Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:40:27.702Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The theory of ionizing shock waves in a magnetic field. Part 2. Transverse, normal and switch-off shock waves and the piston problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

M. A. Liberman  and
A. L. Velikovich
M. A. Liberman
Affiliation:
Institute for Physical Problems, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 117334 Moscow, Vorobyevskoye Shosse, 2 USSR
A. L. Velikovich
Affiliation:
Institute for Physical Problems, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 117334 Moscow, Vorobyevskoye Shosse, 2 USSR
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Solutions for transverse, normal and switch-off ionizing shock waves have been obtained on the basis of the general theory of ionizing shock waves in a magnetic field presented in part 1. Some details of the shock structure were considered at Pm → 0. In particular, the transition from the gasdynamic to the magnetohydrodynamic regime, while increasing the shock velocity, is traced in detail. The additional relationship, obtained in part 1, determines the value of a transverse electric field ahead of the front for the case of a transverse shock wave and for normal and switch-off shock waves, if the latter are shock waves of type 3. In the case of normal and switch-off shock waves of type 4, basic relationship obtained in part 1 is not a boundary condition, but determines the position of a viscous isomagnetic jump in the shock structure. The transition of ionizing shock waves from the GD to the MHD regime, while increasing the shock velocity, was considered. The width of such a transition on shock velocity scale depends significantly on the intensity of precursor photo-ionization. In particular, this transition occurs slowly at zero precursor photo-ionization: the electric field ahead of the front tends to zero as l/vxo when vxo increases. The problem of formation of ionizing shock waves ahead of a magnetic piston and a conducting piston with a magnetic field directed along the normal to the piston surface has been solved. We indicate the set of flow parameters, for which Chapman-Jouguet's model of ionizing front motion ahead of the piston is inapplicable. A transition from the Chapman-Jouguet regime to the MHD one is considered.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , August 1981 , pp. 55 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akhiezer, A. I., Akhiezer, I. A., Polovin, R. V., Sitenko, A. G. & Stepanov, K. N. 1974. Electrodynamics of Plasma. Moscow.Google Scholar
Chu, C. K. 1964 Phys. Fluids, 7, 1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, C. K. & Gross, R. A. 1969 Advances in Plasma Physics, vol. 1, 2 (ed. Simon, A. and Thompson, W. B.). Interscience.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, A. & Taniuti, T. 1964 Non-linear wave propagation. Academic.Google Scholar
Kemp, N. H. & Petschek, H. E. 1959 Phys. Fluids, 2, 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunkel, W. B. & Gross, R. A. 1962 Plasma Hydrodynamics. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, B. P. 1970 Phys. Fluids, 13, 833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, B. P. 1972 a J. Plasma Phys. 7, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, B. P. 1972 b J. Plasma Phys. 7, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, B.P. 1973 J. Plasma Phys. 10, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, B. P. 1977 J. Plasma Phys. 17, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, M. A. 1978 Soviet Phys. JETP, 48, 832.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. A. 1979 a Uspekhi Fiz. Nauk, 127, 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, M. A. 1979 b Soviet Phys. JETP, 50, 63.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. A., Synach, V. S., Velikovich, A. L. & Zakajdakhov, V. V. 1980 Plasma Phys. 22, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, M. A. & Velikovich, A. L. 1978 Plasma Phys. 20, 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, M. A. & Velikovich, A. L. 1981 J. Plasma Phys. 26, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roikhvarger, Z. B. & Syrovatskii, S. I. 1974 Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz., 66, 1338.Google Scholar
Stebbins, C. F. & Vlases, G. C. 1968 J. Plasma Phys. 2, 633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taussig, R. T. 1965 Phys. Fluids, 8, 1616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velikovich, A. L. & Liberman, M. A. 1977 Soviet Phys. JETP, 46, 469.Google Scholar
Velikovich, A. L. & Liberman, M. A. 1978 Soviet Phys. JETP, 47, 860.Google Scholar
Velikovich, A. L. & Liberman, M. A. 1979 Uspekhi Fiz. Nauk, 129, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar