Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:43:04.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy equilibria in the diffuse pinch. Part 1. Classical scalar conductivity and neo-classical models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

A. Tommiura  and
M. G. Haines
A. Tommiura
Affiliation:
Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, London
M. G. Haines
Affiliation:
Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Numerical solutions of the momentum and energy equilibria in a two-temperature diffuse pinch show that it is possible for the electron temperature to have a radially oscillating component with a wavelength of the order of ae(mi/me)1/2, where ae is the electron Larmor radius. This is also the order of magnitude of the optimum wavelength for growth of an electro-thermal instability in a homogeneous plasma (studied in part 3 of this series) and suggests this kind of instability as a possible primary source of a current filamentation in the plasma. It has also been revealed both analytically and computationally in this strictly steady state model that the pressure of one species (ions or electrons) is finite at the wall boundary; the same study carried out on a neo-classical model shows, however, that strict confinement is possible provided some restrictions are imposed upon its free parameters. This is also found with a model employing classical tensor conductivity (studied in part 2).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , December 1979 , pp. 397 - 420
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Artsimovich, L. A., Bobrovsky, O. A., Gorbunov, E. P., Ivanov, D. P., Kirillov, V. D., Kuznetzov, B. I., Mirnov, S. V., Petrov, M. P., Razumova, K. A., Strelkov, V. S. & Shcheglov, D. A. 1969 Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research, vol 1. IAEA.Google Scholar
Arunasalam, V., Cano, R., Hosea, J. C. & Mazzucato, B. 1977 Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 888.Google Scholar
Bernstein, I. B. & Robinson, D. B. 1962 Ann. Phys. 18, 110.Google Scholar
Braginskii, S. I. 1965 Reviews of Plasma Physics, vol. 1 (ed. Leontovich, M. A.), p. 205. Consultants Bureau.Google Scholar
Chapman, S. & Cowling, T. G. 1970 The Mathematical Theory of Non-Uniform Gases, 3rd edn.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Düchs, D. F., Furth, H. P. & Riutherford, P. H. 1971 IAEA-CN.28/c.4.Google Scholar
Furth, H. P., Rosenbluth, M. N., Rutherford, P. H. & Stodiek, W. 1970 Phys. Fluids, 13, 12, 3020.Google Scholar
Haines, M. G., 1974 Plasma Physics (ed. Keen, B. E.), p. 177. Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
Hinton, F. L., Wiley, J. C., Düchs, D. F., Furth, H. P., & Rutherford, P. H. 1972 Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 11, 698.Google Scholar
MacMahon, A. B. & Ware, A. A. 1973 Nucl. Fusion, 13, 413.Google Scholar
Rose, D. J. & Clark, M. 1961 Plasmas and Controlled Fusion, 1st edn.M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, M. N., Hazeltine, R. D. & Hinton, F. L. 1972 Phys. Fluids, 15, 116Google Scholar
Spitzer, L. 1962 Physics of Fully Ionized Gases, 2nd edn.Interscience.Google Scholar
Stacey, W. M. 1974 Nucl. Fusion, 14, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomimura, A. 1977 Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar