Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:10:54.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Whig Interpretation of the Welfare State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

Douglas E. Ashford
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh

Extract

Butterfield's well-known warning to historians may hold important lessons for the analysis of the contemporary welfare state. In his view, the Whig historians distorted history by interpreting the past in terms of the present. They allowed themselves to become “dispensers of moral judgments” by dividing the world into the friends and enemies of progress. Many contemporary explanations of welfare states pose the same problem, not so much because social science intentionally excludes the past, but because the search for rigorous empirical explanations of our present choices and accomplishments is divorced from the past. As Himmelfarb noted in her comments on the study of social history, the investigations of this intricate transformation of nineteenth-century liberal states are now virtually “two cultures.”

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. The term “Whiggish history” originates with Herbert Butterfield's well-known work, The Whig Interpretation of History (London, 1931)Google Scholar, and provided a platform for the later development of idealistic historiography of Collingwood, R. G., The Idea of History (Oxford, 1946)Google Scholar. The French analogue to Butterfield is Halevy, Elie, The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism (London, 1928)Google Scholar. Both men rejected utilitarianism and its influence on the writing of history.

2. Butterfield, 4.

3. Himmelfarb, Gertrude, “Social History and Moral Imagination,” in Anderson, Q., ed., Art, Politic and Will—Essays in Honour of Lionel Trilling (New York, 1977), 28.Google Scholar

4. Pocock, J. A. G., Politics, Language and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History (New York, 1971) 18.Google Scholar Examples of more extreme uses of scientific methods are Collier, David and Messick, Richard E., “Prerequisites versus Diffusion: Testing Alternative Explanations of Social Security Adoption,” American Political Science Review 69 (1975), 12991315;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Cameron, David, “The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis,” American Political Science Review 72 (1978), 1243–61. See also the more qualified studies of welfare states of Pryor and Wilenski below.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Kuhn, Thomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, 1962).Google Scholar

6. Thomas, David, Naturalism and Social Science: A Post'Empiricist Philosophy of Social Science (Cambridge, 1979)Google Scholar, and Apel, Karl-Otto, Understanding and Explanation: A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective (Cambridge, 1984).Google Scholar

7. Skinner, Quentin, “The Limits of Historical Explanation,” Philosophy 41 (1969), 16.Google Scholar

8. Jones, Robert A., “On Understanding a Sociological Classic,” American Journal of Sociology 83 (1977), 287–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Skinner, 18.

10. Stearns, Peter N., Old Age in European Society (New York, 1976).Google Scholar

11. Harris, Jose, Unemployment and Politics: A Study in English Social Policy, 1886–1914 (Oxford, 1972), 4.Google Scholar

12. Himmelfarb, Gertrude, The Idea of Poverty: England in the Early Industrial Age (New York, 1985).Google Scholar

13. Booth, Charles, Life and Labour of the People of London (London, 18891903, 17Google Scholar vols.; reprinted New York, 1967). Rowntree, Seebohm, Poverty: A Study of Town Life (London, 1901; reprinted New York, 1969). Henry Mayhew, London Labour and the London Poor (1862–1864, 4 vols; reprinted by John D. Rosenberg, ed., New York, 1967).Google Scholar

14. Annan, Noel. The Curious Strength of Positivism in English Political Thought (London, 1959), 18.Google Scholar

15. Searle., G. R.The Quest for National Efficiency: A Study in British Politica and Political Thought, 1899–1914 (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1971)Google Scholar. Hay, J. R., The Origins of the Liberal Welfare Reforms, 1906–1914 (London, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16. Pinker, Robert, Social Theory and Social Policy (London, 1971), 12.Google Scholar

17. Carrier, John and Kendall, Ian, “The Development of Welfare States: The Production of Plausible Accounts,” Journal of Social Policy 6 (1977), 271–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18. Plant, Raymond, Lesser, Harry, and Taylor-Goodby, Peter, Political Philosophy and Social Welfare (London, 1980), 174–77.Google Scholar

19. Skinner, 200.

20. Eulau, Heinz, Micro-Macro Political Analysis:.Accents of Inquiry (Chicago, 1969), 3.Google Scholar

21. Pryor, Frederic L., Public Expenditures in Communist and Capitalist Nations (New Haven, 1968), 312.Google Scholar

22. Pryor, 35, 83.

23. Pryor, 130.

24. Aaron, Henry, “Social Security: International Comparisons,” Eckstein, O., ed., in Studies in the Economics of Income Maintenance (Washington, D.C., 1967), 1348.Google Scholar

25. Flora, Peter and Alber, Jens, “Modernizations, Democratization, and the Development of Welfare States in Western Europe,” in Flora, P. and Hiedenheimer, A., eds., The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America (New Brunswick and London, 1981), 3780.Google Scholar

26. Pryor, 165–67.

27. Gough, Ian, The Political Economy of the Welfare State (London, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Parkin, Frank, Class inequality and Social Order (London, 1971).Google Scholar

28. Kumar, Krishan, “Pre-capitalist and Non-capitalist Factors in the Development of Capitalism: Fred Hirsch and Joseph Schumpeter,” in Ellis, A. and Kumar, K., eds., Dilemmas of Liberal Democracies: Studies in Fred Hirsch's Social Limits to Growth (London, 1983).Google Scholar

29. Wilensky, Harold L., The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditure (Berkeley, 1975), 45.Google Scholar

30. Peacock, Alan T. and Wiseman, Jack, The Growth of Government Expenditure in the United Kingdom (London and New York, 1967, rev. ed.).Google Scholar

31. “Public Social Spending,” Financial Acts of the United Kingdom, 1930–1931 (Parliamentary Papers, London, 1932).Google Scholar

32. Johnson, Paul B., Land Fit for Heroes: The Planning of British Reconstruction, 1916–1919 (Chicago, 1968)Google Scholar, and Burk, Kathleen, ed., War and the State: The Transformation of British Government, 1914–1919 (London and Boston, 1982).Google Scholar

33. Pocock, 18.

34. Dunn, John, “The Identity of the History of Ideas,” Phibsophy 43 (1968), 92.Google Scholar

35. Collini, Stephan, Liberalism and Socialism: L T. Hobhouse and Political Argument in England, 1880–1914 (Cambridge, 1979), 111.Google Scholar

36. Rimlinger, Gaston, Welfare Policy and Industrialization in Europe, American and Russia (New York, 1971).Google Scholar

37. Mommsen, W. J., ed., The Emergence of the Welfare State in Britain and Germany (London, 1981).Google Scholar

38. Jones, Gareth S., “From Historical Sociology to Theoretical History,” British Journal of Sociology 27 (1976), 295305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39. Strawson, P. F., “Social Morality and Individual Man,” Philosophy 36 (1961), 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

40. Finer, Samuel, The Life and Times of Sir Edwin Chadwick (London, 1952).Google Scholar

41. Burns, Eveline, British Unemployment Programs, 1920–1938 (Washington, 1941), 5761.Google Scholar

42. Newton-Smith, W. and Lukes, Steven, “The Underdetermination of Theory by Data,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 52 (1978), 92107.Google Scholar

43. Simon, Brian, Education and the Labour Movement, 1870–1920 (London, 1965).Google Scholar

44. Harrison, Royden, Before the Socialists: Studies in Labour and Politics, 1861—1881 (London, 1965).Google Scholar

45. Rathbone, Eleanor, The Disinherited Family (London, 1924).Google Scholar

46. Macinol, John, The Movement for Family Allowances, 1918–1945: A Study in Social Policy Development (London, 1980).Google Scholar

47. Ceccaldi, Dominique, Histoire des prestations familiales en France (Paris, 1951).Google Scholar

48. Duroselle, Jean-Baptiste, Les Defeats du Catholicisme sociale en France jusqu'en 1870 (Paris, 1951)Google Scholar, and Scott, John, Republican Ideas and the Liberal Tradition in France, 1870–1914 (New York, 1966).Google Scholar

49. LaCapra, Dominick, Emile Durkheim: Sociologist and Philosopher (Ithaca, 1972), 59.Google Scholar

50. Dansette, Adrian, Histoire religieuse de la France contemporaine (Paris, 1951), 312.Google Scholar

51. Smith, Robert J., The Ecole Normale Superieure and the Third Republic (Albany, 1982)Google Scholar, and Herr, Daniel and Meyer, Pierre-Andre, Lucien Herr: Le Sodalisme et son destin (Paris, 1977).Google Scholar

52. Auspitz, Katherine, The Radical Bourgeoisie: The Ligue de I'Enseignement and the Origins of the Third Republic, 1866–1885 (Cambridge, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Kent, Christopher, Brains and Numbers: Elitism, Comtism, and Democracy in Mid-Victorian Britain (Toronto, 1978).Google Scholar

53. Durbin, Elizabeth, New jerusalems: The Labour Party and the Economics of Democratic Socialism (London and Boston, 1985).Google Scholar

54. Ullmann, H. P.. “German Industry and Bismarck's Social Security System,” in Mommsen, W. J., ed., The Emergence of the Welfare State in Britain and Germany (London, 1981), 133–49.Google Scholar

55. Verney, Douglas, “The Swift Rise and Fall of Swedish Liberalism,” Political Studies 20 (1972), 4259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

56. Quoted from Hamer, D. A., Liberal Politics in the Age of Gladstone and Rosebery (Oxford, 1972)Google Scholar, in Barker, Michael, Gladstone and Radicalism (New York, 1975), 55.Google Scholar For the full account of the terrible toll of Ireland on the Liberal Party, see the account by one of Gladstone's admirers, Hammond, J. L., Gladstone and the Irish Nation (1972–1949) (Hamden, CT, 1964; originally published in London, 1938).Google Scholar

57. Braithwaite, William J., Lloyd George's Ambulance Wagon, Bunbury, Sir Henry N., ed. (London, 1957). This is a very passionate account of the negotiations in passing the 1911 National Insurance Act by a young civil servant devoted to Lloyd George who was in charge of talks with the Friendly Societies. Through a misunderstanding Lloyd George became convinced that Braithwaite was dishonest. He wrote the book twenty years later to vindicate himself, although his civil-service career was ruined. Sir Henry edited and republished the book later.Google Scholar

58. Collini, 134.

59. Collini, 97.

60. Richter, Melvin, The Politics of Consensus: T. H. Green and His Age (London, 1964), 312.Google Scholar

61. LePlay, M. F., La Reforme sociale en France, 2 vols. (Paris, 1846).Google Scholar

62. Lindenberg, Daniel, Le Marxisme introuvable (Paris, 1975)Google Scholar, and Logue, William, From Philosophy to Sociology: The Evolution of French Liberalism, 1870–1914 (Dekalb, 1983).Google Scholar

63. Logue, 53.

64. Lukes, Steven, Emile Durkheim: His Life and Times: A Historical and Critical Study (London, 1973), 45.Google Scholar

65. Hayward, J. E. S., “Solidarity and the Reformist Sociology of Alfred Fouillée,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 22 (January and April 1963), 205–21, 303–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

66. Skocpol, Theda, “Political Response to Capitalist Crisis: New-Marxist Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal,” The Radical History Review 10 (1980), 155201. There is a contradiction between her sympathy for a class interpretation of the New Deal and the very upper-class, agrarian mix of the New Deal government which originates in the failure to clearly demarcate state from society.Google Scholar

67. Collini, 14.

68. Koblik, Steven, ed., Sweden's Development from Poverty to Affluence, 1750–1970 (Minneapolis, 1975).Google Scholar

69. Newton-Smith and Lukes, 97.

70. Storking, George W., “On the Limits of Presentism and Historicism in the Historiography of the Behavioral Sciences,” in Race, Culture, and Evolution: Essays in Anthropology (New York, 1968), 8.Google Scholar