Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:13:58.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Cultures of Science: The Limits of Positivism Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2009

Irving Louis Horowitz
Irving Louis Horowitz
Affiliation:
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Were it not linguistically awkward, I would be inclined to entitle these remarks a discourse on what went wrong with the love affair of policy-makers, academic pundits, and hard-core positivists with the world of science. In the nineteenth century, science was as identified with progress as bacon is with eggs. This optimism has given way to a pandemic mistrust of science by all sorts of elites. Popular displeasure became transparently evident in the waning decades of the twentieth century. Mistrust of science has only deepened in the first years of the new millennium. The ease with which scientific products are converted into destructive weaponry only partially accounts for the new skepticism about conventional claims. Unanticipated negative human consequences of actual discoveries in areas ranging from genetic engineering to wireless communication are at least as important an element in popular concerns. Nonetheless, professional assertions about the benefits of science continue unabated. Peter Watson in his fine recent survey, The Modern Mind, in which he asserts science as such “provides a new kind of humanity and a canon for life as it is now lived,” typifies these claims. The limitation in this by no means unusual formulation is that few people are actually involved in the life of science, while many are affected by applications of scientific work that often have indeterminate or, even worse, destructive consequences.

Type
Critical Perspectives
Information
Journal of Policy History , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 2004 , pp. 332 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Watson, Peter, The Modern Mind: An Intellectual History of the Twentieth Century (New York, 2001), 503Google Scholar.

2. Keller, Evelyn Fox, Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines (Cambridge, Mass., 2002), 299Google Scholar.

3. Strathern, Paul, Mendeleyev's Dream: The Quest for the Elements (New York, 2000), 3–4Google Scholar.

4. Gribbin, John, Schrodinger's Kittens and the Search for Reality: Solving the Quantum Mysteries (Boston, 1995), 28–30Google Scholar.

5. Snow, C. P., The Two Cultures, introduction by Stefan Collini (1959) (Cambridge, 1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6. Leavis, F. R. with Yudkin, Michael, “Two Cultures? The Significance of C. P. Snow,” in Essays and Documents, ed. MacKillop, Ian and Stover, Richard (London, 1996)Google Scholar.

7. de Sola Pool, Ithiel, in Politics in Wired Nations, ed. Etheredge, Lloyd S. (New Brunswick, N.J., 1997)Google Scholar.

8. Dyson, Freeman, Imagined Worlds (Cambridge, Mass., 1997)Google Scholar.

9. Gribbin, John and Gribbin, Mary, Richard Feynman: A Life in Science (New York, 1997), 281–282Google Scholar.

10. Sakharov, Andrei, Memoirs (New York, 1990), 164–167Google Scholar.

11. Horowitz, Irving Louis, “The Politics of Physiological Psychology,” Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 28, no. 2 (04–06 1993): 17–25Google ScholarPubMed.

12. Todorov, Tzvetan, “Totalitarianism: Between Religion and Science,” in Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, ed. Talmon, J. L., Rotenstreich, Nathan, and Arieli, Yehoshua (London, 2001), 141–144Google Scholar.

13. Kitcher, Philip, “Well-Ordered Science,” in Science, Truth, and Democracy (New York, 2002)Google Scholar.

14. Kennedy, Donald, “On Science at a Crossroads,” Daedalus: Journal of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences 131, no. 3 (Summer 2002): 122–126Google Scholar.

15. Gould, Stephen Jay, Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History (New York, 1989), esp. 259–263Google Scholar.

16. Davies, Paul, God and the New Physics (New York, 1983), 228–229Google Scholar.