Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:07:30.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nonlinear Rayleigh-Taylor instability in hydromagnetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

B. B. Chakraborty ,
A. R. Nayak  and
H. K. S. Iyengar
B. B. Chakraborty
Affiliation:
Mathematics Section, Department of Chemical Technology, Bombay University, Matunga, Bombay-400 019, India
A. R. Nayak
Affiliation:
Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Bombay-400 085, India
H. K. S. Iyengar
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Patkar College, Bombay-400 062, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nonlinear Rayleigh-Taylor instability of a heavy, infinitely conducting fluid, supported against gravity by a uniform magnetic field in the vacuum, is studied for three-dimensional disturbances using the method of multiple time-scales. The three-dimensional problem can be reduced to two dimensions as it is found that an instability present for a three-dimensional disturbance of a given wavelength, for a given equilibrium magnetic field, is also present for a two-dimensional disturbance of the same wavelength propagating along an equilibrium magnetic field of lower strength. The instability is studied for both standing and progressive waves. Although in the linear stability problem the instability growth rate for a progressive wave of a given wavelength is equal to that for a stationary wave of the same wavelength, in the nonlinear instability problem studied here these waves are found to have different growth rates. Our results are compared and contrasted with those for the two-dimensional instability problem studied earlier.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , October 1983 , pp. 193 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Book, D. L., Ott, E. & Sulton, A. L. 1974 Phys. Fluids, 17, 696.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, B. B. & Jindia, R. K. 1971 ZAMM, 51, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, R. L. & Tankin, R. S. 1973 Phys. Fluids, 16, 1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalra, G. L. & Kathuria, S. N. 1976 J. Plasma Phys. 15, 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruskal, M. & Schwarzschild, M. 1954 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 223, 348.Google Scholar
Nayfeh, A. H. 1969 J. Fluid Mech. 39, 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayfeh, A. H. 1973 Perturbation Methods. Wiley.Google Scholar
Shivamoggi, B. K. 1982 J. Plasma Phys. 27, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, H. B. 1933 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 142, 621.Google Scholar