Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:04:25.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conspiracy and The Policy Process: A Case Study of the New Zealand Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Joe Wallis
Joe Wallis
Affiliation:
Economics, University of Otago, PO Box 56 Dunedin, New Zealand Fax: 64-3-4798174 E-Mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper advances the concept of a policy conspiracy – perpetrators strive together to steer the policy process in a direction which they believe to be worthwhile and possible. A policy conspiracy is conceived as an exclusive social network of policy participants who commit themselves to the advancement of a policy quest which embodies their shared hopes and who promote one another to positions of influence on the basis of the mutual trust they develop through regular interaction. The degree to which the network of technocrats, technopols and change agents who played a pivotal role in the implementation and consolidation of the ‘New Zealand experiment’ between 1984 and 1993 exhibit these characteristics is considered. By examining the way this policy conspiracy took advantage of a significant window of opportunity for reform, this paper seeks to make a contribution to the literature concerned with the conditions for radical policy reform.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 1 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akerlof, G.A., 1980, A Theory of Social Custom, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94: 719–75.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R., 1984, The Evolution of Co-operation, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bollard, A., 1994, New Zealand, in Williamson, J. ed., The Political Economy of Policy Reform, Washington: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Bollard, A., Lattimore, R. and Silverstone, B. (eds.), 1996, A Study of Economic Reform: The Case of New Zealand, Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Bollard, A. and Mayes, D.G., 1993, Lessons for Europe from New Zealand's Liberalisation Experience, National Institute Economic Review: 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boston, J., 1992, The Treasury: Its Role, Philosophy and Influence, in Gold, H. (ed), New Zealand Politics in Perspective, Auckland: Longman Paul.Google Scholar
Casson, M.C., 1991, Economics of Business Culture: Game Theory, Transactions Costs and Economic Performance, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, M.D., March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P., 1972, A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, R., 1993, Emotional Energy as the Common Denominator of Rational Social Action, Rationality and Society, 5, 2: 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, R.O., 1993, Unfinished Business, Auckland: Random House.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, P., 1991, Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice, London: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Easton, B., 1989, The Making of Rogernomics, Auckland: Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
Easton, B., 1994, How Did the Health Reforms Blitzkreig Fail? Political Science, 46, 2, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eco, Umberto, , 1988, Foucault's Pendulum, London, Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar
Elster, J., 1989, The Cement of Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gambetta, D., 1988, Trust: Making and Breaking Co-operative Relations, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gardner, H., 1995, Leading Minds, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, E., 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Haggard, S. and Kaufman, R., 1992, The Politics of Economic Adjustment, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, R., 1982, Collective Action, Baltimore, John Hopkins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves-Heap, S., 1989, Rationality in Economics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haworth, N., 1992, National Sovereignty, Deregulation and the Multinational: New Zealand in the 1980s, in Deeks, J. and Perry, N. (eds), Controlling Interests, Auckland: Auckland.Google Scholar
Hazeldine, T., 1996, The New Zealand Economic Revolution After Ten Years, Unpublished Paper, Auckland, Auckland University.Google Scholar
Heclo, H., 1978, Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment, in King, A. (ed.), The New American Political System, Washington: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G., 1988, Economics and Institutions, Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollander, E.P., 1978, Leadership Dynamics, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hood, C., 1991, A Public Management For All Seasons, Public Administration, 69, 1, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, A., 1992, The Players, New Zealand Listener, 5: 14–16.Google Scholar
Jones, S., 1984, The Economics of Conformism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kelley, D., 1972, Why Conservative Churches Are Growing, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kelsey, J., 1995, The New Zealand Experiment: A World Model for Structural Adjustment, Auckland: Auckland University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, J.W., 1984, Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Kreps, D. and Wilson, R., 1982, ‘Reputation and Imperfect Information’, Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 253–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, T., 1990, ‘Private and Public Preferences’, Economics and Philosophy, 6, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. and Olsen, J., 1989, Rediscovering Institutions, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Massey, P., 1995, New Zealand: Market Liberalization in a Developed Economy, New York: St Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C., Wright, , 1956, The Power Elite, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moon, J., 1995, Innovative Leadership and Policy Change: Lessons From Thatcher, Governance, 8:1: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosca, G., 1939, The Ruling Class, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pareto, V., 1915–1919, 1963, A Treatise on General Sociology, New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Pereira, L., Maravall, J. and Przeworski, A., 1993, Economic Reforms in New Democracies: A Social-democratic Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, R., 1995, Making a Difference, Christchurch: Shoal Bay Press.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D., 1996, Understanding Economic Policy Reform, Journal of Economic Literature, 34: 9–41.Google Scholar
Rose, R., 1987, Steering the Ship of State: One Tiller But Two Pairs of Hands, British Journal of Political Science, 17: 409–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, P., 1988, An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy change and the Role of Policy-oriented Learning Therein, Policy Sciences, 21: 129–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, P., 1991, Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process, Political Science and Politics, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, H., 1991, Can Economic Stabilization and Adjustment Work: Lessons From New Zealand, 1984–1990, International Organizations, 45: –12.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K., 1977, ‘Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behaviour Foundations of Economic Theory’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 317–344.Google Scholar
Simon, H., 1983, Reason in Human Affairs, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Simpson, J. and Weiner, E., 1989, Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, C.B., 1994, The Psychology of Hope, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Sutherlands, S., 1989, Hope, in Vesey, G. (ed), The Philosophy in Christianity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C., 1985, Philosophy and the Human Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C., 1989, The Self and Modern Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ullman-Marglitt, E., 1977, The Emergence of Norms, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M., 1949, The Methodology of the Social Services, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, J., 1994, The Political Economy of Policy Reform, Washington: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Young, H., 1989, One of us, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar