Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:25:42.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pump fluctuation effects on parametric instabilities in plasmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

Ahmed H. Belbachir
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
A. Ziya Akcasu
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the effect of stochastic pumps on the parametric instabilities, including the pump band-width effect, the effect of the frequency mismatch and of the plasma temperature fluctuations that are induced by the fluctuations in the pump itself. Contrary to what is found in the literature, the threshold for instability can initially decrease with increasing pump band-width and reach a minimum when these effects are included. We propose a physical explanation of this minimum and point out the relationship between the thresholds for the instability of the mean energy and mean amplitude of the wave. The pump amplitude and the resulting plasma temperature fluctuations compete with the pump band-width and decrease the threshold for instability. Even for large pump band-widths, the threshold for instability for a pump with fluctuating amplitude is always lower than for the coherent one. Our general conclusion is that, in studying the effect of stochastic pumps on parametric instabilities more realistically, one has to include, in addition to the pump band-width, a number of other phenomena like imperfect frequency matching, the fluctuations induced in plasma parameters and the amplitude fluctuations of the pump itself.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barbiere, D. 1951 Phys. Rev. 84, 653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belbachir, A.-H. 1981 Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Bers, A. & Reiman, A. 1975 Proceedings of 7th Conference on Numerical Simulation of Plasmas, Courant Institute, p. 192.Google Scholar
Bondeson, A. 1977 Physica Scripta, 15, 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, J. C. 1963 Am. J. Phys. 31, 905.Google Scholar
Brissand, A. & Frish, U. 1974 J. Math. Phys. 15, 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desloge, E. A. & Matthysse, S. W. 1960 Am. J. Phys. 28, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laval, G., Pellat, R. & Pesme, D. 1976 Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumato, K., Takamura, S. & Okuda, T. 1978 Phys. Lett. G4A, 395.Google Scholar
Mizurno, K. & Degroot, J. S. 1977 Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obenschain, S. P., Luhmann, N. C. & Greiling, P. T. 1976 Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1309.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. J. 1975 Nucl. Fusion, 15, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valeo, E. J. & Oberman, C. R. 1973 Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1035.Google Scholar
Ware, K. D. 1968 PhD. Thesis, University of Michigan.Google Scholar