Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:00:55.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ion density and current distributions in a propagating current sheet, determined by microwave reflection technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

W. R. Ellis  and
R. G. Jahn
W. R. Ellis
Affiliation:
Department of the Aerospace and Mechanical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J..
R. G. Jahn
Affiliation:
Department of the Aerospace and Mechanical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J..
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Electron and ion density distributions and the problem of electron/ion current partitioning are studied in a large radius Z-pinch in argon. Radial scans of the electron density and temperature proffles in the propagating sheet are obtained with a multi-purpose microwave interferometer which measures the complex refiexion coefficient from the plasma. At 70 GHz the probe resolves densities up to 1017 cm−3 over dimensions of ˜ 4 mm. Proffles of the electric and magnetic field components are obtained using standard probe techniques, and these data are used to calculate ion and electron current components in the sheet.

Within the approximations of MHD theory, calculations show that the overall axial current pattern is built up of four interior zones alternately dominated by electron or ion current. This structure is observed to be closely correlated with variations of the Hall parameter, Wb/vc, about the value of unity through the sheet, which suggests that this parameter might be used as a guide to the relative importance of ion conduction in pinch discharge current sheets.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , May 1969 , pp. 189 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albini, F. A. & Jahn, R. G. 1961 J. Appl. Phys. 32, 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, N. A. 1965 Linear pinch driven by a high current pulse-forming network. AIAA Bull. 2, 6, 309.Google Scholar
Black, N. A. 1966 Dynamics of a Pinch Discharge Driven by a High Current Pulse-forming Network. Princeton Univ. Aeron. Rept 778, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Bodin, H. A. B., Newton, A. A. & Peacock, N. J. 1961 Nuclear Fusion 1, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, H. A. B. & Newton, A. A. 1963 Phys. Fluids 6, 1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, L. C. & Lovberg, R. H. 1962 Phys. Fluids 5, 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, R. L. & Jahn, R. G. 1968 Phys. Fluids 11, 1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, W. R. 1967 An Investigation of Current Sheet Structure in a Cylindrical Z-pinch, Princeton Univ. Aeron. Rept 805, Princeton, N.J. Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Funahashi, A. & Takeda, S. 1968 J. Appl. Phys. 39, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heald, M. A. & Wharton, C. B. Plasma Diagnostics with Microwaves. New York: Wiley and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermansdorfer, H. 1965 Measurement of High Electron Densities in a Linear Z-pinch using a New Microwave Reflection Probe. Report IPP 1/37, Institut fur Plasmaphysik, Garching.Google Scholar
Huddlestone, R. H. & Leonard, S. L., eds. 1965 Plasma Diagnostic Techniques. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jahan, R. G. et al. 1965 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 36, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahn, R. G. 1962 Phys. Fluids 5, 678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahn, R. G. 1960 Interaction of Electromagnetic Waves with Slightly Ionized Gases. Guggenheim Jet Propulsion Center, California Institute of Technology, Report TN-2.Google Scholar
Jahn, R. G. et al. 1968 Pulsed Electromagnetic Gas Acceleration. 12th Semi-annual progress report for the period 1 January 1968 to 30 June 1968, Princeton University Aerospace and Mechanical Science Report no. 634h, July 1968. Ibid. Reports no. 634h, 634j.Google Scholar
Johansson, R. B. 1965 Phys. Fluids 8, 866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovberg, R. 1963 Proceedings of VI International Conference on Ionization Phenomena in Gases (Paris, 1963), vol. iv, pp. 235.Google Scholar
Lovberg, R. 1966 AIAA J. 34, no. 7, 1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovberg, R. 1964 Phys. Fluids 7, S 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, J. C. 1959 Microwave Transmission. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Spitzer, L. 1962 Physics of Full-Ionized Gases, 2nd ed. New York: Interscience.Google Scholar
Sutton, G. W. & Sherman, A. 1965 Engineering Magnetohydrodynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Takeda, S. & Tsukishima, T. 1965 Microwave Reflection Techniques for Dense Plasma Diagnostics. U.S. National Bureau of Standards Report NBS-256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, G. N. 1952 A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
York, T. M. 1968 Pressure Distributions in the Current Sheet Structure of a Dynamic Pinch Discharge, Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton Univ.Google Scholar