Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-pw477 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-03T05:02:07.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Business as usual: interest group access and representation across policy-making venues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

Frederick J. Boehmke ,
Sean Gailmard  and
John W. Patty
Frederick J. Boehmke*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Iowa, USA
Sean Gailmard*
Affiliation:
Travers Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley, USA
John W. Patty*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Washington University, USA
*
Frederick J. Boehmke Associate Professor Department of Political Science University of Iowa 341 Schaeffer Hall Iowa City, IA 52242 USA Email: [email protected]
Sean Gailmard Associate Professor Travers Department of Political Science University of California, Berkeley 734 Barrows Hall Berkeley, California 94720 USA Email: [email protected]
John W. Patty Associate Professor Department of Political Science Washington University Campus Box 1063 1 Brookings Drive St. Louis, MO 63130 USA Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We provide the first comprehensive study of lobbying across venues by studying interest group registrations in both the legislative and administrative branches. We present four major findings based on Federal and state data. Firstly, groups engage in substantial administrative lobbying relative to legislative lobbying. Secondly, the vast majority of groups lobby the legislature, but a large proportion of groups also lobby the bureaucracy. Thirdly, representational biases in legislative lobbying are replicated across venues: business groups dominate administrative lobbying at least as much as they do legislative lobbying. Finally, the level of interest group activity in one venue for a given policy area is strongly related to its level in the other venue. The findings potentially have important implications for the impact of institutional design on both the form and promotion of broad participation in policy-making as well as the ultimate content of policies chosen by democratic governments, broadly construed.

Keywords

Bureaucracyinterest groupslegislaturelobbying
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , April 2013 , pp. 3 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abney, G. (1988) Lobbying by the Insiders: Parallels of State Agencies and Interest Groups. Public Administration Review 48(5): 911–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, S. (1993) Regulating Lobbyists and Interest Group Influence. Journal of Politics 55(1): 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, S.Sened, I. (1993) The Role of Lobbyists: Entrepreneurs with Two Audiences. American Journal of Political Science 37(3): 834–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen-Smith, D. (1993) Information and Influence: Lobbying for Agendas and Votes. American Journal of Political Science 37(3): 799–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen-Smith, D.Wright, J. R. (1992) Competitive Lobbying for a Legislator's Vote. Social Choice and Welfare 9(3): 229–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen-Smith, D.Wright, J. R. (1994) Counteractive Lobbying. American Journal of Political Science 38(1): 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen-Smith, D.Wright, J. R. (1996) Theory and Evidence for Counteractive Lobbying. American Journal of Political Science 40(2): 543–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R.Leech, B. L. (1998) Basic Interests: The Importance of Groups in Politics and in Political Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R.Leech, B. L. (1999) Studying Interest Groups Using Lobbying Disclosure Reports. VOX POP, Newsletter of the Political Organizations and Parties Section of APSA 17(3): 1–3.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R.Leech, B. L. (2001) Interest Niches and Policy Bandwagons: Patterns of Interest Group Involvement in National Politics. Journal of Politics 63(4): 1191–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C.Leech, B. L. (2009) Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckmann, M. N. (2008) The President's Playbook: White House Strategies for Lobbying Congress. The Journal of Politics 70(2): 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendor, J.Meirowitz, A. (2004) Spatial Models of Delegation. American Political Science Review 98(2): 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennedsen, M.Feldmann, S. E. (2006) Lobbying Bureaucrats. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 108(4): 643–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boehmke, F., Gailmard, S.Patty, J. W. (2006) Whose Ear to Bend? Information Sources and Venue Choice in Policy Making. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1(2): 139–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, G. A.Wright, J. R. (1988) Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the US Supreme Court. The American Political Science Review 82(4): 1109–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, G. A., Hojnacki, M.Wright, J. R. (2000) The Lobbying Activities of Organized Interests in Federal Judicial Nominations. Journal of Politics 62(1): 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demir, T.Nyhan, R. C. (2008) The Politics–Administration Dichotomy: An Empirical Search for Correspondence between Theory and Practice. Public Administration Review 68(1): 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlong, S. R. (1997) Interest Group Influence on Rule Making. Administration & Society 29(3): 325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furlong, S. R. (1999) The Lobbying Disclosure Act and Interest Group Lobbying Data: Two Steps Forward and One Step Back. VOX POP, Newsletter of the Political Organizations and Parties Section of APSA 17(3): 4–6.Google Scholar
Furlong, S. R.Kerwin, C. M. (2005) Interest Group Participation in Rulemaking: A Decade of Change. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(3): 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailmard, S.Patty, J. W. (2013) Formal Models of Bureaucracy. Annual Review of Political Science 15: 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, M. M. (1998) Interest Groups in the Rule-Making Process: Who Participates? Whose Voices Get Heard? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8(2): 245–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, V.Lowery, D. (1996) The Population Ecology of Interest Representation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, S.Heberlig, E. S. (2002) Finding the Weak Link: The Choice of Institutional Venues by Interest Groups. The American Review of Politics 23: 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, E. S. (1939) The Impasse of Democracy. New York, NY: Harrison-Hilton.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. M. (1991) Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heclo, H. (1978) Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment. In The New American Political Enterprise, ed. Anthony King. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Heinz, J. P., Laumann, E. O., Nelson, R. L.Salisbury, R. H. (1993) The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C., Baumgartner, F. R., Berry, J. M.Leech, B. L. (2012) Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence: Reexamining Interest Group Research. Annual Review of Political Science 15(1): 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holyoke, T. T. (2003) Choosing Battlegrounds: Interest Group Lobbying across Multiple Venues. Political Research Quarterly 56(3): 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerwin, C. M. (2003) Rulemaking, 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Kollman, K. (1997) Inviting Friends to Lobby: Interest Groups, Ideological Bias, and Congressional Committees. American Journal of Political Science 41(2): 519–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollman, K. (1998) Outside Lobbying. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffont, J.Tirole, J. (1993) A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leech, B. L., Baumgartner, F. R., La Pira, T.Semanko, N. A. (2005) Drawing Lobbyists to Washington: Government Activity and the Demand for Advocacy. Political Research Quarterly 58(1): 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, S. (1993) A Signaling Model of Informative and Manipulative Political Action. American Political Science Review 88(2): 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, S. (1995a) Information, Access, and Contributions: A Signaling Model of Lobbying. Public Choice 85(3): 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, S. (1995b) A Signaling Model of Competitive Political Pressures. Economics & Politics 7(3): 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, S. (1998) An Information Rationale for the Power of Special Interests. American Political Science Review 92(4): 809–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowery, D., Gray, V., Fellowes, M.Anderson, J. (2004) Living in the Moment: Lags, Leads, and the Link Between Legislative Agendas and Interest Advocacy. Social Science Quarterly 85(2): 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, T. J. (1969) The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
McCubbins, M.Schwartz, T. (1984) Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science 28(1): 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, A. M. (2011) The Decision to Lobby Bureaucrats. Public Choice 147(1): 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, A.Yackee, S. W. (2007) Interest Group Competition on Federal Agency Rules. American Politics Research 35(3): 336–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. J. (2005) The Political Evolution of Principal-Agent Models. Annual Review of Political Science 8: 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosher, F. C. (1982) Democracy and the Public Service, 2 ed.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Riccucci, N. (1995) Unsung Heroes: Federal Execucrats Making a Difference. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, D. H.Piotrowski, S. J. (2005) The Legal-Institutional Framework for Interest Group Participation in Federal Administrative Policymaking. In The Interest Group Connection: Electioneering, Lobbying, and Policymaking in Washington, ed. Paul S. Herrnson, Ronald G. Shaiko Clyde Wilcox. 2 ed.Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, pp. 258–281.Google Scholar
Rourke, F. E. (1976) Bureaucracy, Politics, and Public Policy, 2 ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schlozman, K. L. (1984) What Accent the Heavenly Chorus? Political Equality and the American Pressure System. The Journal of Politics 46(4): 1006–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloof, R. (1998) Game-Theoretic Models of the Political Influence of Interest Groups. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloof, R. (2000) Interest Group Lobbying and the Delegation of Policy Authority. Economics and Politics 12(3): 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiller, P. T. (1990) Politicians, Interest Groups, and Regulators: A Multiple-Principals Agency Theory of Regulation, or “Let Them Be Bribed”. Journal of Law & Economics 33(1): 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, R. B. (1975) Reformation of American Administrative Law, The Harvard Law Review 88(8): 1667–1813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truman, D. B. (1951) The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Walker, J. L. Jr (1991) Mobilizing interest groups in America: Patrons, professions, and social movements. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, W. (1887) The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly 2: 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yackee, J. W.Yackee, S. W. (2006) A Bias towards Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the US Bureaucracy. Journal of Politics 68(1): 128–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar