Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:41:37.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reply to Andrea Louise Campbell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

Eric M. Patashnik*
Affiliation:
University of Virginia

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Forum
Copyright
Copyright © Donald Critchlow and Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1. Bailey, Michael A., Goldstein, Judith, and Weingast, Barry R., “The Institutional Roots of American Trade Policy: Politics, Coalitions, and International Trade,” World Politics 49, no. 3 (April 1997): 309–38, at 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Brown, Lawrence D., New Policies, New Politics: Government’s Response to Government Growth: A Staff Paper (Washington, D.C., 1983).Google Scholar

3. See, for example, Mead, Lawrence M., The New Paternalism: Supervisory Approaches to Poverty (Washington, D.C., 1997).Google Scholar

4. Campbell, Andrea Louis, How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Citizen Activism and the American Welfare State (Princeton, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Eric M. Patashnik and Julian E. Zelizer, “When Policy Does Not Remake Politics: The Limits of Policy Feedback,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association in Toronto, August 2009.

6. Derthick, Martha, Policymaking for Social Security (Washington, D.C., 1979).Google Scholar

7. See Pierson, Paul, “The Study of Policy Development,” Journal of Policy History 17, no. 1 (2005): 34–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and “The Costs of Marginalization: Qualitative Methods in the Study of American Politics,” Comparative Political Studies 40, no. 2 (2007): 145–69.