Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:28:33.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High-β effect on the generalized ion Berstein mode near the lower hybrid frequency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

Mitsuhiro Nambu†
Mitsuhiro Nambu†
Affiliation:
Geophysical Institute, University of Tokoyo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The dispersion curves of mixing mode between electrostatic and electromagnetic waves propagating perpendicularly to the ambient magnetic field are computed for frequency range near the lower hybrid frequency in the case of a finite-β plasma with a Maxwellian velocity distribution. The detailed results apply to a hydrogen plasma. The result indicates that the lower hybrid frequency is neither the resonance frequency of the electromagnetic wave nor the cut-off frequency of the electrostatic wave. In a high-β plasma, the plateau of the dispersion curve disappears and the electrostatic approximation (Bernstein mode) is not valid up to the wavelength of the order of proton Larmor radius. The polarization is left-handed, and a trace of the most dominant intensity ratio of wave magnetic field energy to the electric field energy in each branch is given approximately by the cold-plasma dispersion curve.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , June 1972 , pp. 503 - 512
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bernstein, I. B. 1958 Phys. Rev. 109, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, F. W. 1965 Nucl. Fusion, 5, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eviator, A. & Schulz, M. 1970 Planet Space Sci. 18, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forslund, D. W. 1970 J. Geophys. Res. 75, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredricks, R. W. 1968 a J. Plasma Phys. 2, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredricks, R. W. 1968 b J. Plasma Phys. 2, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hortia, R. A. & Watanbae, T. 1969 Planet. Space Sci. 17, 61.Google Scholar
Oya, H. 1970 Goddard Space Flight Center Preprint X–621–70–352.Google Scholar
Oya, H. 1972 Radio Sciences. (To be published.)Google Scholar
Perlstein, L. D., Rosenbluth, M. N. & Chang, D. B. 1966 Phys. Fluids, 9, 953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, C. T., Holzer, R. E. & Smith, E. J. 1970 J. Geophys. Res. 75, 755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stix, T. H. 1962 The Theory of Plasma Waves. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Tataronis, J. A. & Crawford, F. W. 1970 J. Plasma Phys. 4, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tidman, D. A. 1960 Phys. Rev. 117, 366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar