Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T14:25:21.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stability of relativistic transverse cold plasma waves Part 1. Circularly polarized waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

F. J. Romeiras
F. J. Romeiras
Affiliation:
Centro de Eloctrodinâmica, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisboa-1, Portugal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the stability against small perturbations of a certain class of nonlinear wave solutions of the equations that describe a cold unmagnetized electron–ion plasma. These nonlinear waves are of fixed profile, superluminous, period.ic and transverse. The small perturbations are assumed to propagate in the same direction as the nonlinear wave. A Lagrangian method is used to derive the perturbation equations. The analysis is carried out in the frame where the nonlinear waves are space independent and then the results Lorentz transformed to the laboratory frame. Part 1 refers to circularly polarized waves. In this case it is possible to integrate the equations and obtain an algebraic dispersion relation in the form of an eighth order polynomial equation in the frequency. The analytical and numerical solution of this equation, for a wide range of variation of the parameters involved, reveals the existence of a very unstable mode. Particular attention is given to very large wave amplitudes for which the plasma behaves like an electron–positron plasma; in this case the growth rate of the unstable mode can be as high as the frequency of the nonlinear wave.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , December 1978 , pp. 479 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akhiezer, A. I. & Polovin, R. V. 1956 Soviet Phys. JETP, 3, 696.Google Scholar
Clemmow, P. C. 1974 J. Plasma Phys. 12, 297.Google Scholar
Dobrowolny, M.Ferrari, A. & Bosia, G. 1976 Plasma Phys. 18, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrowolny, J. P. 1970 J. Plasma Phys. 4, 761.Google Scholar
Grant, J. A. & Hitchins, G. D. 1971 JIMA, 8, 122.Google Scholar
Infeld, E. & Rowlands, G. 1973 J. Plasma Phys. 10, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jancarik, J. & Tsytovich, V. N. 1973 Nucl. Fusion, 13, 807.Google Scholar
Kennel, C. F. & Pellat, R. 1976 J. Plasma Phys. 15, 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Max, C. E. 1973 a Phys. Fluids, 16, 1277.Google Scholar
Max, C. E. 1973 b Phys. Fluids, 16, 1480.Google Scholar
Max, C. E. & Perkins, F. 1972 Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1731.Google Scholar
Romeiras, F. J. 1977 Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Selby, S. M. (Ed.) 1972 Standard Mathematical Tables. The Chemical Rubber Co. Press, Cleveland, Ohio.Google Scholar
Sturrock, P. A. 1958 Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 4, 306.Google Scholar
Sweemey, G. S. S. & Stewart, P. 1975 Astron. & Astrophys., 41, 431.Google Scholar