Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:03:37.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nonlinear development of the plasma-beam instability in a magnetized plasma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

Takashi Yamamoto
Affiliation:
Geophysics Research Laboratory, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113, Japan

Abstract

The nonlinear development of a plasma-mean system immersed in a static magnetic field B0 is investigated. The beam electrons are assumed to be streaming parallel to the direction of B0 and have a spread in the perpendicular component of the velocity. We restrict our consideration to the P instabilities which result in growing whistler waves aligned in a direction parallel to that of B0. Scaled equations describing the time evolution of these instabilities are derived under the assumptions that the beam density is small and that the resulting whistler wave is nearly sinusoidal. The perturbation of the perpendicular component of the electron velocity during the interaction can be excluded from the equation determining the wave dynamics, and then these scaled equations can be reduced to the simpler ones amenable to numerical solution which depends analytically on all the basic parameters of the problem. This solution shows that the amplitude of an unstable whistler wave first increases at the linear growth rate until the electrons are trapped and then, after overshooting, it approaches a steady state. The time evolution of the amplitude does not show an oscillation with a constant period; this results from the phase mixing enhanced by the spread in perpendicular velocities of the beam electrons.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bell, T. F. & Helliwell, R. A. 1971 J. Geophys. Res. 76, 8414.Google Scholar
Coroniti, F. V., Fredricks, R. W., Kennel, C. F. & Scharf, F. L. 1971 J. Geophys. Res. 76, 2366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, W. E., Malmberg, J. E., O'neil, T. M. & Thompson, J. R. 1970 Phys. Fluids, 13, 2422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helliwell, R. A. 1965 Whistlers and Related Ionospheric Phenomena. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Karpman, V. I., Istomin, Ja. N. & Shklyar, D. R. 1974 Planet. Space Sci. 22, 859.Google Scholar
Lampe, M. & Sprangle, P. 1975 Phys. Fluids, 18, 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsiborko, N. G., Onishckenko, I. N., Shapiro, V. D. & Shevchenko, V. I. 1972 Plasma Phys. 14, 591.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, H., Hashimoto, K. & Kimura, I. 1974 J. Geomag. Geoelectr. 26, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neufeld, J. & Wright, H. 1964 Phys. Rev. 135, 1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'neil, T. M. 1965 Phys. Fluids, 8, 2255.Google Scholar
O'neil, T. M., Winfrey, J. H. & Malmberg, J. H. 1971 Phys. Fluids, 14, 1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmadesso, P. & Schmidt, G. 1971 Phys. Fluids, 14, 1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roux, A., Gendrin, R., Wehrlin, N., Pellat, R. & Welti, R. 1973 J. Geophys. Res. 78, 3176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudan, R. N. & Ott, E. 1971 J. Geophys. Res. 76, 4463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehrlin, N., Gendrin, R., Roux, A. & Welti, R. 1973 J. Geophys. Res. 78, 763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, T. 1976 Plasma Phys. (in press).Google Scholar