Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Ágh, Attila
2001.
Early consolidation and performance crisis: The Majoritarian‐consensus democracy debate in hungary.
West European Politics,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 3,
p.
89.
Howlett, Michael
2002.
Understanding National Administrative Styles and Their Impact Upon Administrative Reform: A Neo-Institutional Model and Analysis.
Policy and Society,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Lodge, Martin
2003.
Institutional Choice and Policy Transfer: Reforming British and German Railway Regulation.
Governance,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 2,
p.
159.
Barzelay, Michael
and
Füchtner, Natascha
2003.
Explaining public management policy change: Germany in comparative perspective.
Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 1,
p.
7.
Christensen, Tom
and
LÆGreid, Per
2003.
Coping with Complex Leadership Roles: The Problematic Redefinition of Government‐owned Enterprises.
Public Administration,
Vol. 81,
Issue. 4,
p.
803.
James, Oliver
and
Lodge, Martin
2003.
The Limitations of ‘Policy Transfer’ and ‘Lesson Drawing’ for Public Policy Research.
Political Studies Review,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 2,
p.
179.
Della Rocca, Giuseppe
2003.
Burocrazie e declino della burocrazia.
Quaderni di Sociologia,
p.
137.
Hajnal, György
2004.
Cultural determinants of New Public Management reforms: A comparative study.
Society and Economy,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 2,
p.
223.
Painter, Martin
2004.
The Politics of Administrative Reform in East and Southeast Asia: From Gridlock to Continuous Self‐Improvement?.
Governance,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 3,
p.
361.
Hajnal, György
2005.
The spirit of management reforms.
Public Management Review,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 4,
p.
495.
Major, Claudia
2005.
Europeanisation and Foreign and Security Policy – Undermining or Rescuing the Nation State?.
Politics,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 3,
p.
175.
Nørgaard, Ole
and
Møller, Luise Pape
2005.
Who said politicians cannot be conservativeŒ Comparing reform capacity in the Czech and Hungarian telecom administrations.
Communist and Post-Communist Studies,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 3,
p.
403.
Painter, Martin
2005.
Transforming the Administrative State: Reform in Hong Kong and the Future of the Developmental State.
Public Administration Review,
Vol. 65,
Issue. 3,
p.
335.
SAGER, FRITZ
2005.
Metropolitan Institutions and Policy Coordination: The Integration of Land Use and Transport Policies in Swiss Urban Areas.
Governance,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 2,
p.
227.
Hood, Christopher
and
Lodge, Martin
2005.
Aesop With Variations: Civil Service Competency as A Case of German Tortoise and British Hare?.
Public Administration,
Vol. 83,
Issue. 4,
p.
805.
Knill, Christoph
2005.
Challenges to State Policy Capacity.
p.
52.
Painter, Martin
2006.
Thaksinisation or managerialism? Reforming the Thai bureaucracy.
Journal of Contemporary Asia,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 1,
p.
26.
Vandenabeele, Wouter
Scheepers, Sarah
and
Hondeghem, Annie
2006.
Public Service Motivation in an International Comparative Perspective: The UK and Germany.
Public Policy and Administration,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 1,
p.
13.
BARZELAY, MICHAEL
and
GALLEGO, RAQUEL
2006.
From “New Institutionalism” to “Institutional Processualism”: Advancing Knowledge about Public Management Policy Change.
Governance,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 4,
p.
531.
Sager, Fritz
2006.
Policy coordination in the European metropolis: A meta-analysis.
West European Politics,
Vol. 29,
Issue. 3,
p.
433.