F, Simonazzi, A and Villa, P (2006) Change in Care Regimes and Female Migration: The ‘Care Drain’in the Mediterranean. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(3): 271–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonazzi, G (2002) Come studiare le organizzazioni. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Borghi, V and Rizza, R (2006) L’organizzazione sociale del lavoro. Lo statuto del lavoro e le sue trasformazioni. Milano: Mondadori.Google Scholar
Borghi, V and Van Berkel, R (2007) Individualised Service Provision in an Era of Activation and New Governance. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27(9/10): 413–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodkin, EZ and Marston, G (2013) Work and the Welfare State. Street-Level Organisation and Workfare Politics. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Castles, S and Miller, MJ (1993) The Age of Migration. International Population Movements in the Modem World. New York: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Caswell, D, Larsen, F, van Berkel, R and Kupka, P (2017) Conclusions and Topics for Future Research. In van Berkel, R, Caswell, D, Kupka, P and Larsen, F (eds.), Frontline Delivery of Welfare‐to‐Work Policies in Europe. Activating the Unemployed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Catanzaro, R and Colombo, A (2009) (eds.) Badanti & Co. Il lavoro domestico straniero in Italia. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Cooper, H (2001) Homework for All in Moderation. Educational Leadership, 58(7): 34–38.Google Scholar
Davis, KC (1969) Discretionary Justice. A Preliminary Inquiry. Louisiana: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P and Powell, W (1983) The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality In Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, CR (2009) Making Rights Real: Activists, Bureaucrats, and the Creation of the Legalistic State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, CR, Maynard‐Moody, S and Haider‐Markel, D (2017) Beyond Profiling: The Institutional Sources of Racial Disparities in Policing. Public Administration Review, 77(2): 168–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, T and Harris, J (2004) Street-level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 34(6): 871–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassin, D (2013) La forza dell’ordine. Antropologia della polizia nelle periferie urbane. Bologna: La Linea.Google Scholar
Ferrari, S (2002) Event marketing: i grandi eventi e gli eventi speciali come strumenti di marketing. Padova: Cedam.Google Scholar
Fineman, S (1998) Street-level Bureaucrats and the Social Construction of Environmental Control. Organization Studies, 19(6): 953–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flood, AB and Fennell, ML (1995) Through the Lenses of Organizational Sociology: The Role of Organizational Theory and Research in Conceptualizing and Examining Our Health Care System. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Extra Issue: 154–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FRA (2015) Severe Labour Exploitation: Workers Moving Within or Into the European Union. States’ Obligations and Victims’ Rights. Vienna: FRA.Google Scholar
Fullin, G and Vercelloni, V (2009) Dentro la trappola. Percezioni e immagini del lavoro domestico e di cura nei percorsi delle donne immigrate. Polis, 22(3): 427–462.Google Scholar
Garrow, EE and Grusky, O (2012) Institutional Logic and Street-Level Discretion: The Case of HIV Test Counseling. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1): 103–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C (1982) The Way we Think Now: Toward an Ethnography of Modern Thought. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 35: 14–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilboy, JA (1992) Penetrability of Administrative Systems: Political “Casework” and Immigration Inspections. Law & Society Review, 26(2): 273–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goosensen, H and Bueren, van E (2011) De professional versus de professionele organisatie: opvattingen over professioneel toezicht, Congres Toezicht en Wetenschap Vide & TU Delft 21-22 June 2011.Google Scholar
Goosensen, HR and Voort van der, HG (2009) Risk Based Oversight: the Story of Street-Level Inspectors. In nn (eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association. Denver: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Ham, C and Hill, M (1986) Introduzione all’analisi delle politiche pubbliche. il Mulino: Bologna.Google Scholar
Hawkins, K (1984) Environment and Enforcement. Regulation and the Social Definition of Pollution. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hupe, P (2013) Dimensions of Discretion: Specifying the Object of Street-Level Bureaucracy Research. Der Moderne Staat, 6: 425–440.Google Scholar
Hupe, P and Buffat, A (2014) A Public Service Gap: Capturing Contexts in a Comparative Approach of Street-Level Bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16(4): 548–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hupe, P and Hill, M (2007) Street-level Bureaucracy and Public Accountability. Public Administration, 85(2):279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hupe, P, Hill, M and Buffat, A (2015) (eds.) Understanding Street-Level Bureaucracy, Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazepov, Y and Barberis, E (2012) Social assistance governance in Europe. Towards a Multi-level Perspective. In Marx, I and Nelson, K (eds.), Minimum Income Protection in Flux, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kelly, M (1994) Theories of Justice and Street-Level Discretion Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 4(2): 119–140.Google Scholar
Kluin, MAH (2014) Optic Compliance: Enforcement and Compliance in the Dutch Chemical Industry, Delft: Ridderprint.Google Scholar
Lehmann Nielsen, V (2006) Are Street-Level Bureaucrats Compelled or Enticed to Cope? Public Administration, 84(4): 861–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsky, M (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Loyens, K (2016) Law Enforcement and Policy Alienation – Coping by Labour Inspectors and Federal Police Officers. In Hupe, P, Hill, M and Buffat, A (eds.), Understanding Street Level Bureaucracy. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
May, PJ and Wood, RS (2003) At the Regulatory Front Lines: Inspectors’ Enforcement Styles and Regulatory Compliance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2): 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard-Moody, S and Musheno, M (2003) Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, VL (2007) Differential Treatment and Communicative Interactions: Why the Character of Social Interaction is Important. Law and Policy, 29(2): 257–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piore, MJ (2011) Beyond Markets: Sociology, Street Level Bureaucracy and the Management of the Public Sector. Regulation & Governance, 5: 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piore, MJ and Schrank, A (2006) Trading Up: An Embryonic Model for Easing the Human Costs of Free Markets. Boston Review, 31(5): 11–14.Google Scholar
Piore, MJ and Schrank, A (2008) Toward Managed Flexibility: The Revival of Labour Inspection in the Latin World. International Labour Review, 147(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, M (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raaphorst, N and Loyens, K (2018) From Poker Games to Kitchen Tables: How Social Dynamics Affect Frontline Decision Making. Administration & Society. doi: 0095399718761651.Google Scholar
Rice, D (2012) Street-Level Bureaucrats and the Welfare State: Toward a Micro-Institutionalist Theory of Policy Implementation. Administration & Society, 45(9): 1038–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riccucci, N (2005) Street-Level Bureaucrat and Intrastate Variation in the Implementation of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Policies. Journal of Public Administration, 15: 89–111.Google Scholar
Sarti, R (2010) (eds.), Lavoro domestico e di cura. Quali diritti? Roma: Ediesse.Google Scholar
Saruis, T (2015) Gli operatori sociali nel nuovo welfare. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Thornton, PH and Ocasio, W (2017) Institutional Logics. In Greenwood, R, Oliver, C, Lawrence, TB and Meyer, RE (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wiering, M (1999) Contexten van handhaving bij de mestregelgeving in Nederland en Vlaanderen. In Bakker, W and van Waarden, F (eds.), Ruimte rond regels. Stijlen van regulering en beleidsuitvoering vergeleken. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar