Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:03:52.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficiency and Democratic Political Organisation; The Case for the Referendum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Bruno S. Frey
Bruno S. Frey
Affiliation:
Economist, University of Zurich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Familiar theories of market failure have diagnosed shortcomings in the economy, but theories of government failure argue that the state is incapable of correcting them. More than that, many criticisms of government implicitly or explicitly see failure as due to fundamental shortcomings of democracy. This paper argues that democratic forms of governments are not necessarily inefficient relative to other types of decisionmaking, for example, authoritarian government, and that if individuals are as rational in their actions and expectations as voters as they are meant to be in the market, then failures attributed to democracy lessen or disappear altogether. The paper demonstrates how more democracy, i.e. the use of the initiative and referendum, may actually improve the efficiency of government by giving the mass of citizens the information and opportunity to frustrate efforts of the classe politique to form a coalition against the voters. Empirical examples are drawn from the experience of Switzerland.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , July 1992 , pp. 209 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

Alesina, Alberto A. (1988) Macroeconomics and Politics. In: Fischer, Stanley (ed.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press: 11–55.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto A. (1989) Politics and business cycles in industrial democracies. Economic Policy 4 (8), 55–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnim, , von, Hans H. (1988) Macht macht erfinderisch. Der Diätenfall: ein politisches Lehrstück. Zürich:Edition Interform.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. (1951) Social Choke and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Aubert, Jean-Francois (1974) Petite Histoire Constitutionelle de la Suisse. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Barry, Norman P. (1988) The Invisible Hand in Economics and Politics. Hobart Paper III, London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1976) The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1983) A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 (08.): 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1985) Public Policies, Pressure Groups, and Dead Weight Costs. Journal of Public Economics 28: 329–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Duncan (1958) The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blankart, Charles B. (1992) A Public Choice View of Swiss Liberty. Paper prepared for the Liberty Fund Colloquium on ‘The Swiss Experience with Federal Liberty’, Brunnen, Switzerland, 03 27–9. 1992.Google Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey and Buchanan, James M. (1980) The Power to Tax. Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breton, Albert and Wintrobe, Ronald (1986) The Bureaucracy of Murder Revisited, Journal of Political Economy 94 (5): 905–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, David and Austin, Ranney (1978) Referendums. A Comparative Study of Practice and Theory. Washington: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Casella, Alessandra and Frey, Bruno S. (1992) Federalism and the Theory of Clubs: Towards an Economic Theory of Overlapping Political Jurisdictions. European Economic Review 36 (04):639–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. (1960) The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3 (10), 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condorcet, Marquis de (1795) Esquisse d'un tableau hislorique du progrès de I'esprit humain. Paris:Diannyère.Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold (1989) Efficiency, Competition and Policy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Denzau, Arthur T. (1985) Constitutional Change and Agenda Control. Public Choice 47: 183–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Eggertsson, Thrainn (1990) Economic Behaviour and Institutions: Principles of Neoinstitulional Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon (ed.) (1986) The Multiple Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. and Plott, Charles R. (1978) Committee Decisions under Majority Rule: An Experimental Study. American Political Science Review 72 (06): 575–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. (1983) Democratic Economic Policy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. (1984) International Political Economics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. and Gebhard, Kirchgassner (1992) Diskursethik, Politische Ökonomie und Volksabstimmungen. Discussion paper, Institute for Empirical Economic Research, University of Zurich,02 1992.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. and Eichenberger, Reiner (1989) Should Social Scientists Care about Choice Anomalies? Rationality and Society 1 (07): 101–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. and Eichenberger, Reiner (1992) Economics and Economists: A European Perspective. American Economic Review 82 (05): 216–20.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1983) Diskursethik - Notizen zu einem Begründungsprozess. In: Habermas, Jürgen (ed.), Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp: 53–125.Google Scholar
Hertig, Hans Peter (1984) Volksabstimmungen. In: Klöti, Ulrich (ed.). Handbuch des Polilischen Systems der Schweiz, Vol. 2, 247–77. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. (1982) Shifting Involvements.Private Interests and Public Action. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. (1982) Shifting Involvements. Private Interests and Public Action. Oxford:Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. (1982a) Rival Interpretations of Market Society: Civilizing, Destructive, or Feeble? Journal of Economic Literature 20 (12), 1463–84.Google Scholar
Höfle, O. (1985) Strategien der Humanitüdt: Zur Ethik öffenllicher Entscheidungen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kalt, J. H. and Zupan, M.A. (1984) Capture and Ideology in the Economic Theory of Politics. American Economic Review 74 (06): 279–300.Google Scholar
Kau, J. B. and Rubin, P. N. (1979) Self-interest, Ideology and Logrolling in Congressional Voting. Journalof Law and Economics 22 (12.): 365–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchgässner, Gebhard (1991) Homo Oeconomicus. Das Ökonomische Modell individuellen Verhaltens und seine Anwendung in den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften. Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck).Google Scholar
Kolm, Serge-Christoph (1988) Economics in Europe and in the U.S., European Economic Review, 32, 207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leijonhufvud, Axel (1973) Live Among the Econ. Western Economic Journal 11 (09), 327–37.Google Scholar
Magee, Stephen P., Brock, William A. and Young, Leslie (1989) Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy Theory. Political Economy in General Equilibrium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maital, Shlomo (1986) Prometheus Rebound: On Welfare-Improving Constraints. Eastern Economic Journal 12 (07–09.), 337–43.Google Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D. (1976) Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control. Journal of Economic Theory 12 (06): 472–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Dennis C. (1989) Public Choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, William D. (1989) Alternative approaches to the political business cycle. Brookings papers on economic activity 2: 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, Wallace E. (1977) The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Palda, Filip (1992) Can Repressive Regimes be Moderated Through Foreign Aid? Public Choice.Google Scholar
Pommerehne, Werner W. (1978) Institutional approaches to public expenditure: Empirical evidence from Swiss municipalities. Journal of Public Economics 9 (04): 255–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pommerehne, Werner W. (1990) The Empirical Relevance of Comparative Institutional Analysis. European Economic Review 34 (05): 458–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pommerehne, Werner W. and Jean-Dominique, Lafay (1983) Ökonometrische Untersuchungen von Wahlkampfausgaben: Ein Überblick. Jahrbuch für Sozialwissenschaft 43: 20–58.Google Scholar
Rougement, Denis de (1965) La Suisse: On L'Histoire d'un Peuple Heureux. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. (1980) The Intimate Contest for Self-Command. Public Interest 60 (Summer):94–118.Google Scholar
Schneider, Friedrich and Frey, Bruno S. (1988) Politico-Economic Models of Macroeconomic Policy: A Review of the Empirical Evidence. In: Willett, Thomas D. (ed.). The Political Economy of Money, Inflation and Unemployment. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 240–75.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. (1979 Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory. In Hahn, Frank and Hollis, Martin (eds.), Philosophy and Economic Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 87–109.Google Scholar
Reprinted in: Sen, Amartya K., Choice, Welfare and Measurement, Oxford: Blackwell, 1982, 84–107.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Weingast, Barry R. (1981) Political Preferences for the Pork Barrel: A Generalization, American Journal of Political Science 25, 1 (02): 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1972) Economic Competition and Political Competition. Public Choice 13 (Fall):91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1984) The Intellectual and the Marketplace. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. and Becker, Gary S. (1977) De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. American Economic Review 67 (03): 76–90.Google Scholar
Tiebout, Charles M. (1956) A Pure Theory of Local Expenditure. Journal of Political Economy 64 (10): 416–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, Gordon (1981) Why so much stability? Public Choice 37:189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, Gordon (1987) Autocracy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaubel, Roland and Willett, Thomas D. (eds) (1991), The Political Economy of International Organisations:A Public Choice Approach. Denver: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Wintrobe, Ronald. (1987) The Market for Corporate Control and the Market for Political Control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3 (Fall): 435–48.Google Scholar
Wintrobe, Ronald (1990) The Tinpot and the Totalitarian: An Economic Theory of Dictatorship. American Political Science Review 84 (3): 849–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittman, Donald (1989) Why Democracies Produce Efficient Results. Journal of Political Economy 97 (12): 1395–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar