Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:32:42.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining styles of political judgement in British government: comparing isolation dynamics (1959–1974)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2015

Perri Six
Perri Six*
Affiliation:
School of Business and Management, Queen Mary University of London, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During their time in office, British governments’ styles of political judgement or bias in policymaking often become shorter in term and less intellectually coherent, sometimes in passive or coping ways, sometimes shifting toward imposition. This article offers an explanation, developing the neo-Durkheimian theory of institutional dynamics. Changing judgement style, it argues, is driven by changes in administrations’ informal institutional ordering of social organisation. “Isolation dynamics” are shifts in that ordering towards weakly cohesive but strongly constrained “isolate” forms. Increased isolate ordering is reflected in less cohesive but more constrained judgement style. Novel distinctions within isolate ordering explain key differences among administrations’ trajectories. Using extensive archival data, three British administrations between 1959 and 1974 are compared. The study finds that, among otherwise contrasting administrations, reinforcement or undermining in informal social organisation drove changes in styles of political judgement, as shown in their ways of framing policy problems, risks, time horizons, etc.

Keywords

informal institutionsisolation dynamicspolitical judgementstructural despotismthought style
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 219 - 250
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Six, P. (2003) Institutional viability; a neo-Durkheimian theory. Innovation: the European journal of social science research 16(4): 395–416.Google Scholar
Six, P. (2004) E-Governance: Styles of Political Judgement in the Information Age Polity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Six, P. (2011) Explaining Political Judgement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Six, P. (2013) Anomalies, Political Judgement and Change in Informal Institutions in Government, Paper Presented at the Political Studies Association Conference, Cardiff, 25–27 March.Google Scholar
Six, P. (2014a) Explaining Decision-Making in Government: The Neo-Durkheimian Institutional Framework. Public Administration 92(1): 87–103.Google Scholar
Six, P. (2014b) Explaining Unintended and Unexpected Consequences of Policy Decisions: Comparing Three British Governments, 1959–74. Public Administration 92(3): 673–691.Google Scholar
Six, P. (forthcoming a) Making and Breaking Styles of Political Judgement: Explaining Informal Institutions and Thought Style in British Government, submitted.Google Scholar
Six, P. (forthcoming b) Quiet Unintended Transitions? A Neo-Durkheimian Explanation of Puzzling Institutional Change.Google Scholar
Six, P. (2015) If Governance is Everything, Maybe it’s Nothing. In Massey, A. and Miller, K. (eds.), The International Handbook of Public Administration and Governance . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 56–80.Google Scholar
Six, P. and Mars, G. (eds.) (2008) The Institutional Dynamics of Culture: The New Durkheimians vols I and II. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Six, P., Goodwin, N., Peck, E. and Freeman, T. (2006) Managing Networks of Twenty First Century Organisations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bale, T. (1999) Sacred Cows and Common Sense: The Symbolic Statecraft and Political Culture of the British Labour Party. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Beach, D. and Pedersen, R. B. (2013) Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Busch, P. (2003) All the Way with JFK? Britain, the US and the Vietnam War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. J. (1994) The Theory that Would be King. In Coyle D. J. and Ellis R. J. (eds.), Politics, Policy and Culture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 219–240.Google Scholar
Coyle, D. J. and Ellis, R. J. (eds.) (1994) Politics, Policy and Culture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1970) Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1982) Cultural Bias. In Douglas M. (ed.), In the Active Voice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 183–254.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1986) How Institutions Think. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. (1980 [1966]) Homo hierarchicus: the caste system and its implications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É. (1951 [1897]) Suicide: A Study in Sociology. Translated by Spaulding J. A. and Simpson G. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É. (1961 [1925]) Moral education: a study in the theory and application of the sociology of education, tr Wilson EK and Schnurer H. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É. (1984) The division of labour in society, tr Halls WD. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É. and Mauss, M. (1963 [1902–1903]) Primitive Classification. Translated by Needham R. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fields, K. (1995) Translator’s Introduction: Religion as an Eminently Social Thing. In Durkheim, É. (ed.), The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by Fields K. New York: Free Press, xvii–lxxiii.Google Scholar
Fleck, L. (1979) Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Translated by Bradley F. and Trenn T. J. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garnett, M. and Aitken, A. (2002) Splendid! Splendid! The Authorised Biography of Willie Whitelaw. London: Politico’s.Google Scholar
Grendstad, G. and Selle, P. (1995) Cultural Theory and the New Institutionalism. Journal of Theoretical Politics 7(1): 5–27.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (2002) Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hood, C. C. (1996) Where Extremes Meet: ‘SPRAT’ Meets ‘SHARK’ in Public Risk Management. In Hood C. C. and Jones D. K. C. (eds.), Accident and Design: Contemporary Debates in Risk Management. London: UCL Press, 208–228.Google Scholar
Hood, C. (1998) The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric and Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, A. (1987) RAB: The Life of R.A. Butler. London: Jonathan Cape, 288–294.Google Scholar
Hurd, D. (1979) An End to Promises: Sketch of a Government, 1970–74. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (1977) Progress and its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lodge, M., Wegrich, K. and McElroy, G. (2010) Dodgy Kebabs Everywhere? Variety of Worldviews and Regulatory Change. Public Administration 88(1): 247–266.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. Enlgd ed. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Moran, M. (1977) The Politics of Industrial Relations: The Origins, Life and Death of the 1971 Industrial Relations Act. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
O’Hara, G. (2004) ‘Intractable, obscure and baffling’: The Incomes Policy of the Conservative Government, 1957–64. Contemporary British History 18(1): 25–53.Google Scholar
Rayner, S. (1982) The Perception of Time and Space in Egalitarian Sects: A Millenarian Cosmology. In Douglas M. (ed.), Essays in the Sociology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 247–274.Google Scholar
Rayner, S. (1986) The Politics of Schism: Routinisation and Social Control in the International Socialists/Socialist Workers’ Party. In Law J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: a New Sociology of Knowledge?. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 46–67.Google Scholar
Rayner, S. (1988) The rules that keep us equal: complexity and the costs of egalitarian organisation. In Flanagan J.G. and Rayner S. (eds.), Rules, decisions and inequality in egalitarian societies. Aldershot: Avebury, 20–42.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. and Dunleavy, P. (eds.) (1995) Prime Minister, Cabinet and Core Executive. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. (1992) The Dynamics of Cultural Theory and their Implications for the Enterprise Culture. In Heap S. H. and Ross A. (eds.), Understanding the Enterprise Culture: Themes in the Work of Mary Douglas. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 182–202.Google Scholar
Thompson, M., Ellis, R. J. and Wildavsky, A. (1990) Cultural Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, M. and Rayner, S. (1998) Risk and Governance Part I: The Discourses of Climate Change. Government and Opposition 33(2): 139–166.Google Scholar
Thompson, M., Rayner, S. and Ney, S. (1998) Risk and Governance Part II: Policy in a Complex and Plurally Perceived World. Government and Opposition 33(3): 330–354.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. (1998) Culture and Social Theory. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
Ziegler, P. (2010) Edward Heath: The Authorised Biography. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar