Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:21:29.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic structure of ionizing shock waves Part 1. Skew shocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

B. P. Leonard
Affiliation:
Division of Pure and Applied Sciences, Richmond College, City University of New York, Staten Island, New York

Abstract

Initially non-conducting gas is ionized by a thin viscous shock wave. Upstream there can be no magnetohydrodynamic interaction because of the zero conductivity, but the conducting downstream region may have a magneticStructure which interacts with the flow variables. A theoretical analysis is made in the zeromagnetic-Prandtl-number (‘non-viscous ’) limit, i.e. ohmic dissipation is the dominant diffusion mechanism. Unlike magnetohydrodynamic shocks in a pre-ionized gas, ionizing shock waves are not necessarily plane-polarized. Thus ‘skew ’ shock structures can exist, in which the upstream and downstream magnetic field vectors and the shock wave normal do not all lie in a single plane. Explicit solutions are given for typical values of the governing parameters, showing how the magnetic field vector rotates about the shock wave normal as its transverse component changes in magnitude through the shock layer. Skew shocks are necessarily sub-Alfvénic downstream. Unlike the pre-ionized case, the range of trans-Alfvénic shock waves is not excluded, since these shocks can absorb Alfvén waves within their structure. With strong magnetic fields it is possible to achieve very high downstream temperatures by Joule heating. Alternatively, in some cases, magnetic energy can be fed into directed kinetic energy, producing an overall expansion shock.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cowley, M. D. 1967 J. Plasma Phys. 1, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunker, W. B. & Gross, R. A. 1962 Plasma Hydromagnetics (ed. Bershader, D.), p. 58. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, B. P. 1966 Phys. Fluids, 9, 917.Google Scholar
Leonard, B. P. 1969 Phys. Fluids, 12, 1816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, B. P. 1970 a Phys. Fluids, 13, 833.Google Scholar
Leonard, B. P. 1970 b Phys. Fluids, 13, 3063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, B. P. 1972 a J. Plasma Phys. 7, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, B. P. 1972 b J. Plasma Phys. 7, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, B. P. 1972 c Rev. Mod. Phys. (To be published.)Google Scholar
Molander, R. C. & Berger, S. A. 1969 Phys. Fluids, 12, 2531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherclief, J. A. 1965 A Textbook of Magnetohydrodynamics. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Taussig, R. T. 1965 Phys. Fluids, 8, 1616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taussig, R. T. 1967 Phys. Fluids, 10, 1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van, Dyke M. 1964 Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics. Academic.Google Scholar