Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Liu, Yi-Hsin
Hesse, M.
Guo, F.
Daughton, W.
Li, H.
Cassak, P. A.
and
Shay, M. A.
2017.
Why does Steady-State Magnetic Reconnection have a Maximum Local Rate of Order 0.1?.
Physical Review Letters,
Vol. 118,
Issue. 8,
Che, H.
2017.
How anomalous resistivity accelerates magnetic reconnection.
Physics of Plasmas,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 8,
Cassak, P. A.
Liu, Y.-H.
and
Shay, M. A.
2017.
A review of the 0.1 reconnection rate problem.
Journal of Plasma Physics,
Vol. 83,
Issue. 5,
Boozer, Allen H.
2017.
Why is fast magnetic reconnection ubiquitous?.
Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids,
Vol. 172,
Issue. 9-10,
p.
704.
Janvier, Miho
2017.
Three-dimensional magnetic reconnection and its application to solar flares.
Journal of Plasma Physics,
Vol. 83,
Issue. 1,
McMahon, Liam C.
2017.
Visco-resistive length scale in flux pile-up and series solutions for magnetic reconnection.
Physics of Plasmas,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 5,
Comisso, L.
Lingam, M.
Huang, Y.-M.
and
Bhattacharjee, A.
2017.
Plasmoid Instability in Forming Current Sheets.
The Astrophysical Journal,
Vol. 850,
Issue. 2,
p.
142.
Comisso, Luca
and
Asenjo, Felipe A.
2018.
Collisionless magnetic reconnection in curved spacetime and the effect of black hole rotation.
Physical Review D,
Vol. 97,
Issue. 4,
Mohanty, P. K.
Arunbabu, K. P.
Aziz, T.
Dugad, S. R.
Gupta, S. K.
Hariharan, B.
Jagadeesan, P.
Jain, A.
Morris, S. D.
Nayak, P. K.
Rakshe, P. S.
Ramesh, K.
Rao, B. S.
Zuberi, M.
Hayashi, Y.
Kawakami, S.
Subramanian, P.
Raha, S.
Ahmad, S.
Oshima, A.
Shibata, S.
and
Kojima, H.
2018.
Was the cosmic ray burst detected by the GRAPES-3 muon telescope on 22 June 2015 caused by a transient weakening of the geomagnetic field or by an interplanetary anisotropy?.
Physical Review D,
Vol. 97,
Issue. 8,
Liu, Yi‐Hsin
Hesse, M.
Cassak, P. A.
Shay, M. A.
Wang, S.
and
Chen, L.‐J.
2018.
On the Collisionless Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection Rate.
Geophysical Research Letters,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 8,
p.
3311.
Boozer, Allen H.
2018.
Why fast magnetic reconnection is so prevalent.
Journal of Plasma Physics,
Vol. 84,
Issue. 1,
Matteucci, J.
Fox, W.
Bhattacharjee, A.
Schaeffer, D. B.
Moissard, C.
Germaschewski, K.
Fiksel, G.
and
Hu, S. X.
2018.
Biermann-Battery-Mediated Magnetic Reconnection in 3D Colliding Plasmas.
Physical Review Letters,
Vol. 121,
Issue. 9,
Boozer, Allen H.
2018.
Pivotal issues on relativistic electrons in ITER.
Nuclear Fusion,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 3,
p.
036006.
Zhao, Tian-Le
Ni, Lei
Lin, Jun
and
Ziegler, Udo
2018.
Numerical studies of the Kelvin-Hemholtz instability in a coronal jet.
Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 4,
p.
045.
Muñoz, P. A.
and
Büchner, J.
2018.
Kinetic turbulence in fast three-dimensional collisionless guide-field magnetic reconnection.
Physical Review E,
Vol. 98,
Issue. 4,
Di Vita, Andrea
2018.
On super-elastic collisions between magnetized plasmoids in the heliosphere.
The European Physical Journal D,
Vol. 72,
Issue. 1,
Makwana, Kirit D.
Keppens, Rony
and
Lapenta, Giovanni
2018.
Study of magnetic reconnection in large-scale magnetic island coalescence via spatially coupled MHD and PIC simulations.
Physics of Plasmas,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 8,
Baty, Hubert
2019.
FINMHD: An Adaptive Finite-element Code for Magnetic Reconnection and Formation of Plasmoid Chains in Magnetohydrodynamics.
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series,
Vol. 243,
Issue. 2,
p.
23.
Comisso, Luca
and
Sironi, Lorenzo
2019.
The Interplay of Magnetically Dominated Turbulence and Magnetic Reconnection in Producing Nonthermal Particles.
The Astrophysical Journal,
Vol. 886,
Issue. 2,
p.
122.
Loureiro, Nuno F.
and
Boldyrev, Stanislav
2020.
Nonlinear Reconnection in Magnetized Turbulence.
The Astrophysical Journal,
Vol. 890,
Issue. 1,
p.
55.