No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 October 2011
The recent flood of books on the failures of the European social democratic parties in the 1980s suggests that since the turn of the century the democratic left failed to see political opportunities provided by the growth of the welfare state. Two factors make the apparent political oversight of particular interest. First, the historical sequence of enlarging benefits and programs was remarkably similar across countries. Second, early in their development the social democratic left developed fairly detailed policy initiatives for the economy but had much less detailed proposals for social policies and programs. Broadly speaking, the left usually perceived social programs and policies as marginally important instruments for macrosocial change in income redistribution and transfer of wealth but of little political importance. These tendencies are most apparent in the postwar construction of national welfare states but are visible at various critical junctures in political decisionmaking since 1900.
1. Among the many recent publications lamenting the decline of social democracy, see Marquand, David, The Unprincipled Society: New Demands and Old Politics (London, 1988)Google Scholar; Singer, David, Is Socialism Doomed? The Meaning of Mitterrand (New York and Oxford, 1988)Google Scholar; Koeble, Thomas A., The Left Unraveled: Social Democracy and the New Left in Germany (Durham N.C., 1991);Google ScholarScharpf, Fritz, Crisis and Choice in European Social Democracy (Ithaca, 1991)Google Scholar; Przeworski, Adam and Sprague, John, Paper Stones (Chicago, 1986);Google ScholarGorz, André, Adieu au proletariat (Paris, 1988).Google Scholar
2. See Flora, Peter and Alber, Jens, “Modernization, Democratization, and the Development of Welfare States in Europe,” in Flora, Peter and Heidenheimer, Arnold, eds., The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America (New Brunswick, 1981), 37–80.Google Scholar
3. Ashford, Douglas E., The Emergence of the Welfare States (Oxford and New York, 1986).Google Scholar
4. On the long-term development of ideas in Sweden, see in particular Tilton, Timothy, The Political Theory of Swedish Social Democracy: Through the Welfare State to Socialism (Oxford, 1990)Google Scholar. An important qualification noting the difficulties of the process is Higgins, Winton, “Ernst Wigforss: The Renewal of Social Democratic Thought and Practice,” in Zeitlen, M., ed., Political Power and Social Theory (Greenwich, Conn., 1985).Google Scholar
5. See Oualid, William and Picquenard, Charles, Salaires et tarifs, conventions et grèves: La politique du Ministère de l'Armement et du Ministère du Travail (Paris and New York, 1928).Google Scholar
6. On the financial politics of the period, see Jeanneney, J. N., Leçons d'histoire pour une gauche au pouvoir: La faillité du Cartel (1924–1926) (Paris, 1977).Google Scholar
7. Pimlott, Ben, Hugh Dalton (London, 1985), 221–24.Google Scholar
8. Wright, Anthony, G. D. H. Cole and Socialist Democracy (Oxford, 1979).Google Scholar
9. On Mounier, see Winock, Michel, Histoire politique de la Revue “Esprit,” 1930–1950 (Paris, 1975);Google Scholar and on the collapse of the Catholic left, Letamendia, Pierre, Le M. R. P., Thèse pour le Doctorat d'Etat, University of Bordeaux, 1975.Google Scholar
10. For an impassioned account, see Bauchard, Phillipe, Les technocrates et le pouvoir: χcrise, CGT, clubs (Paris, 1966).Google Scholar
11. See Douglas E. Ashford, Social Democratic Visions: Interpretations of the Postwar Welfare States (Pittsburgh, forthcoming).
12. Baldwin, Peter, The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State, 1875–1975 (New York, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. See Critchlow, Donald T. and Hawley, Ellis W., eds., Federal Social Policy: The Historical Dimension (University Park, Pa., 1988)Google Scholar, especially chapter 4 by Brian Balogh, “Securing Support: The Emergence of the Social Security Board as a Political Actor, 1935—1939,” 55–78, on the politics of assistance versus pensions. See also Nash, Gerald D., Pubach, Noel H., and Tomasson, Richard F., eds., Social Security: The First Half Century (Albuquerque, 1988)Google Scholar; and Derthick, Martha, The Social Security Administration (Washington, D.C., 1990).Google Scholar
14. Briggs, Asa, “The Welfare State in Historical Perspective,” Acta Sociologica 2 (1961): 221–58.Google Scholar
15. Peacock, Alan and Wiseman, Jack, The Growth of Governmental Expenditures in the United Kingdom, rev. ed. (London, 1967). Ashford, The Emergence of the Welfare States, 26, finds Treasury evidence that nearly all these postwar increases are in fact attributable to prewar legislation.Google Scholar
16. Crosland, Anthony, The Future of Socialism (London, 1956).Google Scholar
17. Rosanvallon, Pierre, Le moment Guizot (Paris, 1985).Google Scholar
18. See Roberts, B. C., The Trades Union Congresses, 1868–1921 (Cambridge, 1958)Google Scholar; and Brown, Kenneth D., John Burns (London, 1977). John Brown was one of the first Labour ministers and chairman of the Local Government Board in the 1906 Lib-Lab government. He was famous for organizing the London matchgirls and strongly opposed assistance for the undeserving poor.Google Scholar
19. Mitchell, Allan, The Divided Path: The German Influence on Social Reform in France after 1870 (Chapel Hill, 1991). Although France did adopt an occupationally-based social security system, it never incorporated the class distinctions that made social security controversial in Germany.Google Scholar
20. The ateliers were spontaneously organized workshops of French socialists and caused the republicans much worry. See Agulhon, Maurice, The Republican Experiment, 1848–1852 (Cambridge, 1983).Google Scholar
21. Ceccaldi, Dominique, Histoire des prestations familiales en France (Paris, 1981).Google Scholar
22. Both Beveridge and Bevin worried that child allowances would upset collective bargaining and the wage market. See Rathbone, Eleanor, The Disinherited Family (London, 1928).Google Scholar
23. See Goff, Jacques Le, Du silence à la parole: Droit du travail, société, Etat (1830–1985 (Paris, 1985).Google Scholar
24. Millerand collected nearly all the moderate socialists who were unable to remain in the radicalized socialist party. See Derfler, Martin, Alexandre Millerand: The Socialist Years (The Hague, 1977).Google Scholar
25. Auspitz, Katherine, The Radical Bourgeoisie: The Ligue de l'Enseignement and the Origins of the Third Republic, 1866–1885 (Cambridge, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Ashford, Social Democratic Visions, forthcoming.
27. Parris, Henry, Constitutional Bureaucracy (London, 1969).Google Scholar
28. Keith-Lucas, Brian and Richards, Peter G., A History of Local Government in the Twentieth Century (London, 1978).Google Scholar
29. Dicey's book remained the standard work on the British Constitution into the 1920s. See Dicey, A. V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 9th ed. (London, 1939)Google Scholar. Many of the critiques of his juridical view are gathered in Friedmann, W., Law and Social Change in Contemporary Britain (London, 1951).Google Scholar
30. This critique begins with E. C. Wade in his introduction to A. V. Dicey's Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution.
31. In order to preserve parliamentary tax powers, from the earliest local reform legislation of 1835 to present, government has preferred grants over increased local tax powers. See Ashford, Douglas E., British Dogmatism and French Pragmatism: Center-Local Relations in the Welfare State (London and New York, 1982).Google Scholar
32. The Webb's eleven-volume history of British (English) local government was aimed at establishing the irrationality of the system, a view that was widely held by most high officials, including Labour party leaders after the war. See, for example, Sidney, and Webb, Beatrice, English Local Government: The Story of the King's Highway (London, 1913).Google Scholar
33. Levasseur, E., Histoire des classes ouvrières et de l'industrie en France, 1789–1870 (Paris, 1903).Google Scholar
34. Godsen, P. H. J. H., The Friendly Societies in England (Manchester, 1961). The Friendly Societies won the lucrative right to collect national insurance premiums in 1911, and their exclusion in 1948 was the subject of a serious cabinet committee debate.Google Scholar
35. Gilbert, Bentley C., The Evolution of National Insurance in Great Britain: The Origins of the Welfare State (London, 1966), 167.Google Scholar
36. Harris, Jose, Beveridge: A Biography (Oxford, 1977).Google Scholar
37. Pater, John E., The Making of the National Health Service (London, 1981).Google Scholar
38. Brown, John Burns.
39. Callaghan, James, “The Approach to Social Equality,” in Munro, D., ed., Socialism: The British Way (London, 1948), 127–41.Google Scholar
40. Ewald, François, L'Etat providence (Paris, 1986), sees the origins of the French welfare state in the labor compensation debates of the 1890s.Google Scholar
41. Derfler, Alexandre Millerand.
42. Catrice-Lorey, Antoinette, Dynamique interne de la securité sociale (Paris, 1981).Google Scholar
43. The Ministry of Labour was caught in the political crossfire in 1935. See Lowe, Rodney, Adjusting to Democracy: The Role of the Ministry of Labour in British Politics, 1916—1939 (Oxford, 1986). The poor were represented by the Ministry of Health, still responsible for local government. See Ashford, The Emergence of the Welfare States.Google Scholar
44. Pimlott, Hugh Dakon.
45. This was the solution uniformly advocated in a study of how to reconstruct the Labour party in the 1930s. See Addison, Christopher, ed., Problems of a Socialist Government (London, 1933). Addison, incidentally, was Lloyd-George's political agent from 1918 who was so rudely dismissed when Lloyd-George shifted to a Conservative party strategy.Google Scholar
46. Hatzfeld, Henri, Du pauperisme à la sécurité sociale: Essai sur les origines de la Sécurité Sociale (Paris, 1971).Google Scholar
47. Renouvin, P. and Rémond, R., eds., Léon Blum: Chef du Gouvernement (Paris, 1981).Google Scholar
48. Bauchard, Les technocrates et le pouvoir, 36–43.
49. Guy Desaunay, χ-Crise: Contributions à l'étude des idéologies économiques d'une groupe de polytechniciens durant le grand crise économique (1931–1939), Doctorat de troisième cycle (Paris, n. d.).
50. Bauchard, Les technocrates, 32–34.
51. A good summary of the situation is Bayle, Loubet del, Les nonconformistes des années 30 (Paris, 1987), 217–29.Google Scholar A much more critical account of the ideological confusion of the 1930s is Bourricaud, François, Le bricolage idéologique: Essai sur les intellectuels et les passions démocratiques (Paris, 1980).Google Scholar
52. Letamendia, Le M. R. P.
53. Vignaux, Paul, De la CFTC à le CFDT: Syndicalisme et socialisme: Reconstruction (1946–1972) (Paris, 1980).Google Scholar
54. Wright, G. D. H. Cole, 59.
55. Lewis, D. S., Illusions of Grandeur: Mosley, Fascism, and British Society (Manchester, 1987).Google Scholar
56. Tilton, Timothy, The Political Theory of Swedish Social Democracy: Through the Welfare State to Socialism (Oxford, 1990);Google Scholar and Rothstein, Bo, “Managing the Welfare State: Lessons from Gustav Möller,” Scandinavian Political Studies 3 (1985): 151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57. Childs, Marquis, Sweden: The Middle Way (New Haven, 1936).Google Scholar
58. Schiller, Bernd, “Years of Crisis, 1906–1914”, in Koblik, S., ed., Sweden's Development from Poverty to Affluence, 1750–1970 (Minneapolis, 1975).Google Scholar
59. Higgins, Winton, “Ernst Wigforss: The Renewal of Social Democratic Theory and Practice,” in Zeitlen, M., ed., Political and Social Theory (Greenwich, Conn., 1985).Google Scholar
60. Heclo, Hugh and Madsen, Henrik, Policy and Politics in Sweden (Philadelphia, 1987), 254–60.Google Scholar
61. Ibid., 207–32.
62. Ashford, Douglas E., ed., Discretionary Politics: Intergovernmental Social Transfers in Eight Countries (Greenwich, Conn., 1990).Google Scholar
63. Heclo and Madsen, Policy and Politics in Sweden, 160–64.
64. Sainsbury, Diana, ed., Democracy, State, and Justice (Stockholm, 1988).Google Scholar
65. Heclo and Madsen, Policy and Politics in Sweden, 260–64.
66. L'Année Métallurgique: 1976 (Paris, 1977), 102–4.Google Scholar
67. Ashford, Douglas E., “In Search of the Etat Providence,” in Hollifield, J. and Ross, G., eds., Searching for the New France (New York, 1991).Google Scholar
68. Financial Statistics (London, 1978).Google Scholar
69. Financial Statistics (London, 1986), 72.Google Scholar
70. Palme, Joakim, Pension Rights in Welfare Capitalism (Stockholm, 1990).Google Scholar
71. Scharpf, Crisis and Choice.
72. Heclo, Hugh, Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden (New Haven, 1974).Google Scholar
73. Hawkesworth, Mary, Theoretical Issues of Policy Analysis (Albany N.Y., 1988);Google Scholar and Smith, Lance de Haven, Philosophical Critiques of Policy Analysis: Lindblom, Habermas, and the Great Society (Gainesville, Fla., 1988).Google Scholar