Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-nqxm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-17T16:20:58.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The political economy of budget trade-offs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2018

Christopher Adolph ,
Christian Breunig Open the ORCID record for Christian Breunig [Opens in a new window]  and
Chris Koski
Christopher Adolph
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences, University of Washington, USA
Christian Breunig*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Public Administration, University of Konstanz, Germany
Chris Koski
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Reed College, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Because the American states operate under balanced budget requirements, increases in spending in one area typically entail equal and opposite budget cuts in other programs. The literature analysing the correlates of government spending by policy area has mostly ignored these trade-offs inherent to policymaking, failing to address one of the most politically interesting and important dimensions of fiscal policy. Borrowing from the statistical literature on compositional data, we present more appropriate and efficient methods that explicitly incorporate the budget constraint into models of spending by budget category. We apply these methods to eight categories of spending from the American states over the years 1984–2009 to reveal winners and losers in the scramble for government spending. Our findings show that partisan governments finance their distinct priorities by raiding spending items that the opposition prefers, while different political institutions, economic conditions and state demographics impose different trade-offs across the budget.

Keywords

budgetingcompositional datapolitical partiesUnited States
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 25 - 50
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

Previous versions of this paper were presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association and the Midwest Political Science Association, as well as at the Conference on Political Competition and Government Policy at Duke University. We thank Jim Alt, Herbert Kitschelt, Michael New and the anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions.

References

Adolph, C (2013) Bankers, Bureaucrats, and Central Bank Politics: The Myth of Neutrality. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adolph, C, Quince, V Prakash, A (2017) The Shanghai Effect: Do Exports to China Affect Labor Rights in Africa? World Development 89(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitchison, J (1986) The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, JE Lowry, RC (1994) Divided Government, Fiscal Institutions, and Budget Deficits: Evidence from the States. American Political Science Review 88(4): 811–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, JE Lowry, RC (2000) A Dynamic Model of State Budget Outcomes under Divided Partisan Government. The Journal of Politics 62(4): 1035–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S Harbridge, L (2010) Incrementalism in Appropriations: Small Aggregation, Big Changes. Public Administration Review 70(3): 464–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, BW (2010) From the Ballot to the Blackboard: The Redistributive Political Economy of Education. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrilleaux, C (2000) “Party Strength, Party Change and Policy-Making in the American States.” Party Politics 6(1): 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrilleaux, CJ Berkman, M (2003) Do Governors Matter? Budget Rules and the Politics of State Policymaking. Political Research Quarterly 56(4): 409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrilleaux, C, Holbrook, T Langer, L (2002) Electoral Competition, Legislative Balance, and American Welfare State Policy. American Journal of Political Science 46(2): 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, FR Jones, BD (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, TC Goodman, RP (1973) Private Demands for Public Goods. American Economic Review 63(3): 280–296.Google Scholar
Berry, WD Lowery, D (1990) An Alternative Approach to Understanding Budgetary Trade-offs. American Journal of Political Science 34(3): 671–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyle, T (1996) Governors: The Middleman and Women in Our Political System. In Gray Virginia and Jacob Herbert (eds.), Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis, 6th ed. Boston: Little Brown, 207–252.Google Scholar
Boehmke, FJ Skinner, P (2012) State Policy Innovativeness Revisited. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 12(3): 303–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borcherding, TE Deacon, RT (1972) The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments. American Economic Review 62(5): 891–901.Google Scholar
Brandt, PT, Monroe, BL Williams, JT (1999) Time Series Models for Compositional Data. Bloomington: Department of Political Science. Indiana University.Google Scholar
Breunig, C Busemeyer, MR (2012) Fiscal Austerity and the Trade-off Between Public Investment and Social Spending. Journal of European Public Policy 19(6): 921–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, RD (1995) Party Cleavages and Welfare Effort in the American States. American Political Science Review 89(1): 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busemeyer, MR (2014) Skills and Inequality: Partisan Politics and the Political Economy of Education Reforms in Western Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busemeyer, MR, Goerres, A Weschle, S (2009) Attitudes Towards Redistributive Spending in an Era of Demographic Ageing: The Rival Pressures from Age and Income in 14 OECD Countries. Journal of European Social Policy 19(3): 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D (1978) The Expansion of the Public Economy. American Political Science Review 72(4): 1243–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dye, TR (1984) Party and Policy in the States. Journal of Politics 46(4): 1097–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatás, A Mihov, I (2006) The Macroeconomic Effects of Fiscal Rules in the US States. Journal of Public Economics 90(1–2): 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garritzmann, JL (2017) The Partisan Politics of Higher Education. PS: Political Science & Politics 50(2): 413–417.Google Scholar
Gilligan, TW Matsusaka, JG (2001) Fiscal Policy, Legislature Size, and Political Parties: Evidence from the First Half of the Twentieth Century. National Tax Journal 54, 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, V, Hanson, RL Kousser, T (2012) Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis. Washington DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C Mortensen, PB (2015) Avoidance and Engagement: Issue Competition in Multiparty Systems. Political Studies 63(4): 747–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunwald, GK, Raftery, AE Guttorp, P (1993) Time Series of Continuous Proportions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 55(1): 103–116.Google Scholar
Hendrick, RM Garand, JC (1991) Expenditure Tradeoffs in the US States: A Pooled Analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 1(3): 295–318.Google Scholar
Hoover, GA Pecorino, P (2005) “The Political Determinants of Federal Expenditure at the State Level.” Public Choice.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husted, TA Kenny, LA (1997) The Effect of the Expansion of the Voting Franchise on the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy 105, 54–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Im, KS, Pesaran, MH Shin, Y (2003) Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics 115, 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, D Jackson, AL (2010) On the Politics of Imprisonments: A Review of Systematic Findings. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6, 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, JW (1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd ed. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.Google Scholar
Kousser, T (2002) The Politics of Discretionary Medicaid Spending, 1980–1993. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 27(4): 639–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kousser, T Phillips, JH (2012) The Power of American Governors: Winning on Budgets and Losing on Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, GA Melusky, BF (2012) Concentrated Powers: Unilateral Executive Authority and Fiscal Policymaking in the American States. The Journal of Politics 74(01): 98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnikov, Y Shipan, C (2012) Measuring Gubernatorial Budgetary Power: A New Approach. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 12(4): 438–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantz, P, Alexander, J, Adolph, C Montgomery, JL (2014) State Government Organization of Health Services, 1990-2009: Correlates and Consequences. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice 20(2): 160–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larrosa, JMC (2005) “Compositional Time Series: Past and Present.” https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpem/0510002.html. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Lauth, TP Reese, CC (2006) The Line-Item Veto in Georgia: Fiscal Restraint or Inter-Branch Politics? Public Budgeting & Finance 26(2): 1–19.Google Scholar
Lewis, DC, Schneider, SK Jacoby, WG (2015) Institutional Characteristics and State Policy Priorities: The Impact of Legislatures and Governors. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 15(4): 447–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsmeyer, CS, Philips, AQ, Rutherford, A Whitten, GD (forthcoming) Comparing Dynamic Pies: A Strategy for Modeling Compositional Variables in Time and Space. Political Science Research and Methods, 1–18.Google Scholar
Meguid, BM (2005) Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success. American Political Science Review 99(3): 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morehouse, SM Jewell, ME (2004) States as Laboratories: A Reprise. Annual Review of Political Science 7, 177–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natchez, PB Bupp, IC (1973) Policy and Priority in the Budgetary Process. American Political Science Review 67(3): 951–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson-Crotty, S, Theobald, NA Wood, BD (2006) Fiscal Federalism and Budgetary Tradeoffs in the American States. Political Research Quarterly 59(2): 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philips, AQ, Rutherford, A Whitten, GD (2016) Dynamic Pie: A Strategy for Modeling Trade Offs in Compositional Variables over Time. American Journal of Political Science 60(1): 268–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P (1995) Dismantling the Welfare State?: Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poterba, JM (1996) Budget Institutions and Fiscal Policy in the U.S. States. American Economic Review 86(2): 395–400.Google Scholar
Primo, DM (2006) Stop Us Before We Spend Again: Institutional Constraints on US State Spending. Economics and Politics 18(3): 269–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravishanker, N, Dey, DK Iyengar, N (2004) “Compositional Time Series of Mortality Proportions.” Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Rose, S (2008) The Political Manipulation of US State Rainy Day Funds under Rules Versus Discretion. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 8(2): 150–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, I (1997) The Politics of Public Budgeting: Getting and Spending, Borrowing, and Balancing, 3rd ed. Chatham, New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Ryu, JE (2011) Legislative Professionalism and Budget Punctuations in State Government Sub-Functional Expenditures. Public Budgeting & Finance 31(2): 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryu, JE (2015) The Public Budgeting and Finance Primer: Key Concepts in Fiscal Choice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigelman, L Buell, EH Jr (2004) Avoidance or Engagement? Issue Convergence in U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1960–2000. American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 650–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, DL Hou, Y (2013) Balanced Budget Requirements and State Spending: A Long–Panel Study. Public Budgeting & Finance 33(2): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, TMF Brundson, TM (1989) “The Time Series Analysis of Compositional Data.” http://www.amstat.org/Sections/Srms/Proceedings/papers/1989_004.pdf. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
Su, T-T, Kamlet, MS. Mowery, DC (1993) Modeling U.S. Budgetary and Fiscal Policy Outcomes: A Disaggregated Systemwide Perspective. American Journal of Political Science 37(1): 213–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, RU (2015) Perverse Politics: The Persistence of Mass Imprisonment in the Twenty-first Century. Perspectives on Politics 13(3): 618–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurmaier, KM Willoughby, KG (2001) Policy and Politics in State Budgeting. London: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Weingast, BR, Shepsle, KA Johnsen, C (1981) The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics. Journal of Political Economy 89(4): 642–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilensky, H (1975) The Welfare State and Equality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zellner, A (1962) An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 57, 348–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Adolph et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/RXMV9W
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Adolph et al. supplementary material

Adolph et al. supplementary material
Download Adolph et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 710.5 KB