Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:06:39.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Risk, Regulation and Crisis: Comparing National Responses in Food Safety Regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2011

Martin Lodge
Martin Lodge*
Affiliation:
Department of Government, London School of Economics
*
Martin Lodge Department of Government & Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation London School of Economics Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The literature on risk regulation often assumes a direct link between public pressure and regulatory responses. This article investigates whether the direction of regulatory response is related to public argumentation as expressed in the national print media. Three approaches are explored: national policy patterns, political panics expressed in Pavlovian politics, and policy responses shaped by universal policy paradigms. It assesses these three approaches in comparative perspective by looking at scandals in food safety regulation in Denmark, Germany and the US, looking at argumentation patterns in the national print media and using a coding system derived from grid-group cultural theory and regulatory responses. While all three countries display mostly hierarchical argumentation patterns, their actual regulatory responses point to diverse patterns.

Keywords

risk regulationcultural theoryfood safetycrisis
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , 23 February 2011 , pp. 25 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

6 , Perri (2004) Joined-up government in the western world in comparative perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14(1): 103–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, J., Hald, T., Nielsen, N., Sporon Fiedler, C.Noerrung, B. (2007) New strategies for the use of microbiological examinations in the food control in Denmark. Food Control 18: 273–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, C.Vogel, D. (eds.) (2006) What's the beef? Contested governance of European food safety. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boin, A., t'Hart, P., Stern, E.Sundelius, B. (2005) The Politics of Crisis Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. (2005) The emergence of risk based regulation and the new public management in the UK. Public Law Autumn: 512–549.Google Scholar
Breyer, S. (1993) Breaking the vicious circle. Cambridge/Mas: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chong, D.Druckman, J. (2007) Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coglianese, C.Lazer, D. (2003) Management-Based Regulation: Prescribing Private Management to Achieve Public Goals. Law and Society Review 37: 691–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deVreese, C. H.Semetko, H. (2001) Framing politics at the launch of the Euro. Political Communication 18: 107–122.Google Scholar
Dake, K. (1991) Orienting Dispositions in the Perception of Risk. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 22: 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, M. (1992) Risk and Blame. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, G. P. (1985) National Styles and Policy Styles. Journal of Public Policy 5(4): 467–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garth, B.Dezelay, Y. (1995) Merchants of Law as Moral Entrepreneurs. Law & Society Review 29: 27–64.Google Scholar
Gormley, W.Peters, B. G. (1992) National styles of regulation. Policy Sciences 25(4): 381–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, W. (2000) Econometric Analysis. London: PrenticeHall.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1991) Cultures and Organizations: Softwares of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hood, C. (1996) Control over Bureaucracy. Journal of Public Policy 15(3): 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C. (1998) The Art of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hood, C., Rothstein, H.Baldwin, R. (2001) The Government of Risk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C., James, O., Peters, G. B.Scott, C. (2004) Controlling Modern Government. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, C.Lodge, M. (2005) Pavlovian innovation, pet solutions and economizing on rationality? Politicians and dangerous dogs. In Black J., Lodge M. and Thatcher M. (eds.), Regulatory Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hood, C., Scott, C., James, O., Jones, G.Travers, T. (1999) Regulation Inside Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppe, R. (2007) Applied Cultural Theory. In Fischer F., Miller G. and Sidney M. (eds.), Handbook of Public Policy Analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Howlett, M. (2000) Beyond Legalism? Policy Ideas, Implementation Styles and Emulation-based Convergence in Canadian and US Environmental Policy. Journal of Public Policy 20: 305–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jann, W. (1983) Staatliche Programme und Verwaltungskultur. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, R. (2007) Globalization and legal change: the ‘Americanization’ of European law? Regulation & Governance 1: 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, R. (2001) Adversarial legalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, R. (2000) Introduction: Comparing national styles of regulation in Japan and the United States. Law & Policy 22(3/4): 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, R. D. (2006) Suing for Europe. Comparative Political Studies 39(1): 101–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelman, S. (1981) Regulating America, Regulating Sweden: a comparative study of occupational safety and health policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. (1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Kollman, K.Prakash, A. (2001) Green by choice? Cross-National Variations in Firms’ Responses to EMS-Based Environmental Regimes. World Politics 53(3): 399–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1997) American Exceptionalism. New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar
Lodge, M.Wegrich, K. (2011) Governance as contested logics of control. Journal of European Public Policy 18(1): 90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, M., Wegrich, K.McElroy, G. (2010) Gammelfleisch everywhere? Public Administration 88(1): 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löfstedt, R.Vogel, D. (2002) The changing character of regulation. Risk Analysis 21(3): 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, S. (2003) Representative Government and Special Interest Politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(3): 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lütz, S. (2004) Convergence within national diversity. Journal of Public Policy 24: 169–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundqvist, L. (1980) The Hare and the Tortoise: clean air policy in the United States and Sweden. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (1997) From the positive to the regulatory state. Journal of Public Policy 17: 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. (1994) The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe. West European Politics 14(3): 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, A. (2009) American Generation of Environmental Warnings. Human Ecology Review 16(1): 17–26.Google Scholar
Power, M. (2007) Organized Uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardon, J., Gustafsson, G.Jordan, G. (1982) The Concept of Policy Style. In Richardson J. (ed.), (1982) Policy Styles in Europe. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Simon, A.Xenos, M. (2000) Media Framing and Effective Public Deliberation. Political Communication 17(4): 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjöberg, L. (1998) Worldviews, Political Attitudes and Risk Perception. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment 9: 137–152.Google Scholar
Skogstadt, G. (2006) Regulating Food Safety Risks in the European Union. In Ansell C. and Vogel D. (eds.), What's the Beef. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Swedlow, B. (2002) Toward cultural analysis in policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 4(3): 267–285.Google Scholar
Swedlow, B., Kall, D., Zhou, Z., Hammitt, J. K.Wiener, J. B. (2009) Theorizing and Generalizing about Risk Assessment and Regulation through Comparative Nested Analysis of Representative Cases. Law & Policy 1–34.Google Scholar
Thompson, M., Ellis, R.Wildavky, A. (1990) Cultural Theory. Boulder, Col: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, M., Verweij, M.Ellis, R. (2006) Why and how culture matters. In Goodin R. and Tilly C. (eds.), Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verweij, M., Douglas, M., Ellis, R., Engel, C., Hendricks, F., Lohmann, S., Ney, S., Rayner, S.Thompson, M. (2006) The Case for Clumsiness. In Verweij M. and Thompson M. (eds.), (2006) Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, D. (2003) The Hare and tortoise revisited: the new politics of consumer and environmental regulation in Europe. British Journal of Political Science 33: 557–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, D. (1986) National Styles of Regulation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weible, C.Sabatier, P. (2009) Themes and Variations: Taking Stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Policy Studies Journal 37(1): 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, J. B. (2003) Whose precaution after all? Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 13: 207–262.Google Scholar
Wiener, J. B.Rodgers, M. D. (2002) Comparing precaution in the United States and Europe. Journal of Risk Research 5(4): 317–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, C. (1995) The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending. American Journal of Political Science 39(4): 981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar