Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:55:28.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thinking Big: Can National Values or Class Factions Explain the Development of Social Provision in the United States?: A Review Essay

Review products

LevineDaniel, Poverty and Society: The Growth of the American Welfare State in International Comparison (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1988).
QuadagnoJill, The Transformation of Old Age Security: Class and Politics in the American Welfare State (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

Theda Skocpol
Theda Skocpol
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Thinking big about the development of social policies in the United States has become fashionable. Until recently, occasional comprehensive histories of social provision in America focused on single periods of reform ferment, such as the Progressive Era, or the New Deal, or the Great Society. Then, James T. Patterson's 1981 book America's Struggle Against Poverty, 1900–1980, and Michael B. Katz's 1986 book In the Shadow of the Poorhouse: A Social History of Welfare in America, provided overviews of American attitudes toward poverty and attempts to do something about it from the nineteenth century to the present. These authors were clearly perplexed by the devolution of the antipoverty efforts of the War on Poverty and the Great Society into the political stalemates of the late 1970s and the conservative backlashes of the 1980s. Their books seem to be trying to use rich descriptive overviews of the past to gain some perspective on where American “welfare reforms” might go in the future.

Type
Review Article
Information
Journal of Policy History , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , October 1990 , pp. 425 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Patterson, James T., America's Struggle Against Poverty, 1900–1980 (Cambridge, Mass., 1981)Google Scholar; and Katz, Michael B., In the Shadow of the Poorhouse: A Social History of Welfare in America (New York, 1986).Google Scholar

2. For a recent review of this literature, see Skocpol, Theda and Amenta, Edwin, “States and Social Policies,” Annual Review of Sociology 12 (1986): 131–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Rimlinger, Gaston, Welfare Policy and Industrialization in Europe, America, and Russia (New York, 1971).Google Scholar

4. My comments here, as well as the empirical criticisms of Quadagno and Levine, draw upon Theda Skocpol, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Politics of Social Provision in the United States, 1870s–1920s (forthcoming from Harvard University Press). See also my articles: “‘Why Not Equal Protection?’: Explaining the Politics of Public Social Spending in Britain, 1900–1911, and the United States, 1880s–1920” (with Ann Shola Orloff), American Sociological Review 49 (6) (December 1984): 726–50; “Did Capitalists Shape Social Security?” (with Edwin Amenta), American Sociological Review 50(4) (August 1985): 572–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and “The Politics of Unemployment Insurance in Five American States” (with Amenta, Edwin, Clemens, Elisabeth, Olsen, Jefren, and Parikh, Sunita), Studies in American Political Development 2 (1987): 137–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. The advantages of a historical-institutional approach are discussed and exemplified in Weir, Margaret, Orloff, Ann Shola, and Skocpol, Theda, eds., The Politics of Social Policy in the United States (Princeton, 1988).Google Scholar