Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:17:21.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Progress in laser acceleration of particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2012

Chan Joshi ,
Wei Lu  and
Zhengming Sheng
Chan Joshi
Affiliation:
UCLA, USA
Wei Lu
Affiliation:
Tsinghua University, China
Zhengming Sheng
Affiliation:
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Laser acceleration of particles is currently a very active area of research in Plasma Physics, with an emphasis on acceleration of electrons and ions using short but intense laser pulses. In this special issue we access the current status of this field by inviting leading researchers all over the world to contribute their original works here. Many of these results were first presented at the recent Laser-Particle Acceleration Workshop (LPAW 2011) held in Wuzhen, China in June 2011. In addition to the laser wakefield acceleration (LWFA) of electrons (Tzoufras et al.) and laser acceleration of ions (Tsung et al.), there were exciting new proposals for a proton-driven plasma wakefield accelerator (Xia et al.) and for a dielectric-structure-based two-beam accelerator (Gai et al.) presented at this workshop, and we are very pleased to have the authors' contributions on these included here.

Type
Editorial
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 78 , Special Issue 4: Progress in Laser Acceleration of Particles , August 2012 , pp. 321 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

References

Antici, P., Migliorati, M., Mostacci, A., Picardi, L., Palumbo, L. and Ronsivalle, C. 2012 Sensitivity study in a compact accelerator for laser-generated protons. J. Plasma Phys. 78 (4), 441–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gai, W., Power, J. G. and Jing, C. 2012 Short-pulse dielectric two-beam acceleration. J. Plasma Phys. 78 (4), 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemos, N., Martins, J. L., Dias, J. M., Marsh, K. A., Pak, A. and Joshi, C. 2012 Forward directed ion acceleration in a LWFA with ionization-induced injection. J. Plasma Phys. 78 (4), 327–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotov, K. V. 2012 Optimum angle for side injection of electrons into linear plasma wakefields. J. Plasma Phys. 78 (4), 455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostermayr, T. et al. 2012 Laser plasma accelerator driven by a super-Gaussian pulse. J. Plasma Phys. 78 (4), 447–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsung, F., Tochitsky, S. Ya., Haberberger, D. J., Mori, W. B. and Joshi, C. 2012 CO2 Laser acceleration of forward directed MeV proton beams in a gas target at critical plasma density. J. Plasma Phys. 78 (4), 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzoufras, M., Huang, C., Cooley, J. H., Tsung, F. S., Vieira, J. and Mori, W. B. 2012 Simulations of efficient laser wakefield accelerators from 1 to 100 GeV. J. Plasma Phys. 78 (4), 401–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, G. H., Wiggins, S. M., Issac, R. C., Brunetti, E., Manahan, G. G., Islam, M. R., Cipiccia, S., Aniculaesei, C., Ersfeld, B. and Jaroszynski, D. A. 2012 High resolution electron beam measurements on the ALPHA-X laser–plasma wakefield accelerator. J. Plasma Phys. 78 (4), 393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X. et al. 2012 Self-injected petawatt laser-driven plasma electron acceleration in 1017 cm−3 plasma. J. Plasma Phys. 78 (4), 413–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W.-M., Sheng, Z.-M., Kawata, S., Zheng, C.-Y., Li, Y.-T., Chen, L.-M., Dong, Q.-L., Lu, X., Ma, J.-L. and Zhang, J. 2012 Towards Sub-TeV electron beams driven by ultra-short, ultra-intense laser pulses. J. Plasma Phys. 78 (4), 461–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, G., Assmann, R., Fonseca, R. A., Huang, C., Mori, W., Silva, L. O., Vieira, J., Zimmermann, F. and Muggli, P. 2012 A proposed demonstration of an experiment of proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration based on CERN SPS. J. Plasma Phys. 78 (4), 347–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar