Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:55:20.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Presidential Pocket Veto: Its Use and Legality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

Samuel B. Hoff
Samuel B. Hoff
Affiliation:
Delaware State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The general constitutional authority of the President to veto legislation passed by Congress has recently received renewed scholarly attention. However, few studies have focused on the pocket veto—the power to negate proposed laws sent for approval without the possibility of reconsideration—and its ramifications for presidential effectiveness. This research comprehensively investigates the creation, development, and employment of the pocket veto. First, this article will trace the history of this form of executive prerogative from colonial times through its establishment in the Constitution. Second, it will review the use of the pocket veto in the nineteenth century. Third, it will undertake a seminal empirical probe of influences on public-bill pocket-veto frequency from 1889 to 1989. Fourth, I will delineate congressional and court challenges to the use of this executive device. In the final section, I will assess the consequences of heightened consternation over pocket-veto use.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Policy History , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , April 1994 , pp. 188 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Mason, Edward C., The Veto Power, 1789–1889 (New York, 1890)Google Scholar.

2. Cummings, Milton C. and Wise, David, Democracy Under Pressure (San Diego, 1985)Google Scholar.

3. Mason, The Veto Power, 1789–1889, 17.

4. Newbold, Robert C., The Albany Congress and Plan of Union of 1754 (New York, 1955).Google Scholar

5. Fisher, Louis, Constitutional Conflicts Between Congress and the President (Princeton, 1985)Google Scholar.

6. Burnett, Edmund C., The Continental Congress (New York, 1964), 34.Google Scholar

7. Mason, The Veto Power, 1789–1889, 18.

8. Spitzer, Robert J., The Presidential Veto: Touchstone of the American Presidency (Albany, N.Y., 1988), 9.Google Scholar

9. Ibid., 9–10.

10. Sanders, Jennings B., The President of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789: A Study in American Institutional History (Gloucester, Mass., 1971), 71.Google Scholar

11. Burnett, The Continental Congress. Warren, Charles, The Making of the Constitution (New York, 1967).Google Scholar

12. Story, Joseph, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (Boston: Hilliard, Gray, and Co., 1833).Google Scholar

13. Spitzer, The Presidential Veto, 18.

14. Farrand, Max, ed., The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 (New Haven, 1966), 1:98–103.Google Scholar

15. Ibid., 3:624.

16. Ibid., 3:627.

17. Ibid., 2:181.

18. Ibid., 2:594.

19. Storing, Herbert J., ed., The Complete Anti-Federalist (Chicago, 1981), vol. 5, essay 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20. Bass, David J., “The Veto Power of the President: Its Theory and Practice” (Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago, 1972), 62.Google Scholar

21. Jackson, Carlton, Presidential Vetoes, 1792–1945 (Athens, Ga., 1967), 8.Google Scholar

22. Mason, The Veto Power, 1789–1889.

23. Watson, David K., The Constitution of the United States (Chicago, 1910)Google Scholar.

24. Mason, The Veto Power, 1789–1889, 113.

25. Ford, Henry, The Rise and Growth of American Politics (New York, 1967).Google Scholar

26. Cooper, Thomas V., American Politics (Philadelphia, Firestone Publishing Co., 1883), Book 2, 28.Google Scholar

27. Richardson, James D., Messages and Papers of the Presidents (New York: Bureau of National Literature, 1897), 3:1075.Google Scholar

28. Mason, The Veto Power, 1789–1889.

29. Cooper, American Politics.

30. Richardson, Messages and Papers of the Presidents, 7:3130–31.

31. Bellamy, Calvin, “The Growing Potential of the Pocket Veto: Another Area of Increasing Presidential Power,” Illinois Bar Journal 61 (1972): 87.Google Scholar

32. Serven, B., “The Constitution and the Pocket Veto,” New York University Law Journal 7 (1934).Google Scholar

33. Mason, The Veto Power, 1789–1889.

34. Zinn, Charles J., The Veto Power of the President (Washington, D.C., 1951).Google Scholar

35. Fisher, Constitutional Conflicts Between Congress and the President. Spitzer, The Presidential Veto.

36. Vose, Clement E., “The Memorandum Pocket Veto,” Journal of Politics 26 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Bass, “The Veto Power of the President.”

37. Lee, Jong R., “Presidential Vetoes from Washington to Nixon,” Journal of Politics 37 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38. Copeland, Gary W., “When Congress and the President Collide: Why Presidents Veto Legislation,” Journal of Politics 45 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39. Rohde, David W. and Simon, Dennis M., “Presidential Vetoes and Congressional Response: A Study of Institutional Conflict,” American Journal of Political Science 29 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Woolley, John T., “Institutions, the Election Cycle, and Presidential Veto,” American Journal of Political Science 35 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40. Simonton, Dean K., “Presidential Inflexibility and Veto Behavior: Two Individual-Level Situational Interactions,” Journal of Personality 55 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41. “Private Bills in Congress,” Harvard Law Review 79 (1966)Google Scholar.

42. Vose, “The Memorandum Pocket Veto,” 404.

43. Miller, Arthur S., “Congressional Power to Define the Presidential Pocket Veto Power,” Vanderbilt Law Review 25 (1972): 560.Google Scholar

44. Keefe, William and Ogul, Morris, The American Legislative Process: Congress and the States (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1981)Google Scholar.

45. Hoff, Samuel B., “Congressional Leadership in Overriding Presidential Vetoes, 1889–1989,”paper delivered at the 1989 Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association,Philadelphia.Google Scholar

46. Hoff, Samuel B., “Saying No: Presidential Support and Veto Use, 1889–1989,” American Politics Quarterly 19 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

47. See Edwards, George C., The Public Presidency (New York, 1983)Google Scholar, and DiClerico, Robert A., The American President (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1983)Google Scholar.

48. Grossman, Michael, Kumar, Martha, and Rourke, Francis, “The Aging of Administrations: The Waning of Power and the Opportunity for Rejuvenation During Second Terms,”paper delivered at the 1985 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association,New Orleans.Google Scholar

49. Jarding, Stephen J., “Historical Assessments of Succession Presidents,”paper delivered at the 1985 Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association,Nashville.Google Scholar

50. See Edwards, George C., “Presidential Influence in the House: Presidential Prestige as a Source of Presidential Power,” American Political Science Review 70 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Hoff, Samuel B., “Influences on the Success Rate of Presidentially-Supported Bills, 1954–1984,”paper delivered at the 1985 Annual Meeting of the New York State Political Science Association,New YorkGoogle Scholar.

51. See Towle, Katherine A., “The President's Veto Since 1889,” American Political Science Review 31 (1937)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kallenbach, Joseph E., The American Chief Executive (New York, 1966)Google Scholar; and Taylor, Frederick E., “An Analysis of Factors Purported to Influence the Use of, and Congressional Response to the Use of the Presidential Veto” (Ph. D. diss., Georgetown University, 1971)Google Scholar.

52. See Mueller, John E., War Presidents, and Public Opinion (New York, 1973)Google Scholar, and Lee, Jong R., “Presidential Choice: Limits of Leadership in Foreign Policy” (Ph.D. diss., Yale University, 1975a).Google Scholar

53. Hoff, “Saying No: Presidential Support and Veto Use, 1889–1989.”

54. Ibid.

55. Pocket Veto Case (279 U.S. 655) 1929.

56. Wright v. United States (302 U.S. 583) 1938.

57. Kennedy v. Sampson (364 F. Supp. 1075) 1973.

58. Kennedy v. Sampson (55 F. 2nd 430) 1974.

59. Kennedy v. Jones (412 F. Supp. 353) 1976.

60. Barnes V. Carmen (582 F. Supp. 163) 1984.

61. Barnes v. Kline (759 F. 2nd 21) 1985.

62. Ibid.

63. Burke v. Barnes (479 U.S. 361) 1987.

64. Alston, Chuck, “Bush Crusades on Many Fronts to Retake President's Turf,” Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report (1990): 293.Google Scholar

65. Veto Message on H.R. 3233, 11 June 1940, White House Official File 42-Veto Messages, Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library.

66. Hearing Before tne Subcommittee on the Legislative Process, Committee on Rules, U.S. House of Representatives (Washington, D.C., 1989), 2.

67. Kennedy, Edward M., “Congress, the President, and the Pocket Veto,” Virginia Law Review 63 (1977): 380–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

68. Calvin Bellamy, “The Growing Potential of the Pocket Veto,” 90.

69. Dumbrell, John W. and Lees, John D., “Presidential Pocket-Veto Power: A Constitutional Anachronism?” Political Studies 28 (1980): 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

70. Hoff, Samuel B., “Divided Government and the Decline of Bipartisanship in Presidential-Congressional Relations, 1953–1990,”paper delivered at the 1990 Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Political Science Association, Providence.Google Scholar

71. Mason, The Veto Power, 1789–1889, 140.

72. Vose, “The Memorandum Pocket Veto,” 405.

73. Presidential Vetoes, 1789–1976 (Washington, D.C., 1978)Google Scholar. Presidential Vetoes 1977–1984 (Washington, D.C., 1985)Google Scholar.

74. (Boston, 1989).

75. Nelson, Michael, ed., Guide to the Presidency (Washington, D.C., 1990)Google Scholar.

76. Ornstein, Norman J., Mann, Thomas E, and Malbin, Michael, Vital Statistics on Congress, 1989–1990 (Washington, D.C., 1990)Google Scholar.