Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:55:23.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On reconnexion experiments and their interpertation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

P. J. Baum  and
A. Bratenahl
P. J. Baum
Affiliation:
Physics Department and Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Riverside, California 92521
A. Bratenahl
Affiliation:
Physics Department and Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Riverside, California 92521
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A number of reconnexion concepts and experiments are briefly reviewed in order to re-examine the present interpretation of these experiments. In particular, we offer explanations as to why some experiments appear to develop Petschek modes, tearing modes, or netural current sheets. The explanations require an understanding of the proper role of magnetic Reynolds numbers, the limits of the frozen-in concept, and the importance of natural importance of natural boundary conditions. We find that netural current sheets usually from in experiments with highly symmetrical (and therefore unnatural) boundary conditions. The classical tearing mode develops from perturbations of a neutral current sheet. In less constrained geometries multiple neutral points may appear but the classical tearing mode theory needs modification to explain these cases rigorously. A Petschek mode develops in even less constrained systems although the theoretical description is highly idealized. We offer explanations as to why some experimenters appear to find neutral current sheets in quadrupole fields and examine the usefulness of concepts derived from neutral current sheet theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , October 1977 , pp. 257 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alfvén, H. 1976 J. Geophys. Res. 81, 4019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alidieres, M., Aymar, R., Jourdan, P., Koechlin, F. & Samain, A. 1968 Plasma Phys. 10, 841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, O. A. & Kunkel, W. B. 1969 Phys. Fluids, 12, 2099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, P. J., Bratenahl, A. & White, R. S. 1973 a Phys. Fluids, 16, 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, P. J. & Pollack, J. 1973 b J. Appl. Phys. 44, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, P. J., Bratenahl, A., Kao, M. & White, R. S. 1973 c Phys. Fluids, 16, 1501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, P. J., Bratenhal, A. & White, R. Stephen 1973d Radio Sci. 8, 917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, P. J. & Bratenhal, A. 1974 a J. Plasma Phys. 11, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, P. J. & Bratenahl, A. 1974 b Phys. Fluids, 17, 1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, P. J. & Bratenhal, A. 1975 Plan. Space Sci. 23, 813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, P. J. & Bratenhal, A. 1976 a Solar Phys. 47, 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, P. J., Kamin, G. & Bratenahl, A. 1976 b Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 57, 998.Google Scholar
Birkhoff, G. 1950 Hydrodynamics, A Study in Logic, Fact and Similitude. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Biskamp, D. & Schindler, K. 1971 Plasma Phys. 13, 1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, H. A. B. 1963 Nucl. Fusion, 3, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdanov, S. Yu., Tokarevskaya, N. P., Frank, A. G. & Khodzhaev, A. Z. 1975 Sov. J. Plasma Phys. 1, 71.Google Scholar
Bratenahl, A. & Baum, P. J. 1976 a Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 46, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratenhal, A. & Baum, P. J. 1976 b Solar Phys. 47, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratenahl, A. & Yeates, C. M. 1970 Phys. Fluids, 13, 2696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratenahl, A. 1972 Report No. IGPP-UCR.72–4.Google Scholar
Crockett, G., Baum, P. J. & Bratenahl, A. 1976 Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 57, 998.Google Scholar
Falthammar, C. G. 1974 Space Science Reviews, 15, 803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, A. G. 1976 In Neutral Current Sheets in Plasmas (ed. Basov, N. G.). Proc. P. N. Lebedev Physics Institute, 74, 107. Consultants Bureau, N.Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankenthal, S., Carpenter, J. W., Olbert, S., Penhune, J. P., Siscoe, G. & Treve, Y. M. 1964 National Technical Information Service N65–14127, pp. 45–46.Google Scholar
Furth, H. P., Killeen, J. & Rosenbluth, M. N. 1963 Phys. Fluids, 6, 459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerlakh, N. I. & Syrovatskii, S. I. 1976 Neutral Current Sheets in Plasmas (ed. Basov, N. G.). Proc. P.N. Lebedev Physics Institute, 74, 73. Consultants Bureau.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, R. M. 1965 Solar and Stellar Magnetic Fields (ed. Lust, R.), p. 398. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Hones, E. W. Jr 1976 Solar Phys. 47, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantrowitz, A. R. & Petschek, H. E. 1966 In Plasma Physics in Theory and Application (ed. Kunkel, W. B.). N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kennel, C. F. 1975 Comments on Astrophys. and Space Phys. 6, 71.Google Scholar
Lorrain, P. & Corson, D. 1970 Electromagnetic Fields and Waves, 2nd ed., pp. 305, 313. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Ohyabu, N., Okamura, S. & Kawashima, N. 1974 Phys. Fluids, 17, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohyabu, N. & Kawashima, N. 1972 J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 33, 496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petschek, H. E. 1964 NASA SP-50, p. 425. U.S. Govt. Printing Office.Google Scholar
Priest, E. R. 1976 Solar Phys. 47, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, C. T. 1974 Correlated Interplanetary and Magnetospheric Observations (ed. Page, D. E.), p. 3. D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rust, D. M. 1976 Solar Phys. 47, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturrock, P. A., Baum, P. J., Beckers, J. M., Newman, C. R., Priest, E. R., Rosenberg, H., Smith, D. F. & Wentzel, D. G. 1976 Solar Phys. 46, 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syrovatskii, S. I. 1971 Soviet Phys. JETP, 33, 933.Google Scholar
Syrovatskii, S. I., 1976 In Neutral Current Sheets in Plasmas (ed. Basov, N. G.). Proc. P.N. Lebedev. Physics. Institute 74, 1. Consultants Bureau, N.Y.Google Scholar
Tomozov, V. M. 1971 Sov. Astron. 15, 437.Google Scholar
Van Hoven, G. 1976 Solar Phys. 49, 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasyliunas, V. M. 1975 Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 13, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, T. & Axford, W. I. 1970 J. Plasma Phys. 4, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zvereva, A. M. & Severny, A. B. 1970 Izv. Krym. Astrofiz. Obs. 41–42, 97 (trans. AFCRL 71–0605, no. 95).Google Scholar