Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:00:23.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Income Security Policies in the United States: The Inevitability and Consequences of Retrenchment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

John L. Palmer
Affiliation:
Public Policy, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC

Abstract

During the 1960s and early 1970s, strong economic growth and highly expansionary income security policies led to considerable progress for the entire American population with respect to major income security goals. However, in the last fifteen years much of this progress has been either arrested or reversed, particularly for the non-aged, as economic growth slowed and income security policies ceased to expand and, in some cases, contracted. This retrenchment was the inevitable consequence of numerous phenomena which preceded, and were reinforced by the Reagan era. American income security policies are not likely to contract generally in the future, nor to resume expanding in a direction characteristic of many Western European welfare states. Rather, the prospects are for slow economic growth, higher targetting of programs by income in some areas, and marginal expansions requiring minimal new commitments of public resources in others. Major income security problems, especially among the lower income population, will remain.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, E. (1985) The Changing Profile of Pensions in America, Washington: Employee Benefits Research Institute.Google Scholar
Bawden, D. L. and Palmer, J. (1984) Social Policy: Challenging the Welfare State. In Palmer, J. and Sawhill, I. (eds.), The Reagan Record: An Assessment of America's Changing Domestic Priorities. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Congressional Budget Office (1978) ‘Federal Housing Policy: Current Programs and Recurrent Issues’, Background Paper, Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Danziger, S., Gottschalk, P. and Smolensky, E. (1985) The Effects of Unemployment and Policy Changes on America's Poor, Journal of Social Policy, 14 (Part 3),07.Google Scholar
Danziger, S., Haveman, R., and Plotnick, R. (1981) How Income Transfer Programs Affect Work, Saving, and the Income Distribution: A Critical Review, The Journal of Economic Literature, XIX, 09, 9751028.Google Scholar
Gillion, C. (1987) Social Security, Employment and Income Support in OECD Countries: Developments Since the Mid-1970s. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (processed).Google Scholar
Gottschalk, P. and Danziger, S. (1984) Macroeconomic Conditions, Income Transfers, and the Trend in Poverty. In Bawden, D. L. (ed.), The Social Contract Revisited: Aims and Outcomes of President on the Reagan's Social Welfare Policy. Washington: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Heclo, H. (1986) ‘Reaganism and the Search for a Public Philosophy,’ In Palmer, J. (ed.), Perspectives on the Reagan Years, Washington: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Irby, I. (1986) Attaining the Housing Goal? Washington: Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Economic Affairs, (processed).Google Scholar
Levy, F. and Michael, R. (1986) An Economic Bust for the Baby Boom, Challenge, 29(1), 0304.Google Scholar
Newman, S. and Struyk, R. (1983) Housing and Poverty, Review of Economics and Statistics, 65(2), 05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, J. (1987) The Changing Structure of the Deficit, The National Tax Journal, Volume XXXIX(3), 1987.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. and Gould, S. (1986) The Economic Consequences of Population Aging, Daedalus, 115(1), Winter.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. (1986) Philosophy, Policy, and Politics: Integrating Themes. In Palmer, J. (ed.), Perspectives on the Reagan Years, Washington: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Pechman, J. (1985) Who Paid the Taxes, 1065–85. Washington: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Physician Task Force on Hunger in America (1985) Hunger in America: The Growing Epidemic, cambridge: Harvard University School of Public Health.Google Scholar
Plotnick, R. (1984) The Redistributive Impact of Cash Transfers, Public Finance Quarterly, 12(1),01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R. (1985) How Exceptional is American Government? Glasgow, Scotland: Strathclyde. Studies in Public Policy Number 150.Google Scholar
Smeeding, T. (1982) Alternative Methods for Valuing Selected In-Kind Transfer Benefits and Measuring their Effects on Poverty. Bureau of the Census Technical Paper 50. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
US General Accounting Office (1985) Homelessness: A Complex Problem and the Federal Response, Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Urban Institute (1985) The Effects of Legislative Changes in 1981 and 1982 on the Food Stamp Program, Volume I. Washington: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Vroman, W. (1980) State Replacement Rates in 1980. In Unemployment Compensation: Studies and Research Volume 1. WashingtonNational Commission on Unemployment Compensation.Google Scholar
Vroman, W. (1985) The Aggregate Performance of Unemployment Insurance, Washington: The Urban Institute (processed).Google Scholar