Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:30:10.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Determinants of Taxation in Britain: An Empirical Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Terence Karran
Terence Karran
Affiliation:
Applied Economics, Leeds Polytechnic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of political and macroeconomic influences in determining the principal taxes in the United Kingdom since 1948 are examined here. Basic models of tax determination – policy initiative, macroeconomic determination and consumer preference – are tested. Causal path analysis is used to answer the question: Which is more important in determining tax revenues: the policy initiatives of governments, or circumstances in the economy which in the short term may be outside governmental control? The results demonstrate that for most taxes policy initiatives to alter tax rates and bases are much less important to revenue yield than underlying trends in the economy. The continuing strength of these macroeconomic secular trends circumscribes attempts by British policymakers to depart radically from the existing pattern of taxation.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , August 1985 , pp. 365 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allan, C. M., 1971. The Theory of Taxation. (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Alt, J. E., 1980. Political Business Cycles in Britain, In Whiteley, P., ed., Models of Political Economy. (London: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
Blalock, H., 1971. ed., Causal Models in the Social Sciences. (Chicago: Aldine-Atherton).Google Scholar
Boaden, N., 1971. Urban Policy Making. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Brittan, S., 1971. Steering the Economy: the Role of the Treasury. (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Cochrane, D. and Orcutt, G., 1949. Application of Least Squares Regression to Relationships Containing Autocorrelated Error Terms, Journal of American Statistical Association, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, B., Barton, A., McMillan, I., and Williamson, V., 1971. Variations in Services for the Aged. (London: Bell and Sons).Google Scholar
Dilnot, A. and Morris, N., 1981. What do We Know About the Black Economy? Fiscal Studies 2, 1, 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dye, T. R., 1966. Politics, Economics and the Public, (Chicago: Rand McNally).Google Scholar
Field, F., Meacher, M., and Pond, C, 1977. To Him Who Hath: A Study of Poverty and Taxation, (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar
Frey, B., and Schneider, F., 1978. A Politico-Economic Model of the United Kingdom, Economic Journal 88, 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladden, E. N., 1968. The Essentials of Public Administration (London: Staples Press).Google Scholar
Heald, D., 1983. Public Expenditure: its Defence and Reform (Oxford: Martin Robertson).Google Scholar
Heclo, H., and Wildavsky, A., 1974. The Private Government of Public Money. (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Hepker, M. Z., 1973. A Modern Approach to Tax Law (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
Johnston, J., 1963. Econometric Methods (London: McGraw Hill).Google Scholar
MacDonald, K. I. 1977. ‘Path Analysis’, In O'Muircheartaigh, C. A. and Payne, C. (eds.), Model Fitting (London: John Wiley).Google Scholar
Newton, K., 1980. Balancing the Books: The Financial Problems of Local Government in Western Europe (London: Sage).Google Scholar
O'Connor, J., 1973. The Fiscal Crises of the State (New York: St. Martins Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, A., and Wiseman, J., 1961. The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom (London: George Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
Pliatzky, L., 1982. Getting and Spending. (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Radian, A., 1980. Resource Mobilisation in Poor Countries: Implementing Tax Policies (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books).Google Scholar
Robinson, A., and Sandford, C., 1983. Tax Policy Making in the United Kingdom (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
Rose, R., 1984. Do Parties Make A Difference? (London: Macmillan, 2nd edition).Google Scholar
Rose, R., and Karran, T., 1983. Increasing Taxes, Stable Taxes or Both? The Dynamics of United Kingdom Tax Revenues Since 1948, (Glasgow: U. of Strathclyde Studies in Public Policy No. 116).Google Scholar
Simon, H., 1957. ed., Models of Man (New York: John Wiley).Google Scholar
Tufte, E., 1978. Political Control of the Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, G., 1975. A Causal Model of State Welfare Expenditures, Journal of Politics, 37.Google Scholar
Williams, A., 1963. Public Finance and Budgetary Policy (London: Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
Wright, S., 1921. Correlation and Causation, Journal of Agricultural Research 20, 557–85.Google Scholar
Wright, S., 1980. Path Coefficients and Path Regressions: Alternative or Complimentary Concepts 2, Biometrics, 16, 189–202.Google Scholar