Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T14:19:40.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Skeptical Reflections on a Europe of Regions: Britain, Germany, and the ERDF

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Jeffrey J. Anderson
Jeffrey J. Anderson
Affiliation:
Political Science, Brown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

European Community policymaking has been predicated upon the member governments acting as gatekeepers which mediate between their respective domestic political systems and EC institutions. However, the sweeping changes associated with Project 1992 threaten the gatekeeping status of the Twelve. This article explores the domestic and international consequences, which are cast in terms of three scenarios: the maintenance of the status quo, the emergence of a ‘Europe of Regions’, and a variegated set of outcomes. As an attempt to move beyond the realm of pure speculation, concrete lessons are culled from the reform of the European Regional Development Fund since 1979 and its effect on national and subnational interests in Britain and the Federal Republic of Germany. The theoretical premise is that national and subnational actors respond to Community initiatives within a structured context, the domestic policy networks in which they are embedded. These clusters of interorganizational relationships at the domestic level reflect the underlying distribution of resources among actors, and endow them with different capabilities and vulnerabilities as they seek to cope with changes administered to their policy environment by the EC. The findings suggest skepticism of the image of strengthened regions breaking out of the orbit of weakened states with the assistance of the EC. While the ability of member states to retain their roles as gatekeepers varies, this capacity remains strong. Moreover, subnational actors often view the EC as yet another exogenous institutional constraint on action.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , October 1990 , pp. 417 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. (1990) ‘When Market and Territory Collide: Thatcher and the Politics of Regional Decline,’ West European Politics 13: 234–257.Google Scholar
Armstrong, H.W. (1985) ‘The Reform of the European Community Regional Policy,’ Journal of Common Market Studies 23: 319–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer, S. and Paterson, W.. (1987) The Federal Republic of Germany and the European Community. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities. (1980–1990) European Regional Development Fund: Annual Reports. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities. (1989) XXllnd General Report on the Activities of the European Communities 1988. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities. (1990) XXIIIrd General Report on the Activities of the European Communities 1989. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher. (1990) Neunzehnter Rahmenplan der Gemeinschaftsaufgabe ‘Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaftsstruktur (Drucksache 11/7501). Bonn: Bonner Universitats-Buchdruckerei.Google Scholar
Esser, J. and Väth, W.. (1987) ‘Overcoming the Steel Crisis in the Federal Republic of Germany 1974–1983.’ In Mény, Y. and Wright, V., eds., The Politics of Steel. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ewringmann, D. et al. (1986) Die Gemeinschaftsaufgabe ‘Verbesserung der regionalen Wirtschaflsslruktur’ under veränderten Rahmenbedingungen. Berlin: Ducker & Humbolt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunlicks, A. (1986) Local Government in the German Federal System. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, E.(1975) The Obsolescence of Regional Integration Theory. Berkeley: Research Studies 25, Institute of International Studies, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Haggard, S. and Moon, C. (1990) ‘Institutions and Economic Policy: Theory and a Korean Case Study,’ World Politics 42: 210–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, S. (1966) ‘Obstinate or Obsolete: The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe,’ Daedalus 95: 862–915.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. G. (1981) ‘Iron Triangles, Woolly Corporatism, and Elastic Nets: Images of the Policy Process’, Journal of Public Policy 1: 95–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, M. (forthcoming) ‘The Continental Meso: Regions in the European Community’. In Sharpe, L. J., ed., Between Centre and Periphery: Meso-Government in Europe. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Keating, M.. and Rhodes, M.. (1982) ‘The Status of Regional Government: an Analysis of the West Midlands’. In Hogwood, B. and Keating, M., eds., Regional Government in England. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Marks, G. (forthcoming) ‘Structural Policy and 1992.’ In Sbragia, A., ed., European Political Institutions and Policymaking after 1992. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Mawson, J. et al. (1985) ‘The Development of the European Community Regional Policy’. In Keating, M. and Jones, B., eds., Regions in the European Community. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A. (1991) ‘Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community,’ International Organization 45: 19–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevin, E. (1990) The Economics of Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, E. (1987) ‘Taking the State Seriously’. In Weiner, Myron and Hundngton, Samuel, eds.,Understanding Political Development. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.Google Scholar
Parsons, D. W. (1986) The Political Economy of British Regional Policy. London: Croom Helm Publishers.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (1988) ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games,’ International Organization 42: 427–460.Google Scholar
Reissert, B. und Schnabel, F.. (1976) ‘Fallstudien zum Planungs-and Finanzierungsverbund von Bund, Ländern, Gemeinden.’ In Scharpf, F. et al. , Politikverflechtung. Kronberg/Ts.: Scriptor Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1988) Beyond Westminster and Whitehall: The Sub-central Governments of Britain.London: Unwin Hyman Ltd.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1987) ‘Territorial Politics in the United Kingdom’, West European Politics 10: 21–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, D. (1990) ‘Competition Policy’. In Hufbauer, G., ed., Europe 1992. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1990.Google Scholar
Sharpe, L.J. (1985) ‘Central Coordination and the Policy Network’, Political Studies 33: 361–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, L. J. (1985) ‘Fragmentation and Territoriality in the European State System’, International Political Science Review 10: 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P. (1983) The Limits of European Integration. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Vanhove, N.. and Klaassen, L.. (1987) Regional Policy: A European Approach. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Company Ltd.Google Scholar
Wallace, H. (1983) ‘Distributional Politics: Dividing up the Community Cake’. In Wallace, H. et al. Policymaking in the European Community. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Wallace, W. (1982) ‘Europe as a Confederation,’ Journal of Common Market Studies 20: 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, C. (1983) ‘Theoretical Perspectives and Problems.’ In Wallace, H. et al. Policymaking in the European Community. New York: John Wiley &Sons.Google Scholar
Wilks, S. and Wright, M.. (1987) ‘Conclusion: Comparing Government-Industry Relations: States,Sectors, and Networks’. In Wilks, S. and Wright, M., eds., Comparative Government-Industry Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar