Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:44:05.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diplomatic History and Policy History: Finding Common Ground

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Robert J. McMahon
Robert J. McMahon
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is difficult to imagine two fields of scholarly inquiry with so much in common and yet so little interaction as diplomatic and policy history. Policy, policy process, policymakers, policy origins, policy intentions, policy consequences—those terms and ones of a similar stripe roll just as easily off the tongues and word processors of diplomatic historians as of self-described policy historians. Moreover, the questions asked and the methods employed by the two groups of scholars bear a striking resemblance. Both fields focus perforce on the state and state-centered actors, concern themselves with elite-level decision making, interrogate fundamental issues of power within societies, and concentrate overwhelmingly on the twentieth century to the relative neglect of earlier periods. Each field occupies as well an embattled position within the larger historical profession, where social and cultural history have predominated since the 1960s.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Policy History , Volume 17 , Issue 1: Special Issue: New Directions in Policy History , January 2005 , pp. 93 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Zelizer, Julian E., “Clio's Lost Tribe: Public Policy History Since 1978,” Journal of Policy History 12 (2000): 373–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Neustadt, Richard E. and May, Ernest R., Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision Makers (New York, 1986).Google Scholar

3. Chace, James, “In Search of Absolute Security,” in The Imperial Tense: Problems and Prospects of American Empire, ed. Bacevich, Andrew (Chicago, 2003), 120.Google Scholar

4. Leuchtenberg, William E., “The Pertinence of Political History: Reflections on the Significance of the State in America,” Journal of American History 73 (12 1986): 585–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Gillon, Steven M., “The Future of Political History, Journal of Policy History 9 (1997): 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Zelizer, “Clio's Lost Tribe,” 369.

6. See especially LaFeber, Walter, “The World and the United States,” American Historical Review 100 (10 1995): 1015–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. These points and some of what follows are adapted from McMahon, Robert J., “Toward a Pluralist Vision: The Study of American Foreign Relations as International History and National History,” in Explaining the History of American Foreign Relations, ed. Hogan, Michael J. and Paterson, Thomas G. (2d rev. ed., New York, 2004), 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Beard, Charles and Smith, George H. E., The Idea of National Interest: An Analytical Study of American Foreign Policy (New York, 1934)Google Scholar; Beard, Charles, The Open Door at Home (New York, 1935).Google Scholar

9. McCormick, Thomas J., America's Half-Century: United States Foreign Policy in the Cold War (Baltimore, 1989)Google Scholar; Gaddis, John Lewis, We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History (Oxford, 1997)Google Scholar. For useful overviews, see Hunt, Michael H., “The Long Crisis in U.S. Diplomatic History: Coming to Closure,” in America in the World: The Historiography of American Foreign Relations Since 1941, ed. Hogan, Michael J. (New York, 1995)Google Scholar; LaFeber, “The World and the United States”; Craig, Campbell, “The Not-So-Strange Career of Charles Beard,” Diplomatic History 25 (Spring 2001): 251–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For an up-to-date survey of the historiography, see Schulzinger, Robert D., ed., A Companion to American Foreign Relations (Malden, Mass., 2003).Google Scholar

10. Frank Ninkovich, “Paradigms Lost: The Cultural Turn and the Globalization of U.S. Diplomatic History” (forthcoming).

11. Ibid.

12. Maier, Charles S., “Marking Time: The Historiography of Internaitonal Relations,” in The Past Before Us: Contemporary Historical Writing in the United States, ed. Kammen, Michael (Ithaca, 1980), 356.Google Scholar

13. Graham, Hugh Davis, “The Stunted Career of Policy History: A Critique and an Agenda,” Public Historian 15 (Spring 1993): 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. See, for example, Hays, Samuel P., American Political History as Social Analysis: Essays (Knoxville, Tenn., 1980).Google Scholar

15. Gendzel, Glen, “Political Culture: Genealogy of a Concept,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 28 (Autumn 1997): 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16. Silbey, Joel H., “The State and Practice of American Political History at the Millennium: The Nineteenth Century as a Test Case,” Journal of Policy History 11 (1999): 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. Ibid., 3, 9.

18. Marks, Sally, “The World According to Washington,” Diplomatic History 11 (Summer 1987): 265–267, 281–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Thorne, Christopher, “After the Europeans: American Designs for the Remaking of Southeast Asia,” Diplomatic History 12 (Spring 1988): 206–208Google Scholar; Hunt, Michael H., “Internationalizing U.S. Diplomatic History: A Practical Agenda,” Diplomatic History 15 (Winter 1991): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

19. May, Ernest R., The World War and American Isolation, 1914–1917 (Cambridge, Mass., 1959)Google Scholar; Iriye, Akira, After Imperialism: The Search for a New Order in the Far East, 1921–1931 (Cambridge, Mass., 1965).Google Scholar

20. Hunt, “The Long Crisis in U.S. Diplomatic History,” 110.

21. Some representative recent work includes Stueck, William, The Korean War: An International History (Princeton, 1995)Google Scholar; Jian, Chen, Mao's China and the Cold War (Chapel Hill, 2001)Google Scholar; Logevall, Fredrik, Choosing War: The Lost Chance for Peace and the Escalation of the War in Vietnam (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1999)Google Scholar; Bradley, Mark Philip, Imagining Vietnam and America: The Making of Postcolonial Vietnam, 1919–1950 (Chapel Hill, 2000)Google Scholar; Naftali, Timothy and Furchenko, Alexandr, “One Hell of a Gamble”: Kennedy, Castro, and Khrushchev, 1958–1964 (New York, 1997)Google Scholar; Langley, Lester, The Americas in the Age of Revolution, 1750–1850 (Athens, Ga., 1996)Google Scholar; Saul, Norman E., War and Revolution: The United States and Russia, 1914–1921 (Lawrence, Kan., 2001)Google Scholar; Suri, Jeremi, Power and Protest: Global Revolution and the Rise of Detente (Cambridge, Mass., 2003).Google Scholar

22. Hershberg, Jim letter, Cold War International History Project Bulletin (Spring 1992): 1, 6.Google Scholar

23. See, for example, Stueck, The Korean War; Naftali and Furchenko, “One Hell of a Gamble”; Gleijeses, Piero, Conflicting Missions: Havana, Washington, and Africa, 1959–1976 (Chapel Hill, 2002).Google Scholar

24. Wagnleitner, Reinhold, Coca-Colonization and the Cold War: The Cultural Mission of the United States in Austria after the Second World War, trans. Wolf, Diana M. (Chapel Hill, 1994)Google Scholar; Gienow-Hecht, Jessica C. E., Transmission Impossible: American Journalism as Cultural Diplomacy in Postwar Germany, 1945–1955 (Baton Rouge, 1999).Google Scholar

25. Kroes, Rob, If You've Seen One, You've Seen the Mall: Europeans and American Mass Culture (Urbana, Ill., 1996)Google Scholar. See also “The American Occupation of Germany in Cultural Perspective: A Roundtable,” Diplomatic History 23 (Winter 1999): 1–77Google Scholar; “Roundtable: Cultural Transfer or Cultural Imperialism?” Diplomatic History 24 (Summer 2000): 465–528Google Scholar; Hogan, Michael J., ed., The Ambiguous Legacy: U.S. Foreign Relations in the “American Century” (New York, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wagnleitner, Reinhold and May, Elaine Tyler, eds., “Here, There and Everywhere”: The Foreign Politics of American Popular Culture (Hanover, N.H., 2000).Google Scholar

26. Bender, Thomas, “Introduction: Historians, the Nation, and the Plenitude of Narratives,” in Rethinking American History in a Global Age, ed. Bender, Thomas (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 2002), 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

27. An excellent example of such a work is Rogers, Daniel, Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age (Cambridge, Mass., 1998)Google Scholar. See also Doyle, Don H., Nations Divided: America, Italy, and the Southern Question (Athens, Ga., 2002)Google Scholar; and the essays in Bender, ed., Rethinking American History.

28. Suri, Power and Protest.

29. Logevall, Choosing War.

30. Representative works include Ninkovich, Frank, Modernity and Power: A History of the Domino Theory in the Twentieth Century (Chicago, 1994)Google Scholar; Rosenberg, Emily, Financial Missionaries to the World: The Politics and Culture of Dollar Diplomacy, 1900–1930 (Cambridge, Mass., 1999)Google Scholar; Rotter, Andrew J., Comrades at Odds: The United States and India, 1947–1964 (Ithaca, 2000)Google Scholar; Latham, Michael E., Modernization as Ideology: American Social Science and “Nation Building” in the Kennedy Era (Chapel Hill, 2000)Google Scholar; Costigliola, Frank, “‘Unceasing Urge for Penetration’: Gender, Pathology, and Emotion in George Kennan's Formation of the Cold War,” Journal of American History 83 (03 1997): 1309–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, “The Nuclear Family: Tropes of Gender and Pathology in the Western Alliance,” Diplomatic History 21 (Spring 1997): 163–83.

31. Ninkovich, “Paradigms Lost.”

32. Hogan, Michael J., “The ‘Next Big Thing’: The Future of Diplomatic History in a Global Age,” Diplomatic History 28 (01 2004): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33. Gordon, Linda, Pitied But Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare (New York, 1994)Google Scholar; Quadagno, Jill, The Color of Welfare: How Racism Undermined the War on Poverty (New York, 1994).Google Scholar

34. Hunt, Michael H., Ideology and U.S. Foreign Policy (New Haven, 1987)Google Scholar; Borstelmann, Thomas, The Cold War and the Color Line: Race Relations and American Foreign Policy Since 1945 (Cambridge, Mass., 2001)Google Scholar; Dudziak, Mary, Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy (Princeton, 2000)Google Scholar; Dean, Robert, Imperial Brotherhood (Amherst, Mass., 2001)Google Scholar; Rotter, Comrades at Odds.

35. Zelizer, Julian E., Taxing America: Wilbur D. Mills, Congress, and the State, 1945–1975 (Cambridge, Mass., 1998)Google Scholar; Hogan, Michael J., A Cross of Iron: Harry S. Truman and the Origins of the National Security State, 1945–1954 (New York, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar