Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:48:01.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Popular Support for the Welfare State: A Comparison Between Institutional Regimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Elim Papadakis
Affiliation:
Sociology, University of New England, Australia
Clive Bean
Affiliation:
Sociology, Australian National University*

Abstract

Apart from the preoccupation with raising revenue for the welfare state, the question of popular support is central to its future. Arguments about the prospects for the welfare state, about its social and political bases of support and about classifying different types of regime provide the context of our investigation. Our approach is to examine empirical evidence of the connection between support for the welfare state and (a) different types of regime and (b) social and political factors. The analysis of these relationships has important implications for policy-makers who are concerned about consent to their programmes and about the experiences of comparable regimes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alber, J. (1984) ‘Versorgungsklassen im Wohlfahrtsstaat.’ Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 36: 225–51.Google Scholar
Alber, J. (1988) ‘Is there a Crisis of the Welfare State? Cross-National Evidence from Europe, North America, and Japan.’ European Sociological Review, 4: 181203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, P. (1990) The Politics of Social Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, F. G. (1985) The Working Class and Welfare. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Coughlin, R. M. (1980) Ideology, Public Opinion and Welfare Policy. Berkeley, California: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Davis, J. A. and Jowell, R. (1989). ‘Measuring National Differences: An Introduction to the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP).’ In British Social Attitudes: Special International Report, eds. Jowell, R., Witherspoon, S. and Brook, L.. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Dalton, R., Flanagan, S. and Beck, P. (eds.) (1984) Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
De Swaan, A. (1988) In Care of the State. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, P. (1980) Urban Political Analysis. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. and Friedland, R. (1982) ‘Class Coalitions in the Making of West European Economies.’ Political Power and Social Theory, 3: 152.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. and Korpi, W. (1984) ‘Social Policy as Class Politics in Post-War Capitalism: Scandinavia, Austria, and Germany.’ In Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, ed. Goldthorpe, J. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, M. N., Mackie, T. T., Valen, H. et al. (1992) Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Free, L. A. and Cantril, H. (1968) The Political Beliefs of Americans. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E., Le Grand, J. et al. (1987) Not Only the Poor: The Middle Classes and the Welfare State. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Gould, A. (1981) ‘The Salaried Middle Class in the Corporatist Welfare State.’ Policy and Politics, 10: 417–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrop, M. and Miller, W. L. (1987) Elections and Voters: A Comparative Introduction. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartz, L. (1955) The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Heise, D. R. (1972) ‘Employing Nominal Variables, Induced Variables, and Block Variables in Path Analyses.’ Sociological Methods and Research, 1: 147–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P., Conrad, C. and Thomson, D. (eds.) (1989) Workers Versus Pensioners: Intergenerational Justice in an Ageing World. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. (1983) The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lepsius, M. R. (1979) ‘Soziale Ungleichheit und Klassenstrukturen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.’ In Klassen in der Europäischen Sozialgeschichte, ed. Wehler, H.. Göttingen: Vandenhoech and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. (1980) ‘Attitudes to Public Expenditure and their Relationship to Voting Preferences.’ Political Studies, 28: 284–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, B. and Shapiro, R. (1992) The Rational Public. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pampel, F. C. and Williamson, J. B. (1989) Age, Class, Politics, and the Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, A. and Sprague, J. (1986) Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rawson, D. W. (1978) Unions and Unionists in Australia. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Rimlinger, G. V. (1971) Welfare Policy and Industrialization in Europe, America and Russia. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Rose, R. (ed.) (1974) Electoral Behavior: A Comparative Handbook. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rose, R. (1989) Ordinary People in Public Policy. Beverly Hills and London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1969) ‘From the Sociology of Politics to Political Sociology.’ In Politics and the Social Sciences, ed. Lipset, S. M.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. (1981) Social Theory and the Urban Question. New York: Holmes & Meier.Google Scholar
Svallfors, S. (1991) ‘The Politics of Welfare Policy in Sweden: Structural Determinants and Attitudinal Cleavages.’ British Journal of Sociology, 42: 609–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1982) ‘Two Cheers for the Welfare State: Public Opinion and Private Welfare.’ Journal of Public Policy, 2: 319–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (1983) ‘The Welfare State and Individual Freedom: Attitudes to Welfare Spending and to the Power of the State.’ Political Studies, 31: 640–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titmuss, R. M. (1968) Commitment to Welfare. London: Allen & Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titmuss, R. M. (1971) The Gift Relationship. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Weisbrod, B. A. (1977). The Voluntary Nonprofit Sector. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Weissberg, R. (1976) Public Opinion and Popular Government. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H. L. (1976) The ‘New Corporatism’. Centralization and the Welfare State. Sage Professional Papers in Contemporary Political Sociology, Series no. 06–020. London and Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Zaller, J. (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung (1985) International Social Survey Programme, Role of Government – 1985: Codebook ZA-No. 1490. Köln: Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung.Google Scholar